СONSIDERATION OF CLAIMES CANCELLATION OF DECISIONS BY NATIONAL COURTS THAT HAVE ENTERED INTO FORCE BY THE SUPREME COURT OF FINLAND

Vitolds Zahars, Vladimir Jilkine

Abstract


Rakstā tiek pētīts spēkā stājušos tiesas nolēmumu pārskatīšanas pamatojums un procedūra sakarā ar Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesas konstatētajiem Eiropas Cilvēktiesību un pamatbrīvību aizsardzības konvencijas pārkāpumiem lietas izskatīšanā Somijas Augstākajā tiesā, sakarā ar ko iesniedzējs vērsies Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesā. Autori pauž viedokli, ka Konvencijas 6. panta nepietiekoša korelācija ar Somijas likumdošanas aktiem izvirza nepieciešamību nacionālajā tiesību sistēmā uzlabot cietušās puses restitutio in integrum garantijas.

Full Text:

PDF

References


HE 184/1997 [the Government Bill for the enactment of the Openness of Government Activities Act (HE 184/1997)].

Recommendation No. R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgements of the European Court of Human Right. (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 19 January 2000 at the 694th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies) i. 3.

Judgment of Supreme Court, case of Selistö on 14.03.2008.

Judgment of Supreme Court, case of Eino Laaksonen on 27.10.2009.

Judgment of Supreme Court KKO: 2002:51, 13.6.2002.

Judgment of Supreme Court R2010/116, 24.5.2012.

Recommendation No R (2000) 2. Art. 12.

“…in the circumstances of the present case, the Supreme Court could not adequately resolve the applicant's case without holding an oral hearing”, para 48. ECHR, Case of Suuripää v. Finland.

Judgment of Supreme Court H2010/116, 24.5.2012.

Judgment of Finnish Supreme Court, KKO: 2011:100, 22.11.2011.

Case of Sorvisto v. Finland, no 19348/04, 13 January 2009.

Case of Pirtimäki v. Finland. Application no 35232/11, 20 May 2014.

Judgment of Supreme Court of Finland KKO: 2014:95. Case of Glantz, 12.12.2014.

Case of Zolotukhin v. Russia. No. 1493903. 10 February 2009.

Case of Hornsby v. Greece. Application no.18357/91, 19 March 1997.

Case of Kangasluoma v. Finland , Application no.48339/99, 20 January 2004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i73.4361

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Administrative and Criminal Justice



This journal is distributed with an international license:

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License