STUDENT PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT TODAY: THEORETICAL REVIEW

Authors

  • Ilga Kolosova Rezekne Academy of technologies (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/er2021.2.6719

Keywords:

competences, education, society, support, values in education

Abstract

In the main functions of education in the last century, which indicate the development of children's individuality or the importance of thinking in the educational process, creative thinking and action, it is important that these functions can be developed in a 21st century socialized student. It is important to look for solutions to new methods of adaptation in the educational process and preserving their values. It is also important to recognize that the development of a teaching method is increasingly dependent on students' willingness to learn and develop as a person. Pupil's inclusion in a new school is always associated with a psychological experience, when the pupil's emotional competence must be related to the school's microclimate. The integration of modern students in the educational institution, readiness to participate in social and civic activities, interact with teachers and their adolescents is determined by several external factors, as well as student characteristics, their individuality, physiological, mental and psychological development, emotional ability to socialize. The research includes research of scientific literature, based on existing education systems, performing analytical judgment.Purpose of the research: To identify the development of students' skills during the learning process, for their more successful integration into modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anspoka, Z. (2014). Tradicionālais un inovatīvais mūsdienu pedagoģiskajā procesā: dažas problēmas un risinājumi. Sabiedrība. Integrācija. Izglītība. Starptautiskās zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums.

Arāja, I. (2015). Metodes un paņēmieni izglītības darbā. Retrieved from https://www.izm.gov.lv/images/Erasmus/konference/I_Araja_Metodes.pdf

Eiduka, D. (2019). Latvijas Bērnu labklājības tīkls. Jauniešu labbūtība Baltijas valstīs: pētījuma kopsavilkums. Retrieved from

https://www.izm.gov.lv/lv/media/2194/download

Fernandez Gonzalez, M. J. (2019a). Rakstura un tikumiskās audzināšanas kultūrvēsturiskā izpēte Latvijā un pasaulē, 16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/rtal

Fernandez Gonzalez, M. J. (2019b). Skolēnu morālā audzināšana Latvijas skolās: vecāku, skolotāju, topošo skolotāju un skolu un izglītības pārvaldes vadītāju viedokļi. Populārzinātniskais pētījuma ziņojums, 13-15.

Pieejams: http://blogi.lu.lv/manuels/files/2019/04/Ziņojums_Skolēnu-morālā-audzināšana-Latvijas-skolās.pdf

Hoskins, B., & Fredriksson, U. (2008). Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=xl6JJAsAAAAJ&citation_for_view=xl6JJAsAAAAJ:2osOgNQ5qMEC

IZM. Izglītības attīstības pamatnostādnes 2021.-2027.gadam (2020). Nākotnes prasmes nākotnes sabiedrībai. Retrieved from

https://www.izm.gov.lv/sites/izm/files/iap2027_projekta_versija_apspriesana_160720201_2.pdf

Jonson, B. (2013). How Do We Know When Students Are Engaged? Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/student-engagement-definition-ben-johnson

Kaniņa, I. (2020). Promotion of youth involvement for early school leaving prevention. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume IV, May 22th-23th, 243-253. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol4.4958

Kalniņa, D. (2019). Novitātes pedagoģijā profesionālās izglītības skolotājiem. Mūsdienu skolotājs, mūsdienu skolā. Retrieved from

https://profizgl.lu.lv/mod/book/view.php?id=12113&chapterid=2689

Kepule, I., & Strode, A. (2020). A Process-Oriented Model For The Formation Of Self-Expression Skills In Teaching Music To Pupils Of The Primary Education Stage. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume V, 684-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol5.5174

Kyeongheui, K. ( 2013). Teaching Approaches and Student Involvement in Learning to Write: Gap between Korean Students’ Expectations and Teaching Approaches. SAGE Open 3. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2158244013490702

Latvijas Vides aizsardzības un reģionālās attīstības ministrija. Ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030.gadam (2010). Retrieved from https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/latvijas-ilgtspejigas-attistibas-strategiju-lidz-2030gadam-latvija2030

Laar, A., & Deursen, A. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176

Oliņa, Z., Namsone, D., & France, D. (2018). Kolektīva monologs. Kompetence, kā komplekss skolēna mācīšanās rezultāts. Mācīšanās Lietpratībai. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/ml.2018.1

Žogla, I. (2017). Pedagogical and Educational Sciences: competing traditions in the study of education in Latvia in: G. Whitty & J. Furlong (Eds.), Knowledge and the Study or Education: an international exploration. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education, vol. 27, No. 1.

Downloads

Published

21.01.2022

How to Cite

Kolosova, I. (2022). STUDENT PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT TODAY: THEORETICAL REVIEW. Education Reform: Education Content Research and Implementation Problems, 2, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.17770/er2021.2.6719