Using the Concept of Fuzzy Random Events in the Assessment and Analysis of Ecological Risks

Oleg Uzhga-Rebrov, Galina Kuleshova


In many cases, the assessment and analysis of ecological risks is a complicated task, which is first of all related to obtaining reliable initial information. As a rule, ecological risks are due to unrepeated unique situations; from this it follows that sufficient statistical data on whose basis reliable evaluation of specific risks is made, are not available. On the other hand, unfavourable impacts on the external environment can affect the components of an ecosystem differently. The complexity of correlations among the components of an ecosystem significantly complicates an analysis of possible impacts on the components of a specific system.

When statistical data are missing or insufficient, experts who perform the required assessment on the basis of their knowledge and experience but often also using their intuition, are the only source of initial data. Here, however, the problem of reliability of expert evaluations arises. If other sources of information are missing, we have to accept subjective evaluations of experts as a basis, without an opportunity to evaluate the degree of their confidence.

In this kind of situation, it seems to be validated to introduce the extent of uncertainty into the evaluations of parameters of ecological risks. This can be accomplished by using fuzzy initial evaluations. This paper focuses on the concept of fuzzy random events and shows favourable chances of using that concept in the assessment and analysis of ecological risks. 


Function of membership to a fuzzy random event; fuzzy random event; operations on fuzzy events; probability distribution function; probability of a fuzzy random event

Full Text:



J. van den Berg and U. Kaumak. „On the Notion of Statistical Fuzzy Entropy”, in Soft Methodology and Random Information Systems, Advances in Soft Computing, Heidelberg: Physica Verlag, 2004, pp.535 – 542.

S. Gudder, “What Is Fuzzy Probability Theory?” Foundations of Physics, Vol. 30, No. 10, 2000, pp. 1663 – 1678.

G.J. Klir and B.Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1995.

M.G. Morgan and M. Henrion, Uncertainty. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1998.

K. Tanaka, An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic for Practical Applications. New York etc.: Springer, 1997, 138 p.

O. Užga-Rebrovs, Lēmumu analīze. Rēzekne: AR izdevniecība, 1997.

O. Užga-Rebrovs Komerciālo lēmumu analīze. I, II daļa. Rēzekne: RA izdevniecība, 2001.

О.I. Uzhga-Rebrov, Upravlenije neopredelennostjami. Chastj 4. Kombinirovanije neopredelennostej, Rēzekne: RA Izdevniecība, 2014. (In Russian).

A. Walaszek-Babiszevska, “Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events and Linguistic Fuzzy Modeling – Forms Expressing Randomness and Imprecision”, in Proceedings of 7th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Artifical Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Data Bases (AIKED’08), University of Cambridge, UK, Feb. 20 – 22, 2008, pp. 207 – 213.

L.A. Zadeh, „Probability Measures of Fuzzy Events”, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,Vol. 23, No 2, 1968, pp. 421 – 427.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank