Georgi Hrenov, Karin Reinhold, Piia Tint


The key persons in safety activities at enterprises are: top manager, his(her) representatives, working environment specialist, all acting for the employer; and working environment representatives, selected by the workers and holding the workers’ rights in safety and health area. The main possibilities to improve the safety level in the firm have the working environment specialists, as they are usually educated and supported by the employer and the law. The current paper is looking for the possibilities to raise the employers’ interest for improvement of their knowledge in safety and through this also the safety level in the workplace. Safety level in 12 Estonian enterprises was investigated using MISHA method (based on standard OHSAS 18001). Some of the firms have implemented OHSAS 18001 or belong to the foreign companies. The investigated enterprises were from different industries and agriculture firms. The safety level is very much depended on the owner of the firm. The larger the enterprise is the better are the possibilities to educate the employers and employees. One of the ideas to improve the safety level at enterprise is the method “learning through the interviews”. The interview is worked out basing on MISHA method. The latter is a tool of quantitative study. The safety performance key elements were divided into three parts: formal, real, combined ones. Three hypothesis were formulated and the area in which they are proved concerning employer’s activities were as follows: H1) Standard OHSAS 18001 has an impact on Formal safety performance in companies (p value< 0.013) – if OHSAS 18001 has been implemented, then: the assignment of tasks and responsibilities in OHS is committed to the top management, the employer is revising the safety policy, and the personnel’s responsibilities in OHS are clearly defined. H2) Standard OHSAS 18001 has an impact on Real safety performance. (p< 0.013) - if OHSAS 18001 is implemented, then: the top manager promotes dissemination of safety policy: the policy is made available to all of the personnel; resources for improvement are arranged by the top management; the top manager arranges meetings in OHS; there is a system for redesigning the workplaces for the persons who have difficulties in coping with the work. H3) Standard OHSAS 18001 has an impact on Combined safety performance (p< 0.007) - if OHSAS 18001 implemented, then: the top management is participating in the preparation of safety policy, top manager is reviewing the safety policy, is it operating effectively? He is informing the external bodies about the company’s safety policy’s effectiveness; the top manager arranges safety training for all of the personnel; there is a plan for reduction of accidents; it has been elaborated by the top manager; the company has a system for measuring the social climate in the company.


employer’s responsibilities in safety and health; occupational health and safety (OHS); safety and health management; safety in small and medium-sized enterprises; work environment

Full Text:



Õ. Paas, “Development of the safety management system at enterprises,” PhD Thesis, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonian, pp. 164, 2015.

G. Hrenov, Õ. Paas, P. Tint, and K. Reinhold, “Workers’ representatives in OHS activities: example of Estonian industrial sector,” Agronomy Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 377-391, 2016.

OHSAS 18001:2007. Occupational health and safety management standard. British Standardization Board.

L. S. Robson, and P. L. Bigelow, “Measurement properties of occupational health and safety management audits: a systematic literature search and traditional literature synthesis,” Can/Public Health, vol.101 (Suppl. 1), pp. 534-540, 2010.

Y. Kim, J. Park, M. Park, “Creating a culture of prevention in occupational safety and health practice,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 7, pp .89-96, 2016.

Õ. Paas, K. Reinhold, and P. Tint, “Estimation of safety performance by MISHA method and the benefits of OHSAS 18001 implementation in Estonian manufacturing industry,” Agronomy Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp.792-809, 2015.

Õ. Paas, Reinhold, K., and P: Tint, “OHSAS 18001 contribution to real and formal safety elements of safety management in manufacturing companies: results of statistical analysis,” Agronomy Research, vol.13, no.5, 2015, pp.1260-1274.

R. Muthuviknesh, and K. A. Kumar, “The effect of occupational health and safety management on work environment: a prospective study,” International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 63-70, 2014.

S. M: Zin, and F. Ismail, “Employers’ behavioural safety compliance factors toward occupational, safety and health improvement in the construction industry,” Procedia, Social and Behavioural Sciences, vol. 36, pp.742-751, 2012.

S. Gautam, J. Maiti, A. Suamsundar, and S. Sarkar, “Segmented point process models for work system safety analysis,” Safety Science, vol. 95, pp. 15-27, 2017.

I.N. Isik, and E. Atasoylu, “Occupational safety and health in North Cyprus: evaluation of risk assessment,” Safety Science, vol. 94, pp. 17-25, 2017.

E. Tompa, C. Kalcevich, M. Foley, C. Mcleod, S. Hogg-Johnson, K. Cullen, E. MacEachen, G. Mahood, and E. Irvin, “A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of occupational health and safety regulatory enforcement,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 919-933, 2016.

S. M. Kyaw-Myint, L. Strazdins, M. Clements, P. Butterworth, and L. Gallagher, “A method of identifying health-based benchmarks for psychosocial risks,” Safety Science, vol. 93, pp. 143-151, 2017.

M. A. Gopang, M. Nebhwani, A. Khatri, and H. B. Marri, “An assessment of occupational health and safety measures and performance of SMEs: an empirical study,” Safety Science, vol. 93, pp. 127-133, 2017.

J. E. Karlsen, P.H. Lindoe, “The Nordic OHS model at a turning point?” Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, vol. 4, no.1, pp.17-30, 2016.

A. Kuusisto. “Safety management systems: audit tools and reliability of auditing,” PhD thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 2000.

A. A. Kadir, S. Sarip, N.H. N. Mahmood, S. M. Yusof, M. Z. Hassan, M. Y. Md. Daud and S. S. Aziz, “A review of integrated management system in the offshore oil and gas industry,” Journal of Advanced Review on Scientific Research, vol. 12, no.1, pp. 11-25, 2015.

A. Field, “Discovering statistics using IBM statistics. Fourth edition. SAGE Publications Ltd., [Online]. Available: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/field4e/main.htm. [Accessed Aug.2016].

OHS Act (Occupational Health and Safety Act of Estonia). Passed 16.06.1999. State Gazette of Estonia, RTI 1999, 60, 616.

M. O’Toole, “The relationship between employees’ perceptions of safety and organizational culture. Journal of Safety Research, vol. 33, pp. 231-243, 2002.

D. M. DeJoy, L: J. Della, R.J. Vanderberg, and M.G. Wilson, “Making work safer: testing a model of social exchange and safety management,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 41, pp.163-171, 2010.

A. Neal, M.A. Griffin, and P. M. Hart., “The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behaviour,” Safety Science, vol. 34, pp. 99-109, 2000.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/etr2017vol1.2520


  • There are currently no refbacks.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank