Ilze Kazaine


An increasing number of educational institutions in the study process uses one of the e-learning systems. Consequently, more and more students are offered learning materials in electronic format. E-materials in distance learning and e-learning is one of the most important elements, therefore much attention and enough time should be paid for their development. There are a number of studies on e-learning quality, where criteria of quality are discussed in the context of chosen e-learning environment and the process of implementation. This article examines only the quality of e-material. The aim was to find a way to reduce the effort and time of electronic learning material quality evaluation. The study used content analysis by summarizing the most important factors influencing the quality for teaching materials. Based on the quality criteria mentioned in the literature and personal experience, a criterion, which affects quality of e-learning material, were summarized and grouped. The criteria were grouped into four groups resulting from didactic, media, usability and formal quality. Quality evaluation is performed by using one of the methods used in software engineering - checklist. Based on the identified quality criteria a checklist was established. In order to facilitate the evaluation process a web-based tool is offered. The tool includes a defined checklist with assessment rating scale and three levels of impact. Evaluation of material quality is shown in the terms of percentage. After testing the tool, it could be used for course developers, program managers or other persons involved in evaluation process of e-learning resources.


checklist; evaluation; quality indicators; self-assessment tool

Full Text:



Latvijas Nacionālā standartizācijas institūcija „Latvijas standarts”, “Informācija un dokumentācija – Vārdnīca,” (Information and documentation – Vocabulary), standarts LVS ISO 5127:2005, 2005. (In Latvian)

J. Dzelme, A. Kapenieks, M. Upmale, L. Jermolajeva, V. Vikmane, A. Rengarte, I. Buligina, B. Žuga, Dz. Tomsons, S. Gibže un A. Škute, Tālākizglītības kvalitātes vērtēšanas rokasgrāmata. (Quality Assessment Guide of Distance learning) Rīga: Lielvārds, 2001, 32.lpp. (In Latvian)

U.-D. Ehlers, “Quality in e-learning from a learner’s perspective,” European Journal for Distance and Open Learning, [Online]. Available: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2004/Online_Master_COPs.html . [Accessed January 16, 2017].

E. Bratengeyer, A. Bubenzer, J. Jäger und G. Schwed, eLearning Qualitäts-Evaluationstool. (E-learning quality evaluation tool ) Books on Demand, 2015. (In German)

E. Bratengeyer and G. Schwed, “eLQe: A Cool Tool for Simply Evaluating Your E-learning Course Development,” In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace, 2016, New York, USA. [Online]. Available: https://www.icelw.org/proceedings/2016/ICELW2016/Papers/Bratengeyer_Schwed.pdf [Accessed February 6, 2017].

Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2010, 2112 p.

A. Geske un A Grīnfelds, Testu teorijas elementi izglītībā. (Test theory in education) LU projekta „Profesionālajā izglītībā iesaistīto vispārizglītojošo mācību priekšmetu pedagogu kompetences paaugstināšana” materiāls, vienošanās Nr.2009/0274/1DP/, LU reģistrācijas Nr.ESS2009/88, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://profizgl.lu.lv/pluginfile.php/22519/mod_resource/content/0/AGrinfelds_AGeske/Testi_izglitibaa_final2.pdf [Accessed January 16, 2017]. (In Latvian)

L. A. Wingate, “The Evaluation Checklist Project: The Inside Scoop on Content, Process, Policies, Impact, and Challenges,” Nov 4, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/insidescoop.pdf. [Accessed February 6, 2017].

H. M. Niegemann, S. Domagk, S. Hessel, A. Hein, M. Hupfer und A. Zobel, Kompendium multimediales Lernen. (Compendium of multimedial learning) Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 81 p. (In German)

G. D. Rey, E-Learning: Theorien, Gestaltungsempfehlungen und Forschung. (E-learning: theories, design recommendations and research) Hogrefe AG: Bern, 2009. (In German)

Swedish National Agency for Higher Education “E-learning quality. Aspects and criteria for evaluation of e-learning in higher education,” Report 2008:11R, 2008.

A. Usoro and G. Majewski, “Measuring Quality e-Learning in Higher Education,” International Journal of Global Management Studies, vol.1, pp. 1-32, 2009.

E. Bratengeyer, “Entwicklung eines Web-basierten Tools zur eLearning-Qualitätsevaluation” (Development of a web-based tool for eLearning quality evaluation) Hamburger eLearning-Magazin, no. 17, S. 28-31, Juli 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.uni-hamburg.de/elearning/hamburger-elearning-magazin-14.pdf. [Accessed February 6, 2017]. (In German)

D. Dinevski, J. Jakončič, M. Lokar and B. Žnidaršič, A model for quality assessment of electronic learning material: Proceedings of the ITI 2010, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, pp. 343-348, 2010.

C.-Ch. Fey, Kostenfreie Online-Lehrmittel: eine kritische Qualitätsanalyse. (Free online teaching material: a critical quality analysis) Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt, 2015, 320 S. (In German)

C. Pappas, “The Ultimate eLearning Course Design Checklist,” April 10, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://elearningindustry.com/the-ultimate-elearning-course-design-checklist. [Accessed February 6, 2017].

Z. Krajcso, “Classification and quality criteria for Open Educational Resources in the field of foreign language learning,” Journal of Language and Cultural Education, vol. 4, Iss. 1, p. 48–59, 2016.

D. Madden, “17 elements of good online courses,” Aug 3, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://www.honolulu.hawaii.edu/facdev/guidebk/online/web-elem.htm. [Accessed January 16, 2017].

A. Sperl, „Bewertung der Qualität von Lehrmaterialien,“ (Assessment of the quality of e-learning materials) Dec.8, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://alexandersperl.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/bewertung-der-qualitat-von-lehrmaterialien/ [Accessed February 6, 2017]. (In German)

U. Grabe, L. Ionica, K. Kunze, P. Schneider und A. Schulz, „Entwicklung eines Bewertungsverfahrens zur Vergabe des @ward Preis für multimediales Lehren und Lernen an der Universität Halle,“ (Development of an evaluation procedure for awarding the @ward Prize for multimedia teaching and learning at the University of Halle) Hamburger eLearning-Magazin, no.17, S. 37-39, Juli 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.uni-hamburg.de/elearning/hamburger-elearning-magazin-14.pdf. [Accessed February 6, 2017]. (In German)

C. Schoor and H. Körndle, “Checklist for a Didactically Sound Design of eLearning Content,” no. 29, June 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.scribd.com/document/99490612/Cornelia-Schoor-Elearning-Papers-2012-checklist-for-a-Didactically-Sound-Design-of-Elearning-Content. [Accessed February 6, 2017].

R. C. Clark and C. Lyons, Graphics for Learning: Proven Guidelines for Planning, Designing, and Evaluating Visuals in Training Materials, 2nd Edition, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer, 2010, 420 p.

Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, “Developing Training Material Guide,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.msb.se/RibData/Filer/pdf/26433.pdf. [Accessed February 6, 2017].

E. J. Davidson, Evaluation Methodology Basics The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2005, 280 p.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2017vol2.2557


  • There are currently no refbacks.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank