Santa Rutkovska, Irēna Pučkina, Olga Frolova


During the realization of the scientific research program for mapping of the most invasive plant species of Latvia in the “Daugavas Loki” nature park (NP) field surveys were carried out during spring, summer and autumn seasons in 2016. In total 100 quadrats were surveyed. Invasive alien plants are species that are non-native to an ecosystem, and may cause a negative effect on environmental quality or human health. The obtained results indicate that the number of invasive alien plants species identified in 2016, i.e. 32 species, considerably increased in comparison with data about the distribution of invasive species given in the nature management plan of the “Daugavas Loki” NP in 2010, when only three species were mentioned. Many invasive plant species have been found in the ruderal biotopes – roadsides in the territory of nature park. The species with the highest number of localities are Acer negundo L., Sambucus racemosa L. and Rumex confertus Willd. The monitoring of certain most invasive species makes it possible to assess the changes in species number and occupied area.


invasive alien plant species; “Daugavas loki” nature park

Full Text:



P. Pyšek, D. M. Richardson, M. Rejmánek, G. L. Webster, M. Williamson, J. Kirschner, „Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better communication between taxonomists and ecologists”, Taxon, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 131-143, 2004b.

A. Priede, „Invazīvie neofīti Latvijas florā: izplatība un dinamika”. Promocijas darbs. Rīga, LU, 2009, 125 lpp.

P. E. Hulme, P. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, J. Pergl, U. Schaffner, M. Vilà, „Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts,” Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 212-218, 2013.

P. Pyšek, Z. Chocholoušková, A. Pyšek, V. Jarošík, M. Chytrý, L. Tichý, „Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades,” Journal of Vegetation Science, , vol. 15, pp. 781-788, 2004a.

P. Pyšek, On the terminology used in plant invasion studies. In: P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, M. Wade (eds.). Plant invasions - General aspects and special problems. Amsterdam: Academic Pulblishing, 1995, pp. 71-81.

F. Essl, D. Moser, T. Dirnböck, S. Dullinger, N. Milasowszk,y, M. Winter, W. Rabitsch, „Native, alien, endemic, threatened, and extinct species diversity in European countries,” Biological Conservation, vol. 164, pp. 90-97, 2013.

M. A. Schlaepfer, D. F. Sax, J. D. Olden, „The potential conservation value of nonnative species,” Conservation Biology, vol. 25, 428-437, 2011.

A. Monaco and P. Genovesi, European guidelines on protected areas and invasive alien species, 2014. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 13, 2017].

M. Chytry, L. C. Maskell, J. Pino, P. Pyšek, M. Vilà, X. Font, S. M. Smart, „Habitat invasions by alien plants: A quantitative comparison among Mediterranean:Subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 45, pp. 448–458, 2008.

P. Pyšek, M. Chytry, J. Pergl, J. Sádlo and J. Wild, „Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: Current state, introduction dynamics: Invasive species andinvaded habitats,” Preslia, vol. 84, pp. 575–629, 2012.

L. Souza, W. A. Bunn, D. Simberloff, R. M. Lawton, N. J. Sanders, „Biotic and abiotic influences on native and exotic richness relationship across spatial scales: favourable environments for native species are highly invasible,” Functional Ecology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1106-1112, 2011.

Ģ. Gavrilova and V. Šulcs, Latvijas vaskulāro augu flora. Taksonu saraksts. Rīga: Latvijas Akadēmiskā bibliotēka, 1999, 136 lpp.

NOBANIS (The European Network on Invasive Alien Species). Available: [Accessed: Feb. 2, 2017].

P. E. Hulme, P. Pyšek, J. Pergl, V. Jarošík, U. Schaffner and M. Vilà, „Greater focus needed on alien plant impacts in protected areas,” Conservation Lettters, vol. 7, pp. 459–466, 2014.

R. Otto, M. A. Arteaga, J. D. Delgado, J. R. Arévalo, C. H. Blandino and J. M. Fernández-Palacios, „Road edge effect and elevation patterns of native and alien plants on an oceanic island (Tenerife, Canary Islands),” Folia Geobotanica, vol. 49, pp. 65–82, 2014.

J. R. Arévalo, R. Otto, C. Escudero, S. Fernández-Lugo, M. Arteaga, J. D. Delgado, J. M. Fernández-Palacios, „Do anthropogenic corridors homogenize plant communities at a local scale? A case studied in Tenerife (Canary Islands),” Plant Ecology, vol. 209, pp. 23-35, 2010.

J. A. Allen, C. S. Brown and T. J. Stohlgren, “Non-native plant invasions of United States national parks,” Biological Invasions, vol. 11, pp. 2195–2207, 2009.

C. Pickering and A. Mount, “Do tourists disperse weed seed? A global review of unintentional human-mediated terrestrial seed dispersal on clothing, vehicles and horses,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 18, pp. 239–256, 2010.

L. C. Foxcroft, P. Pyšek, D. M. Richardson, P. Genovesi, Plant invasions in protected areas: patterns problems and challenges, 2013, 661 pp.

P. Pyšek, P. Genovesi, J. Pergl, A. Monaco, J. Wild, Plant invasions of protected areas in Europe: an old continent facing new problems. In L. C. Foxcroft et al. (eds.), Plant invasions in protected areas: patterns problems and challenges, 2013, pp. 209–240. .

Dabas parka “Daugavas loki” dabas aizsardzības plāns, 2010. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 15, 2017].

И. Фатаре, Флора долины реки Даугавы. Рига, Зинатне, 1989, 168 cтр.

K. Kupffer, Grundzüge der Pflanzengeographie des ostbaltischen Gebietes. Rīga: Abhandlungen des Herder-Instituts, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 1-224, 1925.

I. Fatare, Daugavas ielejas flora. Rīga: Zinātne, 1987, 80 lpp.

M. Laiviņš, Robežsugu horoloģiskā analīze un veģetācijas migrācija. Latvijā. Grām.: Latvijas veģetācija, 18. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas institūts, 2009, 89.-105. lpp

S. Rutkovska, I. Pučka, I. Novicka, P. Evarts-Bunders, „Relationship of geographic distribution of the most characteristical invasive plant species in habitats adjacent to the river Daugava within the territory of Daugavpils city,” Acta Biologica Universitatis Daugavpiliensis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 163-175, 2011.

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, „Resident population by sex in cities under state jurisdiction, counties, towns and parishes at the beginning of the year”, 2016. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 20, 2017].

R. Meffin, R. P. Duncan, P. E. Hulme, „Landscape-level persistence and distribution of alien feral crops linked to seed transport,” Agriculture, cosystems and Environment, vol. 203, pp. 119-126, 2015.

Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 468 “List of Invasive Alien Plant Species” (Invazīvo augu sugu saraksts) ("LV", 100 (3884), 02.07.2008.) [stājas spēkā 03.07.2008.]

I. Kabucis, Latvijas Biotopi. Klasifikators. Rīga: Latvijas Dabas Fonds, 2001, 96 lpp.

N. Kabuce and N. Priede, NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Heracleum sosnowskyi. – From: Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS, 2010. [Accessed: Feb. 19,2017].

C. Nielsen, H. P. Ravn, W. Nentwig and M. Wade (eds.). The Giant Hogweed Best Practice Manual. Guidelines for the management and control of an invasive weed in Europe. - Forest and Landscape Denmark, Hoersholm, 2005, 44 pp.

A. Feher, Biological invasions of plants in Slovakia, Environment and Sustainable development, Rīga, University of Latvia, 2010, pp. 164-165.

O. Jakubowicz, C. Żaba, G. Nowak, S. Jarmuda, R. Żaba, J. T. Marcinkowski, „Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden,” Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 327–328, 2012.

P. Rzymski, P. Klimaszyk, B. Poniedziałek, „Invasive giant hogweeds in Poland: Risk of burns among forestry workers and plant distribution,” BURNS, vol. 41, pp. 1816-1822, 2015.

A. Bērziņš, A. Oļukalns, D. Lapiņš, A. Lejiņš, A. Sprincina, Ģ. Gavrilova, V. Liguts, “Latvānis (Heracleum) un tā izplatība Latvijā”, Agronomijas Vēstis, vol. 5, pp. 86-93, 2003.

M. Laiviņš and Ģ. Gavrilova, “Heracleum sosnowskyi in Latvia: sociology, ecology and distribution”, Latvijas veģetācija, 7, Rīga, LU, 2004, 45. - 65. lpp.

P. Mędrzycki, NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Acer negundo. – From: Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species – NOBANIS, 2011. [Accessed: Feb. 21, 2017].

P. Sikorski and D. Sikorska, „The role of habitat factors in successful invasion of alien plant Acer negundo in riparian zones”, EGU Gerneral Assembly, vol. 18, 2016. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 16, 2017].

L. Udvardy, Boxelder (Acer negundo). In The most important invasive plants in Hungary (Eds. Botta-Dukát, Z. & Balogh, L.). Institute of Ecology and Botany, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Vácrátót, Hungary, 2008, pp. 115–120.

V. Batanjski, B. Bokić, V. H. Širka, M. Radanović, EPPO Prioritisation Process for Acer negundo L. for North Part of Serbia (Vojvodina), EPPO Training, Belgrade 8.-11. July, 2013. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 27, 2017].

P. Künstler, “The role of Acer negundo L. in the structure of floodplain forests in the middle course of the Vistula river,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Ecology of the Invasive Alien Plants, October 13–16, 1999, La Maddalena, Sardinia, Italy.

J. L. Fryer, „Sambucus racemosa. In: Fire Effects Information System”, 2008 [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: [Accessed: Feb. 4, 2017].

K. Kupffer. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Gefasspflanzenflora Kurlands. Korr. Bl. d. Naturforscher-Vereins zu Riga, 42, 1899: pp. 100–140.

E. Lehmann, Flora von Polnisch – Livland der Florengebiete Nordwestrusslands, des Ostbalticums, der Gouvernements Pskow und St. Petersburg. Jurjew: Dorpat, 1895, 430 p.

Y. G. Tutin, V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters, D. A. Webb, Flora Europaea. Vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

USDA NRCS Corvallis Plant Materials Center, 2014. Available: [Accessed: Feb. 28, 2017].

J. Kollmann, S. A. Reiner, Light demands of shrub seedlings and their establishment within scrublands. – Flora. 1996, pp. 191-200.

T. Raycheva, „Rumex confertus (Polygonaceae) in the Bulgarian flora,” Botanica SERBICA, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 55-59, 2011.

Z. Gudžinskas, M. Kazlauskas, D. Pilāte, M. Balalaikins, M. Pilāts, A. Šaulys, I. Šauliene, L. Šukiene, Lietuvas un Latvijas pierobežas invazīvie organismi. BMK Leidykla, Vilnius, 2014, lpp. 91. – 139.

A. Priede, “Invazīvo svešzemju augu sugu izplatība Latvijā”. Grām.: Latvijas veģetācija, 17. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas insitūts, 2008, 148 lpp.

V. Jehlík, J. Sádlo, J. Dostálek, V. Jarolímová, L. Klimeš, „Chorology and ecology of Rumex confertus Willd. in the Czech Republic,”Botanica Lithuanica, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 235-244, 2001.

G. Meunier and C. Lavoie, “Roads as Corridors for Invasive Plant Species: New Evidence from Smooth Bedstraw (Galium mollugo),” Invasive Plant Science and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 92-100, January-March 2012.

P. A. Dar, Z. A. Reshi, M. A. Shahr, „Roads act as corridors for the spread of alien plant species in the mountainous regions: A case study of Kashmir Valley, India,” Tropical Ecology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 183-190, 2015.

R. Dobravolskaitė, „Development and Age of Amelanchier spicata shrubs,” Acta Biol.Univ. Daugavp., Suppl., vol. 2, pp. 145 – 152, 2010.

Z. Gudžinskas, Lietuvos flora. Lietuva, Vilnius, vol. 1, pp. 96–103, 2008.

P. L. S. Pavek, Plant guide for Canada goldenrod (Solidago canadensis). USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. Pullman, WA, 2011.



  • There are currently no refbacks.