Agita Livina, Mahender Reddy


The aim of this comparative article is to show the differences between the visitors' purposes and habits in two national parks: Gauja National Park (GNP) in Latvia and Kasu Bramhananda Reddy National Park (KBR) in Hyderabad, Telangana in India. As well as that, the article aims at highlighting differences in the functional use of the national parks and their locations in the urban and rural context. The study has used the secondary data analysis, such as the analysis and overview of the literature, previously conducted studies and information sources, visitors’ surveys in the national parks, and the exploration of the park areas for the evaluation of tourism infrastructure. The results of the study show distinct differences in the national park functions, target groups and their needs. The main target group in KBR is local inhabitants of the million city, and the national park basically fulfils the function of a city park –it is a green area for passive and active (jogging) leisure rather than a nature tourism offer. GNP has three target groups: the local population for a healthy leisure time, domestic visitors and foreign visitors for nature and cultural purposes. Thus, KBR status as a national park is misleading for the international traveller. In the future research it is planned to compare GNP with a national park in India which is located outside the urban environment, carrying out an in-depth study of visitors’ opinion on the purpose and elements of infrastructure.


nature based tourism; purpose; motivation; national parks; infrastructure

Full Text:



A. Stronza, W. Durham, “Ecotourism and conservation in the Americas”, Cambridge, MA: CAB International, 2008.

M. Honey, Ecotourism: Who owns paradise? (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press, 2008.

J.Higham, Critical issues in eco-tourism: Understanding a complex tourist phenomenon, Oxford: Elsevier. 2007.

C.M. Hall, Tourism Planning Policies, Processes and Relationships. 2nd edition. Pearson Education Limited: England, 2008.

D. Weaver, B. Faulkner, L. Lawton, L. “Nature-based tourism in Australia and beyond: Australia and beyond: a preliminary investigation”, Work-in-progress, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, 1999.

V. Pilāts. Biodiversity in Gauja National Park. Sigulda, Gauja National Park Administration, Tech.Rep. 2007.

World Health Statistics (WHS) 2016. World Health Organisation.

World Health Statistics (WHS) World Health Organisation. Tech.Rep. PP.155-165, 2013.

R. Mirzaei, “Modelling the Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Nature-Based Tourism to the Host Communities and their Support for Tourism. Perceptions of Local Population: Mazandaran, North of Iran,” Licentiate thesis, University of Giessen, 2013.

A. Livina, Dz. Atstaja, Dz., “Understanding the Philosophy and Performance of Tourism and Leisure in Protected Areas for transition to a Green Economy”, in Tourism in the Green Economy, (ed. Reddy, M.,V., Wilkes, K.), Routledge, 2015.

I. Druva-Druvaskalne, A. Līviņa, A. “Tourism in Latvia: from fragmented resorts of Russian empire to a national brand on international level”, in European Tourism Planning and Organisation Systems Volume II. (ed Costa, C., Panyik, E., Buhalis, D.) Channel View, 2015.

F. Giongo, J.Bosco, G.N. Wallace, A Study of Visitor Management in the World’s National Parks and Protected Areas. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado City, USA. 1993.

C. Srinivasulu, B. Srinivasulu, A.Rajesh, C. Rao, V. Nagulu. “Non-volant small mammals of Kasu Brahmananda Reddy National Park, Andhra Pradesh”, Zoos’ Print Journal, 19 (6), pp.1495-1497, 2004.

J. Deng, B. King, B., & T.Bauer, T. “Evaluating natural attractions for tourism”, Annals of tourism research, 29(2), pp. 422-438. 2002.

I. Druva-Druvaskalne, A. Līviņa, “Assessment of environmental aspects in rural tourism in two areas of the North Vidzeme Biosphere Reserve”, in: Economic, social and cultural aspects in biodiversity conservation (eds. Opermanis, O., Whitelaw, G.), Press

of University of Latvia. pp.19-30, 2008

L. Davidson, “On Nature`s Terms: preserving the Practice of traditional Backcountry Recreation in New Zealand`s National Parks”. In: Intangible natural Heritage New Perspectives on Natural Objects. Ed. Dorfman, E. Routledge, 2012.

S.Wall Reinius, P.Fredman, “Protected areas as attraction”, Annals of Tourism Research, Vol. 34, no 4, pp. 839-854, 2007.

P. Fredman and L. Tyrväinen, L. “Frontiers in Nature-Based Tourism”, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 10 (3), pp.177-189, 2010.

ENVIS. Centre on Wildlife & Protected Areas. National Wildlife Database. [Online]. April, 2017. Available:

N. Dudley, “IUCN Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories”, 2008. Available at

Moef. Minutes of the 7th expert committee, 2017. Available:

UNWTO. “Tourism statistics” [Online], 2017, Available:



  • There are currently no refbacks.