COMPETITIVENESS OF THE FISHERY SECTOR IN LATVIA

Inese Biukšāne

Abstract


The aim of the research is to evaluate the competitiveness of Fishery Sector in Latvia. Based on the author developed Model of the Factors influencing Competitiveness of the Fisheries Sector Cluster and methodology of the Index of Fishery Sector Competitiveness the authors determined the competitiveness level of Fishery Sector in Latvia and identified spheres influencing competitiveness: facilitating and promising spheres as well as procrastinatory and stagnating spheres, moreover the possibilities of further development were established. The author has developed the evaluation methodology of the Fishery Sector Competitiveness that can be used in any country in the Fishery Sector for the evaluation of competitiveness. The elaborated methodology for evaluation of competitiveness may assist the institutions involved in the Fisheries' policy formation to work more successfully and improve the common policy in the Fisheries sector.

Keywords


competitiveness; fishery; index; model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agriculture Ministry, “Ricibas programma zivsaimniecibas attīstībai 2014. – 2020. gadam (Operational Programme for Development of Fisheries 2014-2020),” CCI 2014LV14MFOP001, p. 138, 2014 (In Latvian).

Central Statistical Bureau database, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/?rxid=cdcb978c-22b0-416a-aacc-aa650d3e2ce0 [Accesed: January 03, 2017] (restricted access data).

European Commission, “Eiropas Jūrlietu un zivsaimniecības fonds Latvijā (European Maritime and Fisheries Fund in Latvia),” p. 4, 2014 (In Latvian).

European Parliament and Council, “European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No. 1380/2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC,” Official Journal of the EU, L 354, pp. 22-61, 28.12.2013.

European Parliament and Council, “European Parliament and Council Regulation (EU) No. 508/2014 on the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2328/2003, (EC) No 861/2006, (EC) No 1198/2006 and (EC) No 791/2007 and Regulation (EU) No 1255/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council,” Official Journal of the EU, L 149, pp. 1-66, 20.05.2014.

Finance Ministry, “Single Programming Document for Latvia. Objective 1 Programme 2004 – 2006,” p. 365, 2003.

I. Biukšāne, “Index of the Fisheries Sector Cluster Competitiveness: Internal factors,” SGEM2016 Conference Proceedings, Book II, vol. 4, pp. 347-354, doi: 10.5593/SGEMSOCIAL2016/B24/S07.046, 2016.

I. Biukšāne, “The results of the Interviews and the Questionnaire given by the representatives of the institutions involved in the Latvian fisheries sector policy-making and implementation and the fishery sector companies’ survey results (18.03.2016. - 13.04.2016.)” (restricted access data).

I. Biukšāne, I. Judrupa, “Evaluation of competitiveness of the fisheries sector cluster,” International Scientific Conference “Research for Rural Development 2016” Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 238-245, 2016.

Latvian Fisheries integrated control and information system “LFICIS” database, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://lzikis.zm.gov.lv/Account/LogOn [Accesed: January 03, 2017] (restricted access data).

Producer organizations, “Latvian producer organizations data”, 2017 (restricted access data).

R. Škapars, Ē. Šumilo, Latvijas ekonomikas un sabiedrības pārstrukturizācijas ietekme uz uzņēmējdarbības konkurētspēju un iedzīvotāju dzīves kvalitāti (Impact of Latvian Economy and Society Restructuring on the Competitiveness of Companies and life Quality of the Population). Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2006, p. 339 (In Latvian).

World Wide Fund for Nature, “Clean Baltic within Reach? How can a new chemical policy contribute to the protection of the Baltic Sea?,” p. 4, 2005.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2017vol1.2633

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SCImago Journal & Country Rank