COMPARISON OF ALGORITHMS FOR CONSTRUCTION DETECTION USING AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING AND NDSM CLASSIFICATION

Sergejs Kodors

Abstract


Traditional approach to classify the point cloud of airborne laser scanning is based on the processing of a normalized digital surface model (nDSM), when ground facilities are detected and classified. The main feature to detect a ground facility is height difference between adjacent points. The simplest method to extract a ground facility is region-growing algorithm, which applies threshold to identify the connection between two points. Region growing algorithm is working with the constant value of height difference. Therefore, it is not applicable due to diverse conditions of earth surface, when height difference must be defined for each region separately. As result, researchers propose hierarchical, statistical and cluster methods to solve this problem. The study goal is to compare four algorithms to generate nDSM: region growing, progressive morphological filter, adaptive TIN surfaces and graph-cut. The experiment is divided into two stages: 1) to calculate the number of detected and lost buildings in nDSM; 2) to measure the classification accuracy of extracted shapes. The experiment results have showed that progressive morphological filter and graph-cut provides the minimal loss of buildings (only 1%). The most effective algorithm for ground facility detection is the graph-cut (total accuracy 0.95, Cohen’s Kappa 0.89, F1 score 0.93).

Keywords


buildings; LiDAR; nDSM; remote sensing

Full Text:

PDF

References


S. Szénási, “Distributed Region Growing Algorithm for Medical Image Segmentation,” International Journal of Circuits, Systems And Signal Processing, vol. 8, pp. 173-181, 2014.

J. Kilian, N. Haala, and M. Englich, “Capture and evaluation of airborne laser scanner data,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 31, pp. 383–388, 1996.

K. Zhang, S.-C. Chen, “A Progressive Morphological Filter for Removing Nonground Measurements From Airborne LIDAR Data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 872-882, 2003.

P. Axelsson, “DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data using Adaptive TIN Models,” International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 33, pp. 110-117, 2000.

S. Kodors, “Land Cover Recognition using Min-Cut/Max-Flow Segmentation and Orthoimages,” Proceedings of the 10th International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol. 3,

pp. 127-133, 2015.

S. Kodors, A. Ratkevics, A. Rausis, J. Buls, “Building Recognition Using LiDAR and Energy Minimization Approach,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 43, pp. 109-117, 2015.

S. Kodors, “Geometric Feature Selection of Building Shape for Urban Classification,” Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference, vol. 2, pp. 78-83, 2017.

Z. Sun, X. Zhao, M. Wu, C. Wang, “Extracting Urban Impervious Surface from WorldView-2 and Airborne LiDAR Data Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks,” Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, vol. 47, pp. 1–12, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-018-0917-5

Z. Yang, W. Jiang, B. Xu, Q. Zhu, S. Jiang, W. Huang, “A Convolutional Neural Network-Based 3D Semantic Labeling Method for ALS Point Clouds,” Remote Sensing, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 936, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9090936

Y. Sun, X. Zhang, X. Zhao, Q. Xin. “Extracting Building Boundaries from High Resolution Optical Images and LiDAR Data by Integrating the Convolutional Neural Network and the Active Contour Model,” Remote Sensing, vol. 10, no 9, p. 1459, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091459




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol2.4032

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


SCImago Journal & Country Rank