SMART SPECIALISATION CONCEPT APPLICATION IN UNIVERSITIES: E-BUSINESS ONLINE STUDIES MODEL DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Aigars Andersons Vidzeme University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Social, Economic and Humanities Research. (LV)
  • Jozef Bushati Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Shkodra “Luigj Gurakuqi” (AL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol2.4115

Keywords:

E-business, online studies, Smart specialization, teaching methodology

Abstract

This paper discusses the Smart specialisation concept problems and challenges based on practice of Nordic and Baltic Higher Education Institutions. A particular focus of this research is devoted to the core understanding of the concept of Smart specialisation and its practical application for University level studies curriculum. EU Regional Cohesion Policy and other related EU policies play an important role to understand basic theoretical aspects for Smart specialisation. On the other hand, when specific case studies had been analysed in practice it is possible to see enormous variety of different misunderstandings of the matter. Even different study directions in the same University translate the Smart specialization terms mostly related to their individual study environments. As a result, it is possible to find in practice very different “Smart specialisation” concepts for technology, engineering, economics, IT and other study directions. As the research methodology/approach, the authors analyse the outcomes and challenges faced by different sets of case studies in Baltic and Nordic countries. Using EU, World Bank and other official national documents and publications, the authors explain the ways in which the Smart specialisation concept can be used in online learning environments. As an empirical research evidence there are analysed the outcomes from case studies - practical implementation of an online e-business study course jointly developed by 9 universities from Latvia, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Estonia, Lithuania, Sweden and Denmark supported by e-business field experts from Balkan area universities. Because of still existing gaps in Smart specialisation theoretical framework, the “grounded theory” approach have to be used more intensively when new and advanced theories have been created from practical outcomes of specific case studies. To solve a problem of Smart specialisation concept different translations and applications, authors of this paper propose to construct the teaching methodology of Smart specialisation concept into two consecutive levels - primary, as a core theory unique for all educators and secondary, as specific applied theories for each specific study direction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission, “Smart specialisation: Strengthening Innovation in Europe’s Regions, Smart specialisation Platform, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/guides/smart_spec/strength_innov_regions_en.pdf [Accessed February 11, 2019].

European Comission, “Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union,” Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 2014, p. 20, [Online]. Available: http://ww.w.xploit-eu.com/pdfs/Europe%202020%20Flagship%20Initiative%20INNOVATION.pdf [Accessed February 24, 2019].

D. Foray, P. A. David, and B. Hall, “Smart specialisation–the concept,” Knowledge economists policy brief, 9(85), June 2009, p. 100.

European Commission, “Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart specialisations (RIS 3), Regional Policy, Brussels, 2012.

S. Gemma and Z. Bulderberga, “Smart specialisation strategy assessment in Baltic States,” In Research for Rural Development: International Scientific Conference Proceedings (Latvia), Latvia University of Agriculture, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/rrd.23.2017.060

D. Foray, P. A. David, and B. Hall, “Smart specialisation from academic idea to political instrument, the surprising career of a concept and the difficulties involved in its implementation”, (No. EPFL-WORKING-170252), EPFL, 2011.

S. Sandu, “Smart specialization concept and the status of its implementation in Romania,” Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, Januaru 1, 2012, pp. 236-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00146-3

M. Piatkowski, T. Szuba, and G. Wolszczak, “Review of national and regional research and innovation strategies for smart specialization (RIS3) in Poland,” World Bank Group, Washington: DC, 2014.

I. Zarembo, A. Teilans, K. Barghorn, Y. Merkuryev, and G. Berina, “Methodology for Similarity Assessment of Relational Data Models and Semantic Ontologies,” In 2016 International Conference on Systems Informatics, Modelling and Simulation (SIMS), IEEE, June 1, 2016, pp. 119-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIMS.2016.21

S. M. Krammer, “Science, technology, and innovation for economic competitiveness: The role of smart specialization in less-developed countries,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, October 01, 2017, pp. 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.028

M. Pelse and M Lescevica, “Smart Specialization Assessment in Latvia,” In Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 42, April 15, 2016.

R. Oczkowska, S. Wiśniewska, and P. Lula, “Analysis of the Competence Gap among Vocational School Graduates in the Area of Smart Specialization in Poland,” International Journal for Quality Research, 11(4), December 1, 2017.

Nobanet, “Handbook on Internationalisation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Part III, University – Business cooperation: model development and experience from practice,” Nobanet Portal, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/3ecad9_effb2129b4b54131ae0aeada1bae82e3.pdf [Accessed February 09, 2019].

P. Kotnik and T Petrin, “Implementing a smart specialisation strategy: an evidence-based approach,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), March 2017, pp. 85-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852315574994

S. Nutley, H. Davies, and I. Walter, “Evidence-based policy and practice: cross-sector lessons from the United Kingdom,” Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 20, June 1, 2003, pp. 29-49.

M. Dosso, B.R. Martin, and P. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, “Towards evidence-based industrial research and innovation policy,” Science and Public Policy, 45(2), April 1, 2018, pp. 143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx073

European Commission, “Better regulation for better results—An EU agenda”, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strasbourg, May 19, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/documents/com_2015_215_en.pdf [Accessed February 12, 2019].

Nobanet, “E-business Study Course,” Eliademy LMS system, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://eliademy.com/app/a/org/2522 [Accessed February 19, 2019].

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

[1]
A. Andersons and J. Bushati, “SMART SPECIALISATION CONCEPT APPLICATION IN UNIVERSITIES: E-BUSINESS ONLINE STUDIES MODEL DEVELOPMENT”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 190–194, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.17770/etr2019vol2.4115.