THE GERMAN ENERGY TRANSITION AND ITS STUMBLING BLOCKS—PROMOTION OF POWER GENERATION FROM PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE GERMAN ENERGY TRANSITION

Authors

  • Lars Kempt Technical University Chemnitz Germany, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration (DE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2019vol1.4204

Keywords:

sustainable energy, sustainable development, solar energy, Germany

Abstract

The energy transition that began in Germany in 2000 is widely accepted by the population. Opinion research institutes report that more than 90 per cent agree with the policy adopted. Nevertheless, in the public debate in recent years increasingly critical opinions were voiced. In particular, the increased costs of the energy transitin are discussed, which are to be borne by the population and the economy. Despite increased burdens in all areas of the energy transition, the criticism is mostly due to the increased burden on electricity customers through the increased use of renewable energy. One reason for this is the increase in the Renewable Energy Act (EEG / Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz) surcharge, which finances the expansion of renewable energies and which ultimately has to be borne by the customers of the energy supply companies. This surcharge increased by 74 per cent in the years 2012 to 2014 alone. One of the main reasons for this was the excessive subsidization of electricity from photovoltaic systems from 2008 to 2012, which was primarily used by major investors and resulted in a massive expansion. Although the share of renewable energies in the German electricity mix has thus increased, an economic equivalent, such as a sustainable increase in jobs or high export figures among the companies that produce these plants, was not observed. Today, economists ask to what extent this mistake could have been avoided and to what extent this has damaged the reputation of the energy transition. The economic policy debate on this issue is led by various interest groups whose opinions are widely divergent. Establishing public consensus is difficult, yet essential for a successful continuation of the energy transition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, “Große Mehrheit für mehr Erneuerbare,” November 2018. [Online] Available: https://www.bmwi-energiewende.de/EWD/Redaktion/Newsletter/2018/10/Meldung/direkt-erfasst_infografik.html [Accessed: May 2, 2019].

Das Gesetz für den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – EEG), BGBl. 2000 I Nr. 13 pp. 305-309, Bonn, March 31, 2000.

§ 3 EEG, 2000.

§ 3 EEG, 2000.

§§ 4-8 EEG,2000.

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen e.V.,“ Bruttostromerzeugung in Deutschland ab 1990 nach Energieträgern,” [Online]. Available: https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/index.php?article_id=29&fileName=20181214_brd_stromerzeugung1990-2018.pdf. [Accessed: April 28, 2019].

Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st century, “Renewables 2018 - Global Status Report,” p. 25, 2019. [Online]. Available: http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/17-8652_GSR2018_FullReport_web_final_.pdf. [Accessed: May. 2, 2019].

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, “Große Mehrheit für mehr Erneuerbare,” Oktober 2018. p. 14 [Online] Available: https://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/EE/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/eeg-in-zahlen-pdf.pdf%3F__blob%3DpublicationFile [Accessed: May 2, 2019].

BTM Consult, “International Wind Energy Development,” Ringkøbing, Denmark, March 2004.

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen e.V.,“ Bruttostromerzeugung in Deutschland ab 1990 nach Energieträgern,” [Online]. Available: https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/index.php?article_id=29&fileName=20181214_brd_stromerzeugung1990-2018.pdf. [Accessed: April 28, 2019].

§ 11 EEG 2004.

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, “Installierte Leistung (kumuliert) der Photovoltaikanlagen in Deutschland in den Jahren 2000 bis 2018 (in Megawattpeak),” [Online]. Available: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/13547/umfrage/leistung-durch-solarstrom-in-deutschland-seit-1990/ [Accessed: May 20, 2019].

See also U. Leuschner, “Solarstrom-Förderung auf dem Tiefpunkt,” November 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.udo-leuschner.de/energie-chronik/151105d2.htm [Accessed: May. 2, 2019].

M. Murphy, T. Sigmund, U. Sommer, K. Stratmann and G. Weishaupt, “Deutsche Solarbranche vor der Sonnenfinsternis,” Handelsblatt, June 14, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.handelsblatt.com/. [Accessed: May 2, 2019].

SPD Bundestagsfraktion, “Die Energiewende - Kosten für Verbraucherinnen, Verbraucher und Unternehmen,” July 2012. [Online]. Available: www.spdfraktion.de/node/33311/pdf [Accessed: May 2, 2019].

Bundesverband Solarwirtschaft, “Anzahl der Beschäftigten in der Photovoltaikbranche in Deutschland in den Jahren 1998 bis 2016,” [Online]. Available: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/163993/umfrage/beschaeftigte-in-der-deutschen-photovoltaikbranche/ [Accessed: May 20, 2019].

K. Stratmann, “Wirtschaft sieht durch EEG-Umlage Zukunftsfähigkeit des Standorts Deutschland bedroht,” Handelsblatt, Oct. 13, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.handelsblatt.com/. [Accessed: May 2, 2019].

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

[1]
L. Kempt, “THE GERMAN ENERGY TRANSITION AND ITS STUMBLING BLOCKS—PROMOTION OF POWER GENERATION FROM PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THE GERMAN ENERGY TRANSITION”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 96–100, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.17770/etr2019vol1.4204.