Review-based Emergy Analysis of Energy Production

Ginta Cimdina, Toms Prodanuks, Dagnija Blumberga, Ivars Veidenbergs


The role of power and thermal energy is impossible to overestimate in development of both state economy sector and everyday life of households. Importance is connected with use of resources, economical feasibility and effect to climate changes. The optimization of energy production allows to promote development of sustainable society. The most popular and efficient technologies for generation of power and thermal energy are cogeneration plants (CHP). Traditional evaluation methodologies of energy production systems are based on analysis of energy and mass balances as well as on cost analysis. It is not enough for assessment of complete sustainability of system. Necessary environmental impact assessment of energy production is possible to implement by use of emergy analysis. Definition of emergy includes one type of energy, which is used directly or indirectly to produce materials, provide services and finances. Emergy dimension is emjoules (seJ.). Paper presents case study of emergy analysis of different operation modes of one cogeneration plant.


Emergy analysis; cogeneration; sustainability

Full Text:



Brown M. T. and Ulgiati S. Emergy analysis and environmental accounting. Encyclopedia of Energy, 2004, pp. 329–354.

Brown M. T. and Ulgiati S. Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems. J. Clean. Prod., 10. 2002, pp. 321–334.

Odum H. T., Environmental accounting: emergy and environment decision making. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1996.

Brown M. T. and Ulgiati S. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation. Ecol. Eng., 9. 1997, pp. 51–69.

Ulgiati S. A. Comprehensive Energy and Economic Assessment of Biofuels: When ‘Green’ Is Not Enough. CRC. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 20. 2001, pp. 71–106.

Hau J. L. and Bakshi B. R. Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol. Modell., 178. 2004, pp. 215–225.

Ulgiati S., Brown M. T., Bastianoni S., Marchettini N. Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate the sustainable use of resources. Ecol. Eng., 5. 1995, pp. 519–531.

Campbell D. E. and Garmestani A. S. An energy systems view of sustainability: Emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J. Environ. Manage., 95. 2012, pp. 72–97.

Brown M. T. and Ulgiati S. Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments. Popul. Environ., 22. 2001. pp. 471–501.

Ridolfi R. and Bastianoni S. Emergy. Encyclopedia of Ecology. 2008.

Neri E., Rugani B., Benetto E., Bastianoni S. Emergy evaluation vs. life cycle-based embodied energy (solar, tidal and geothermal) of wood biomass resources. Ecol. Indic., 2014, pp. 419–430.

Odum H. T. Emergy evaluation. Int. Work. Adv. Energy Stud. Energy flows Ecol. Econ. 1998.

Arbault D., Rugani B., Tiruta-Barna L., Benetto E. Emergy evaluation of water treatment processes. Ecol. Eng., 60. 2013, pp. 172–182.

Peng T., Lu H. F., Wu W. L., Campbell D. E., Zhao G. S., Zou J. H., Chen J. Should a small combined heat and power plant (CHP) open to its regional power and heat networks? Integrated economic, energy, and emergy evaluation of optimization plans for Jiufa CHP. Energy, 33. 2008, pp. 437–445.

Sha S. and Hurme M. Emergy evaluation of combined heat and power plant processes. Appl. Therm. Eng., 43. 2012, pp. 67–74.

Zhang G. and Long W. A key review on emergy analysis and assessment of biomass resources for a sustainable future. Energy Policy, 38. 2010, pp. 2948–2955.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

SCImago Journal & Country Rank