INDUSTRY 4.0:SOCIAL CHALLENGES AND RISKS

Authors

  • Gilberto Marzano Rezekne Academy of Technologies Rezekne, Latvia, Społeczna Akademia Nauk w Łodzi, Lodz (LV)
  • Luis Ochoa Siguencia Sport and Tourism management, Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach, Katowice (PL)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol2.6546

Keywords:

human-centered approach Industry 4.0, Internet of Everything, irony of automation

Abstract

Industry 4.0 is a term first introduced by the German government during the Hannover Messe fair in 2011 when it launched an initiative to support German industry in tackling future challenges. It refers to the 4th industrial revolution in which disruptive digital technologies, such as the Internet of Things (IoT), Internet of Everything (IoE), robotics, virtual reality (VR), and artificial intelligence (AI), are impacting industrial production.

The new industrial paradigms of Industry 4.0 demand a socio-technical evolution of the human role in production systems, in which all working activities of the value chain will be performed with smart approaches.

However, the automation of processes can have unpredictable effects.

Nowadays, in a smart factory, the role of human operators is often only to control and supervise the automated processes. This new condition of workers brought forth a paradox: malfunctions or irregularities in the automated production process are rare but challenging.

This article discusses the challenges and risks that the 4th industrial revolution is bringing to society.

It introduces the concept of the Irony of Automation. This propounds that the more reliable an automated system, the less human operators have to do and, consequently, the less attention they pay to the system while it is operating.

The authors go on to discuss the human-centered approach to automation, whose purpose is not necessarily to automate previously manual functions but, rather, to enhance user effectiveness and reduce errors.

 

Supporting Agencies
This paper was supported by the European project NewMetro (embeddiNg kEts and Work based learning into MEchaTROnic profile) - Project n. 600984-EPP-1-2018-1-IT-EPPKA2-SSA. This document reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained there in.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Qin, Y. Liu and R. Grosvenor, “A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond”, Procedia cirp, 52, 173-178, 2016.

H. Lasi, P. Fettke, H.G. Kemper, T. Feld, and M. Hoffmann, “Industry 4.0”, Business & information systems engineering, 6(4), 239-242, 2014.

A. Booth, A. Sutton and D. Papaioannou, D., Systematic approaches to a successful literature review, SAGE Publication, 2016.

J. Jesson, L. Matheson and F.M. Lacey, Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques. SAGE publication, 2011.

L. Bainbridge, “Ironies of automation”, Automatica, 19(6), pp. 775-779, 1983.

J. Rasmussen, “Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models”, IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, (3), pp. 257-266, 1983.

B. Strauch, “Ironies of automation: Still unresolved after all these years”, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(5), pp. 419-433, 2017.

T. Devezas and A. Sarygulov, Industry 4.0. Basel: Springer, 2017.

A. Sartal, R. Bellas, A. M. Mejías and A. García-Collado, “The sustainable manufacturing concept, evolution and opportunities within Industry 4.0: A literature review”, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 12(5), 2020.

A, Hansen, Full Recovery or Stagnation, New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1938.

P. Krugman, “Four observations on secular stagnation”, Secular stagnation: Facts, causes and cures, pp. 61-68, 2014.

E. Brynjolfsson and A. McAfee, The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, WW Norton & Company, 2014.

G. Marzano, M. Grewinsky, M. Kawa and J. Lizut, Towards changes of the labor market skills and competence, Elipsa, 2020.

L. Hennen, I. Van Keulen, I. Korthagen, G. Aichholzer, R. Lindner and R.Ø. Nielsen, European e-democracy in practice, 2020.

E. Fromm, Escape from freedom, Rinehart inc., 1941.

J. Ladyman, J. Lambert and K. Wiesner, “ What is a complex system?”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(1), 33-67, 2013.

A. Sebok and C. D. Wickens, “Implementing lumberjacks and black swans into model-based tools to support human–automation interaction”, Human factors, 59(2), 189-203, 2017.

R. Fikes and T. Garvey, “Knowledge Representation and Reasoning - A History of DARPA Leadership”, AI Magazine, 41(2), pp. 9-21, 2020.

J. Qin, “Knowledge organization and representation under the AI lens”, Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(1), pp. 3-17, 2020.

G. Alor-Hernández and R. Valencia-García, (Eds.). Current trends on knowledge-based systems (Vol. 1). Springer International Publishing, 2017.

C. M. Mitchell, C.M. “Human-Centered Automation: A Philosophy, Some Design Tenets, and Related Research”, In Human Interaction with Complex Systems (pp. 377-381). Springer, 1996.

D. D. Woods, J. Tittle, M. Feil and A. Roesler, “Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 34(2), pp. 210-218, 2004.

B. Shneiderman, “Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy”, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), pp. 495-504, 2004.

S. Musić and S. Hirche, “Control sharing in human-robot team interaction”, Annual Reviews in Control, 44, pp. 342-354, 2017.

S. Nyholm and J. Smids, “Automated cars meet human drivers: responsible human-robot coordination and the ethics of mixed traffic”, Ethics and Information Technology, pp. 1-10, 2018.

M. O. Riedl, “Human‐centered artificial intelligence and machine learning”, Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(1), pp. 33-36, 2019.

A. Schmidt, “Interactive Human Centered Artificial Intelligence: A Definition and Research Challenges”, In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 1-4), Sptember 2020.

S. Karajz, “The impact of Industry 4.0 on the processes of social innovation”, Theory Methodology Practice: Club of Economics in Miskolc, 17(SI), pp. 3-10, 2021.

H. Muslim and M. Itoh, “A theoretical framework for designing human-centered automotive automation systems”, Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(4), pp. 685-697, 2019.

M. Dawson, “Cyber security in industry 4.0: The pitfalls of having hyperconnected systems”, Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 10(1), pp. 19-28, 2018.

K. Schwab, The fourth industrial revolution. Currency, 2017.

G. Marzano and A. Martinovs, “Teaching Industry 4.0”, In SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 69-76), May 2020.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-17

How to Cite

[1]
G. Marzano and L. Ochoa Siguencia, “INDUSTRY 4.0:SOCIAL CHALLENGES AND RISKS”, ETR, vol. 2, pp. 100–105, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol2.6546.