WATER DISCHARGE MEASURING INSTRUMENTS: AN UP TO DATE OVERVIEW

Authors

  • Artem Iukhno State Hydrological Institute (SHI) Saint Petersburg (RU)
  • Sergei Buzmakov State Hydrological Institute (SHI) Saint Petersburg (RU)
  • Alisa Zorina State Hydrological Institute (SHI) Saint Petersburg (RU)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol3.6613

Keywords:

Current meters, water discharge, hydrological survey, hydrological measuring instruments classification, hydrological devices

Abstract

Technological progress could not but affect the sphere of hydrometric measurements. New instruments have been implemented to add to such traditional measuring instruments as mechanical current meters or to replace them. Over the past 20 years, the number of different types measuring instruments has increased dramatically. That is why the analytical review and classification of these devices are needed to help with making appropriate management decisions in the field of streamflow monitoring and surveys. The article presents the multivariable classification of measuring instruments, based on such factors as: morphology scaling (channel width and depth), measuring conditions (open, weed or ice-covered channel), logistical factor (mobile or stationary) and required accuracy. Characteristics of each type of measuring instruments were also considered and the limitations of their applicability were described. The results presented in the paper are expected to expand the horizons of approaches used for estimation of water discharge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

P. Dobriyal, R. Badola, Ch. Tuboi & S.A. Hussain, "A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management", Applied Water Science, Vol. 7, pp. 2617-2628, Oct. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0488-y

K. D. Jensen, "Flow measurements", J. of the Braz. Soc. of Mech. Sci. & Eng., Vol. 26 №4, pp. 400-419, Dec. 2004, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-58782004000400006

R. Gravelle, "Discharge Estimation: Techniques and Equipment". Geomorphological Techniques, Chap. 3, Sec. 3.5, British Society for Geomorphology, pp. 1-8, 2015.

J. Senthil Kumar, A. Kamaraj, C.K. Sundaram, G. Shobana, and G. Kirubakaran, "A comprehensive review on accuracy in ultrasonic flow measurement using reconfigurable systems and deep learning approaches", AIP Advances 10, Vol. 10, Issue 10, (2020), pp. 1063-1078, July 2020, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0022154

Technical standard of Russian Federation R 52.18.851-2016, "The main measuring instruments of the hydrometeorological purpose, used on the national observation network", Dec.2016.

D.P. Turnipseed, V.B. Sauer, "Discharge measurements at gaging stations: U.S. Geological Survey: Techniques and Methods", book 3, chap. A8, 87 pp., 2010, https://doi.org/10.3133/tm3A8

J.C. Bathurst, "Tests of three discharge gauging techniques in mountain rivers", Hydrology of Mountainous Area, Vol. 190, pp. 93-100, 1990.

Official Laboratory of the Hydrological Instruments page in the web-site of the State Hydrological Institute (SHI) [Web-site. Online]. Available: http://www.hydrology.ru/en/structure/department-hydrological-instruments [Accessed March 3, 2021].

D.E. Klimenko, "Development of hydrometric mechanical current meters in Russia and abroad", Geographical Bulletin of Perm’ University, Vol.2, 13 pp., 2010.

WMO Manual on stream gauging, "Volume 1 - Fieldwork", WMO working paper № 1044, 252 pp., 2010.

Environment Canada Manual Book 3-A22, "Measuring discharge with acoustic Doppler current profilers from a moving boat" version adapted for Water Survey of Canada, 62 pp., 2013.

P. Campbell, Materials of the Water Survey of Canada, "Standard operating procedures for under ice discharge measurements using ADCPs. Version 2", 45 pp., 2015.

K. Yokoyama, N. Kashiwaguma, T. Okubo, Y. Takeda, "Flow Measurement in an Open Channel by UVP", 4th International Symposium on Ultrasonic Doppler Method for Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Engineering Materials,, pp. 55-58, 2004, https://www.isud-conference.org/proc/split/ISUD-04_055_Yokoyama.pdf

Standard ISO 9213:2004, "Measurement of total discharge in open channels — Electromagnetic method using a full-channel-width coil"

H. Ryckborst & R. O. Christie, "Feasibility of electromagnetic streamflow measurements using the earth's field", Hydrological Sciences Journal, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 241-255, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667709491715

National Environmental Monitoring Standards (NEMS), "Open Channel Flow Measurement: Measurement, Processing and Archiving of Open Channel Flow Data", pp. 77, 2013.

M.L. Soupir, S. Mostaghimi, C.E. Mitchem Jr., "A comparative study of stream-gaging techniques for low-flow measurements in two Virginia tributaries", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, Vol. 45 (1), pp. 110-122, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00264.x

Official website of the "Open channel flow manufacture" [Web-site. Online]. Available: https://www.openchannelflow.com/ [Accessed February 20, 2021].

A. J. Clemmens, T.L. Wahl, M.G. Bos, J.A. Replogle, "Water Measurement with Flumes and Weirs", International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 384 pp., 2001.

Salt dilution techniques materials on the official website of the Fathom Scientific Ltd. [Web-site. Online]. Available: https://www.fathomscientific.com/category/hydrometrics/salt-dilution/ [Accessed February 20, 2021].

N.V. Ukhov, M.V. Ushakov, "Determination of water discharge in minor rivers by physical and chemical parameters", Scientific notes of the RSHU, Vol. 57, pp. 38-45, 2019.

R.E. Anthony, R.C. Aster, S. Ryan, S. Rathbur, M.G. Baker, "Water current measurements using oceanographic bottom lander LoTUS", Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, Vol. 123, pp. 210-228, 2017.

M. Kjelldorffa, J. Kuttenkeulera, N. Kirchnerb, J. Krützfeldta, M. Sundberg, "Water current measurements using oceanographic bottom lander LoTUS", Applied ocean research, Vol. 94, 13 pp., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2019.101982

W. Lia, Q. Liaob, Q. Ranc, "Stereo-imaging LSPIV (SI-LSPIV) for 3D water surface reconstruction and discharge measurement in mountain river flows", Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 578, 12 pp., Nov. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124099

K. P. Hilgersom and W. M. J. Luxemburg, "Technical Note: How image processing facilitates the rising bubble technique for discharge measurement", Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., Vol. 16, pp. 345–356, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-16

How to Cite

[1]
A. Iukhno, S. Buzmakov, and A. Zorina, “WATER DISCHARGE MEASURING INSTRUMENTS: AN UP TO DATE OVERVIEW”, ETR, vol. 3, pp. 116–123, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.17770/etr2021vol3.6613.