PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN TEACHER AND SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENT THROUGH LEARNING MATHEMATICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol2.1396Keywords:
learning mathematics, partnership, secondary school students, teachersAbstract
This article examines secondary school student and teachers cooperation through learning mathematics. The aim of the study is to find out whether the teacher and student cooperation is a partnership. The partnership is viewed as a cooperation where involved work toward mutual goals. Secondary school student - teacher partnership is possible if the teacher trusts students and together with them chooses the learning objectives, the teaching aids and methods of learning. Students take responsibility for their choices and they are motivated to accomplish them if there is possibility to make a choice. The article deals with teachers' views on teaching and students' opinions about what helps and what interferes learning mathematics.
Downloads
References
Alijevs, R.(1999). Vidusskolēnu jaunrade mācībās. Rīga: RaKa.
Baltušīte, R. (2006). Skolotāja loma mācīšanās motivācijā. Rīga: RaKa.
Boaler, J. (2009). The Elephant in the classroom. Helping children learn and love maths. Souvenir Press Ltd.
Cox-Petersen, A. (2011). Educational Partnerships, Connecting Schools, Families, and the Community. SAGE.
Fullan, M., Langworthy, M. (2014). A Rich Seam, How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson.
Gregory, G. H., Chapman, C. (2007). Differentiated Instructional strategies. One size Doesn’t fit. Corwin press.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for teachers, maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. USA&Canada: Routledge.
Kline, N. (2015). More Time to Think: The Power of Independent thinking. London: Cassell.
Kons, I. (1985). Vecāko klašu skolēnu psiholoģija. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Lāce, G.(2010). Latvijas pamatskolas matemātikas skolotāju kompetence matemātikas didaktikā. Promocijas darbs. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.
Mansell, W. (Ed.) (2012). Traditional teaching methods still dominant in math classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.manchester.ac.uk/discover/news/traditional-teaching-methods-still-dominant-in-maths-classrooms
Maslo, E. (2003). Mācīšanās spēju pilnveide. Rīga: RaKa.
Maslo, I. (1995). Skolas pedagoģiskā procesa diferenciācija un individualizācija. Rīga: RaKa.
Prensky, M. (2010). Teaching digital natives, partnering for real learning. USA: Corwin Press.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional – design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Industrial Theory, Vol. 2, Mahwah, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rutka, L.(2012). Pedagoga psiholoģiskā kompetence. Rīga: RaKa.
Sahlberg, P. (2010). Finnish lessons. What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Sousa, D., Tomlinson, C. A. (2011). Differentiation and the brain. How Neuroscience supports the learner Friendly classroom. Solution Press Tree.
Špona, A. (2006). Audzināšanas process teorijā un praksē. Rīga: RaKa.
Štenberga, A. (2013). Pedagoģiskā psiholoģija. Rīga: RaKa.
The development of judgment and decision making in children and adolescents (2005). Jacobs, J. B., Klaczynski P. A. (Eds.) Psychology Press.
Žogla, I. (2001). Didaktikas teorētiskie pamati. Rīga: Raka.
Рубинштейн, С. Л. (2000). Основы общей психологии. Издательство «Питер».
