KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY IN THE SYSTEM OF CONTINUOUS EDUCATION OF UKRAINE

Оlena Burunova, Sergii Gushko, Volodymyr Kulishov

Abstract


The article investigates the issues and challenges associated with the variability, mobility of technologies of education, development of the conceptual framework based on modernization of economic education, formation of professional knowledge of future specialists of an economic profile in the system of continuous economic education in the conditions of the educational and scientific complex “school-college-university” and the ability economically expedient of such system of knowledge. The economic efficiency of the system of professional knowledge could be achieved through a scientific justification of the project-creative component that is not investigated enough. And there is necessity to implement this experimental innovative component of the professional economic training.

In the process of the research the authors worked out a theoretical cluster system model of knowledge-based economy by applying latest innovative technologies where intersubjective innovative connections are available. The research results involve clarification of the following concepts essence “modernisation of the system of professional knowledge in economics” and “future specialists in the sphere of economics”; introduction of a project-creative approach in an educational-scientific complex “a school with its economic specialization – a college of economics – a university of economics” under conditions of continuous economic education.

 


Keywords


education; knowledge; economic; system; specialist

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azzam, Amy M. (2009). Why Creativity Now? A Conversation with Sir Ken Robinson. Teaching for the 21st Century, September, vol. 67, no. 1, 22-26, retrieved 26 January 2015, http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/sept09/vol67/num01/Why-Creativity-Now%C2%A2-A-Conversation-with-Sir-Ken-Robinson.aspx.

Bloom, B.S., Masia, B.B., Krathwohl, D.R. (1964). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Volume II: The Affective Domain. N.Y.: McKay.

Carrol, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record. May, 723-730.

Dewey, J. (1940). My Pedagogic Creed Education Today. Edited and with a Foreword by Joseph Rather. C.P. Putnam‘s Sons. – New York. Р. 3–17.

Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101.

Kryński, A., Kuliszow, W., Guszko, S. (2015). Program «Podwójny dyplom: współczesne realia». Globalne aspekty Gospodarstwa Światowego i Stosunków Międzynarodowych w warunkach niestabilności gospodarki: materiały Międzynarodowej Naukowo-Praktycznej Konferencji Studenckiej, Częstochowa, Akademia Polonijna.

Mishkin, F. S. (1999). Learning from the market: Integrating The Stock Game across the Curriculum. New York: National Council on Economic Education.

Padalka, O., Kulishov, V. (2015). National and European education: achievements and acquision. European pedagogical studies / Association of Rectors of Pedagogical Universities in Europe; ed. board V. Andrushchenko (head) [and others]. – Issue 5-6. – K.: Publishing house of the National Pedagogical Dragomanov University.

Yankelovich, A. (1996). National Survey of Economic Education. N.-Y.: Philips Petroleum Co.

Кулішов, В. (2011). Методичні засади формування економічної компетентності у процесі підготовки фахівців технологій. [Монографія]. К.: Каравела.

Падалка, О. (2012). Економіка освіти та управління: [навчальний посібник]. К.: Педагогічна думка.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol1.1508

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.