Krists Jānis Lazdiņš, Kristīne Mārtinsone


The aim of research was to examine characteristics of individual value system prediction for driving behavior. It raised fundamental question for the research: 1. which of the individual value system characteristics predict driving behavior controlling gender and age.
In the study participated 108 respondents, 40 (37.0%) men and 68 (63.0%) women who filled the questionnaire on the internet. There was used two questionnaires – „Latvian driving behavior survey”, The value and levels of availability relations in different spheres of life”
The results showed that the value system integrity / disintegrity indicator predicts distracted driving, explains 18% of variation and is statistically significantly. Internal vacuum and age statistically significantly negatively predicts risky driving explaining 17% of variation. Age statistically significantly predicts safe and courteous driving, explains 12% of variation. Value system integrity / disintegrity indicator and gender, statistically significantly negatively predicts summary indicator of dangerous driving, explains 22% of variation. Age statistically significantly negatively predicts distracted driving, explains 30% of variation.
Limitations of the research are related to the size of the sample, alignment of participants and use of new instruments, as well as data collection method. If the study would be repeated in the future, it would be desirable to increase the sample size and use approbated instrument. It would be interesting to find out how the value of individual factors predicts objective size of accidents and violations caused by driving.
The results can serve as the basis to create new driving behavior interventions and also applicable to psychologist's professional work, when counseling individuals of this group, as well as can be used in the future development of the field, science and research.


aggressive driving; distracted driving; driving behavior; individual values; risky driving; safe driving

Full Text:



Ceļu Satiksmes Drošības Direkcija (2015). 2004. - 2014. gados notikušo Ceļu satiksmes negadījumu, tajos bojā gājušo un ievainoto skaits

Deffenbacher, J. L., Petrilli, R. T., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Swaim, R. C. (2003). The Driver’s Angry Thoughts Questionnaire: A measure of angry cognitions when driving. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 383–402.

Dewar, R. E., & Olson, P. L. (2002). Human factors in traffic safety.Tuscon, AZ: Lawyers & Judges Pub.

Jirgena, S. (1999). Jauniešu pašizjūta un adiktīvas uzvedības izvēle. Promocijas darbs. Rīga: LU.

Krahe B., & Fenske I. (2002). Predicting aggressive driving behavior: the role of Macho personality, age, and power of car. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 21–29.

Lancaster R., Ward R. (2002). The contribution of individual factors to driving behaviour: Implications for managing work-related road safety. Research Report. HSE Contract Research Report: HSE Books, 3-60.

Lazdiņš K.J., Mārtinsone K., (2014). Autovadītāju agresijas un braukšanas uzvedības saistība ar personīgās automašīnas jaudu un virsbūves tipu. Nepublicēts bakalaura darbs.

Muzikante I., (2008). Vērtības, attieksmes un autovadītāju uzvedība uz ceļa. Promocijas darbs.

Muzikante I., Reņģe V. (2008). Autovadītāju individuālo vērtību saistība ar riskantu braukšanu. LU raksti, 768. 39-50.

Özkan T., & Lajunen T. (2005). Why are there sex differences in risky driving? The relationship between sex and gender-role on aggressive driving. traffic offences, and accident involvement among young Turkish drivers. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 547–558.

Perepjolkina V., Voita D. (2011). Latvijas Autovadītāju uzvedības aptauja. Tehniskā atskaite. Nepublicēts.

Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2010). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The role of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

Stradling, S. G., & Parker, D. (1997). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm, instrumental beliefs and affective beliefs in predicting driving violations.

Tasca L. (2000). A review of literature on aggressive driving research. Aggressive Driving Issues Conference. 1-11.

Underwood, G., Chapman, P., Wright, S., & Crundall, D. (1997) Estimating accident liability.

World health organisation. (2013). Global status report on road safety 2013: supporting a decade of action.

Фанталова Е.Б. (2001). Диагностика и психотерапия внутреннего конфликта. Самара: БАХРАХ-М.



  • There are currently no refbacks.