GIFTED PUPILS’ LEARNING LINKS
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 233-250.
Aldrige, J. M., Fraser, B. J. (1997). Examining Science Classroom Environments in a Cross-National Study. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum 1997. Retrieved from: http://www.waier.org.au/forums/1997/aldridge.html
Beattie, V., Collins, B., Mcinnes, B. (1997). Deep and surface learning: a simple or simplistic dichotomy? Accounting Education, 6(1), 1-12.
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y. P. (2001). The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
Brown, S., White, S., Wakeling, L., Naiker, M. (2015). Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) in an Introductory Course in Chemistry. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 12(3).
Dukynaitė, R., Stundža, M. (2016a). Tarptautinis matematikos ir gamtos mokslų tyrimas TIMSS 2015. Rezultatų pristatymas. Retrieved from: http://www.nec.lt/failai/6502_TIMSS_2015_pristatymas_2016-11-29.pdf
Dukynaitė, R., Stundža, M. (2016b). EBPO PISA rezultatų pristatymas. Retrieved from: http://www.nec.lt/failai/6561_PISA_2015_pristatymas_2016_12_06_12val.pdf
Entwistle, N. (2000a). Contrasting Perspectives on Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. Entwistle (Eds.). The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education (3 nd ed., pp. 3–22). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Centre for Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
Entwistle, N., Tait, H., McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XV (1), 33-48.
Garn, A., C., Jolly, J. L. (2014). High Ability Students’ Voice on Learning Motivation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1), 7-24.
Howie, P., Bagnall, R. (2013). A critique of the deep and surface approaches to learning model. Teaching in Higher Education, 18 (4), 389-400.
Lietuva. Švietimas šalyje ir regionuose Mokinių pasiekimai (2016). Vilnius: Švietimo aprūpinimo centras. Retrieved from: https://www.smm.lt/uploads/lawacts/docs/579_fe74d41af353e5b42b4c4b27f24e8fce.pdf
Pouliot, Ch., Bader, B., Therriault, G. (2010). The Notion of Relationship to Knowledge: a Theoretical Tool for Research in Science Education. International Journal of Enviromental & Science Education, 5 (3), 239-264.
Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the Role of Gifted Education and Talend Development: for the 21 st Century: a Four-part Teorical Approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56 (3), 150-159.
Samardzija, N., Peterson, J. S. (2015). Learning and Classroom Preferences of Gifted Eighth Graders: A Qualitative Study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 233-256.
Trigwell, K., Ashwin, P. Millan, E. S. (2013). Evoked prior learning experience and approach to learning as predictors of academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 363-378.
Zhang, L. F. (2000). University students‘ Learning Approaches in Three Cultures: An Investigation of Biggs‘s 3P Model. The Journal of Psychology, 134 (1), 37-55.
Wong, E., Kwong, T., Thadani, D. R. (2014). The Effects of Students’ Perceptions of their Learning Experience on their Approaches to Learning: The Learning Experience Inventory in Courses (LEI-C). Education Journal, 3 (6), 369-376.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol2.2428
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.