TECHNOFERENCE, CONFLICTS, SATISFACTION WITH COUPLE’S RELATIONSHIPS AND EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE CONNECTION

Aija Dudkina, Lida Maslinovska, Juris Porozovs

Abstract


The purpose of the study Tehnoference, conflict, satisfaction with couple’ s relationships and emotional intelligence connection is to find out is there a relationship to technology and the frequency of conflicts in couple relationships, satisfaction with relationships and emotional intelligence. Main questions of the study: 1.Is there a connection to the technoference and the frequency of conflicts in the relationship? 2.Is the frequency of conflicts in a relationship related to satisfaction with relationships? 3.Is there a relationship to an emotional intelligence with a technofrence? 4.Is there a relationship between emotional intelligence and satisfaction with relationships?

Keywords


tehnoference; technology use; couple relationship; relationship satisfaction; conflict; emotional intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G. (2012). Me, my souse and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online roleplaying games (MMORPGs). Journal of Leisure Research, 44, 1–22.

Austin, E.J., Saklofske, D.H., & Egan, H. (2007). Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 547-558.

Beranuy, M.,Oberst, U., Carbonell, X. & Chamarro, A. (2009). Problematic Internet and mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: The role of emotional intelligence. Computers in human behavior Volume 25, Issue 5, 1182-1187.

Brackett, M. A., Warner, R. M., & Bosco, J. S. (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal Relationships, 12, 197–212. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2.

Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. H. (2000).Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980.

Brenner, J., & Smith, A. (2013). 72% of online adults are social networking site users. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http:// www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/social-networ king-sites/Findings.aspx .

Chapman, B.P., & Hayslip, Jr.B. (2006). Emotional Intelligence in Young and Middle Adulthood: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Latent Structure and Means. Psychology and Aging, Vol. 21, No. 2, 411–418.

Coyne, S.M., & McDaniel, T.B. (2016) “Technoference”: The Interference of Technology in Couple Relationships and Implications for Women’s Personal and Relational Well-Being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, 85–98.

Coyne, S.M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D.M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 60.

Crasta, D., Fincham, F.D., Rogge, R.D., & Maniaci, M.R. (2017). Positive and Negative Evaluation of Relationships: Development and Validation of the Positive–Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale. Psychological Assessment 2017, Vol. 29, No. 8, 1028–1043.

Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E., & Smith, H.L. (1999).Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

Elphinston, R.A., & Noller, P. (2011).Time to face it!Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 631–635.

Engelberg, E.,& Sjöberg, L. (2004). Internet use, social skills and adjustment. Cyber psychology & Behavior, 7 (1), pp. 41-47.

Fincham, F.D., & Bradbury, T.N. (1987).The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 797– 809.

Fincham, F.D., & Linfield, K.J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489–502.

Fincham, F.D., Rogge, R.D., & Beach, S.R.H. (in press). Relationship satisfaction.In D. Perlman & A.L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Cambridge handbookof personal relationships. Cambridge.

Fitness, J. (2001).Emotional intelligence in intimate relationship. In J. Ciarrochi, J.P. Forgas, & J.D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in everyday life (pp. 98–112). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

Funk, & Rogge (2007), Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 572-583.

Gentile, D.A., Coyne, S.M., & Bricolo, F. (2013). Pathological technology addictions: What is scientifically known and what remains to be learned. In K. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp. 382–402). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Glenn, N.D.,& Weaver, C.N. (1981).The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 161–168.

Greenhaus, J.H., & Beutell, N.J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 76–88.

Hendrick, S.S., Hendrick, C., & Adler, N.L. (1988).Romantic relationships: Love, satisfaction, and staying together. Journal of Personality.

Krasta, E. (2016). Piedošanas motivācijas saistība ar laulāto apmierinātību ar attiecībām. LU, nepublicēts bakalaura darbs.

Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P.S., & Caruso, D.R., G. (2000). Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence. Emotion, 1, 232–242.

McCain, J.L., & Campbell, W.K. (2016). Narcissism and Social Media Use: A MetaAnalytic Review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication.

Petrides, K. A., & Furnham, A. (2001).Trait emotional intelligence: Psychometric investigation with reference to established trait taxonomies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 423–448.

Rainie, L., & Keeter, S. (2006). Americans and their cell phones. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2006/Americans-and-their-cell-phones.aspx.

Rusbult, C.E., Martz, J.M., & Agnew, C.R. (1998).The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–387.

Schröder-Abé, M., & Schütz, A. (2011). Walking in each other’s shoes: Perspective taking mediates effects of emotional intelligence on relationship quality. European Journal of Personality, 25, 155–169. doi: 10.1002/per.818.

Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., et al. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.

Smith, A. (2013). Smartphone ownership 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Smart phone-Ownership-2013/Findings.aspx.

Spanier, G. B. (1996). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.

Spradlin, A., Cuttler, C., Bunce, J.P., & Carrier, L.M. (2017). #Connected: Facebook May Facilitate Face-to-Face Relationships for Introverts. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication.

Zeidner, M., & Kaluda, I. (2008). Romantic love: What’s emotional intelligence (EI) got to do with it? Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1684–1695.

Zeidner, M., Kloda, I., & Matthews, G. (2013). Does Dyadic Coping Mediate the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Marital Quality? Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 27, No. 5, 795–805.

Zickuhr, K. (2013). Tablet ownership 2013. Pew Internet & American Life Project.Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tablet- Ownership-2013/Findings.aspx.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3262

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.