EXPLORING THE INPUT OF COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TO GOAL-SETTING IN VARIOUS TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS

Authors

  • Anete Butkēviča University of Latvia
  • Uldis Zandbergs Baltic Computer Academy Ltd.
  • Dace Namsone University of Latvia
  • Signe Briķe Baltic Computer Academy Ltd.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3280

Keywords:

competence assessment, management, organizational goal-setting

Abstract

The aim of the present research is to investigate the existing practices of linking competence assessment to organizational goal-setting in various organisations in Latvia. The importance of linking employee competences to goal-setting within organizations has been established in scientific literature. Nevertheless, there is evidence gathered in this interdisciplinary research that existing methods of competence assessment used by various organizations in Latvia do not translate well into organizational goal-setting. The research is based on information gathered from semi-structured interviews with representatives of managerial positions in private and public, including educational service organizations (26 in total). Additionally, publicly available development plans are analysed. Empirical data are analysed according to a conceptual framework of criteria impacting the goal-setting process. Three subsets of criteria are used that guided interview question formulation and interview data analysis: formulation of a goal; employee’s ability to reach the assigned goal; employee’s self-assessment on his/her ability to reach the assigned goal. Analysis of the results indicate that when setting goals and assessing employee competences in relation to those goals, management decisions are greatly guided by subjective approaches. Such identified approaches in observed private and public service organizations indicate common risks that are discussed in this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Anete Butkēviča, University of Latvia
    The Interdisciplinary Center for Educational Innovation
  • Dace Namsone, University of Latvia
    The Interdisciplinary Center for Educational Innovation

References

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management - Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. London, UK: Kogan Page.

Bandura, A. (2013). The role of self-efficacy in goal-based motivation. In E. A. Locke, & G. P. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance, 147-157. New York: Taylor & Francis,

Berrell, M., & Huan, M. (2004). Management by Objectives: the supervisor's role in MBO in China. Proceedings of ASBBS 7th International Conference, Cairns, Australia.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open?. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884.

Campion, M., Fin, A., Ruggeberg, B., Carr, L., Phillips, G., & Odman, R. (2011). Doing Competencies Well: Best Practices. Personnel Psycholog, 64, 225-262.

DuBrin, A. J. (2012). Essentials of management. Mason, OH: Cengage South-Western.

Echols, E. (2007). Learning’s role in talent management. Chief Learning Officer, 6(10), 36-40.

European Commision (2008, August). Regulas Nr. 800/2008 1. pielikums Mazo un vidējo uzņēmumu definīcija. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/LV/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008R0800 [Retrieved 04.03.2018]

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (9-40). Springer, Dordrecht.

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Michielsen, M., & Moeyaert, B. (2009). Employee Retention: Organisational and Personal Perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 2, 195-215.

Klein, H. J., Cooper, J. T., & Monahan, C. A. (2013). Goal commitment. In E. A. Locke, & G. P. Latham, New developments in goal setting and task performance, 65-89. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Latham, G. (2003). Goal setting: A five-step approach to behavior change. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 309-318.

Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

Lunenburg, F. (2011). Goal-Setting Theory of Motivation. International journal of management, business, and administration, 15(1), 1-5.

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence." American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14.

OECD. (2016). Education in Latvia, Reviews of National Policies for Education, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264250628-en [Retrieved 04.03.2018].

Prahalad, C. K., & Hammel, G. (1990). The Core Competency of a Corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.

Rodriguez, R. (2008). Learning’s impact on talent flow. Chief Learning Officer, 7(4), 50–64.

Seijts, G., Latham, G., Tasa, K., & Latham, B. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227-239.

Tompkins, J. (2005). Organization theory and public management. Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-25

How to Cite

Butkēviča, A., Zandbergs, U., Namsone, D., & Briķe, S. (2018). EXPLORING THE INPUT OF COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT TO GOAL-SETTING IN VARIOUS TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 6, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3280