SOME CHALLENGES IN CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARATIVE RESEARCH

Alex Krouglov

Abstract


The paper examines the application of qualitative methods in comparative research in a recent international project Industrial Relations in Multilingual Environments at Work (IR MultiLing) which explored how the use of languages other than a dominant language may affect labour relations in various work situations in Europe. The novelty of the current research covered in this paper lies in the fact that it investigates some challenges in developing the best ways of creating an analytical framework when conducting cross-cultural research involving multinational teams of researchers from France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. It also analyses approaches in completing an effective comparison of the contexts and findings across various cultures. Although, there are many examples of qualitative research in literature, this paper aims at exploring some credible approaches in conducting cross-cultural research by international teams of scholars at several key stages: desk research and contextualisation, identifying clear parameters for fieldwork, systematising and comparing findings of the research. The purpose of this research is to provide guidance and some tools to researchers engaged in cross-cultural comparative research using qualitative methods.

 


Keywords


cross-cultural comparative research; labour relations; qualitative methods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alheit, P. (2013). Identifying configurations of higher education: Reflections on concepts that

compare complex cultural settings. Studies in the Education of Adults, 45:2, 194–209. DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2013.11661651

Elias, N. (1971). Sociology of Knowledge: New Perspectives: Part One. Sociology, 5:2, 149–168. DOI: 10.1177/003803857100500201

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1968). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

Johns, G. (1991). Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organisational research. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 80–104.

Johns, G. (2001). In praise of context: commentary. Journal of Organisational Behavior, 22, 31–42.

Jordan, B., Stråth, B., & Triandafyllidou, A. (2003). Contextualising immigration policy implementation in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 29:2, 195–224. DOI: 10.1080/1369183032000079594

King, N., Harrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2019). Interviews in Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Little, S., Holmes, L., & Grieco, M. (2001). Calling up culture: Information spaces and information flows as the virtual dynamics of inclusion and exclusion. Information Technology & People, 14:4, 353–367. DOI:10.1108/09593840110411158

Murphy, P., Sheard, K., & Waddington, I. (2000). Figurational sociology and its application to sport. In J. Coakley & E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of sports studies (92-105). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol3.3694

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.