TEACHER’S SELF-DEVELOPMENT: TEACHER’S SELF-DISCOVERIES REGARDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PEDAGOGICAL PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT DURING PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE

Authors

  • Ilga Kušnere Latvijas Universitāte (LV)
  • Aivis Dombrovskis Latvijas Universitāte (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.4002

Keywords:

lifelong education, personality development, self-evaluation, self- management, self-observation, teacher

Abstract

In the 21st century, a special place in education is occupied by sustainable development issues, which emphasize the unique role of education in shaping the public opinion. New pedagogical approaches, which show how education could contribute to the evolution of consciousness, are being sought. A shift of paradigms is happening in education: from knowledge memorization to skills, character, meta-learning (Education 2030: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development competency framework). The research confirms, to successfully implement the proposed changes in modern pedagogical practice, it is valuable for the teachers to learn the psychology methods and techniques on how to improve and advance personality growth based on the knowledge shared by K.G. Jung, K. Wilber, and A. Maslow. research confirms it is valuable to acquire these methods during theoretical and practical activities for professional development.

The study revealed that teacher’s professional competencies, such as communicative, methodological, organizational, creative skills and self-management, improve through familiarization and practical application of this knowledge.

The aim of the study is to show the importance of how the psychological insights regarding the development of personality impact the pedagogical practice. Main tasks include literature studies and evaluation, working with a target audience. Research methods: survey.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlers, Ā. (1992). Psiholoģija un dzīve. Rīga: Idea.

Biesta, G.J.J. (2017). The Rediscovery of Teaching. Routledge.

Delors, J. (1996). Learning: the Treasure Within – Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education forthe Twenty-first Century, UNESCO.

Dispenza, Dž. (2015). Atbrīvojies no ieraduma spēka. Rīga: SIA” Lietusdārzs”.

Dispenza, Dž. (2016). Tu esi placebo. Rīga: SIA” Lietusdārzs”.

Ēriksons, E.H. (1998). Identitāte, jaunība un krīze. Rīga: Jumava.

Freids, Z. (1996). Kādas ilūzijas nākotne. Rīga: Intelekts.

Grofs, S. (2006). Nākotnes psiholoģija (Psychology of the Future). Rīga: RaKa.

Jungs, K.G. (1996). Psiholoģiskie tipi. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.

Jungs, K.G. (2009). Psiholoģiskie tipi un māksla. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Yates, G.C.R. (2013). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. Routledge.

Hattie, J., &. Zierer, K. (2018). 10 Mindframes for Visible Learning. Routledge.

Marope, M. (2017). Future Competences for Future Generations: preparing learners for the future we don’t know. In Focus: UNESCO IBE, pp 80 – 89.

Maslow, A.(1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4).Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.

Myers, D. (2009). Social psychology.New York:McGraw – Hill Higher Education.

NRC (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (eds.). Committee on Defning Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, National Research Council (NRC). Pieejams: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.phprecord_id=13398 .

Oberman, L., & Ramachandran,V. (2009). Reflections on the Mirror Neutron System: Theyr Evolutionary Functions Beyond Motor Representation. the role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition. New York city.:Humana Press.

Pipere, A. (2011). Datu ieguves metodes pētījumā un to raksturojums. No K.Mārtinsone (sast.), Ievads pētniecībā: stratēģijas, dizaini, metodes. Rīga: RaKa.

Rudzītis, R. (2008). Uguns mācība. Izdevniecība: Antēra.

Rogers, C. (1959) A theory of therapy personality and interpersonal relationships as developed in the client centered framework. A study of a science, Vol.3. New York:McGrav Hill.

Robinsons, K. (2013). Ne tikai ar prātu (Out of our minds). Rīga: Zvaigzne.

Skinner, B.F. (1979). The shapping of behaviorist. New York: Knopf.

Špona, A., & Čamane, I. (2009). Audzināšana Pašaudzināšana (Education Self-education). Rīga: RaKa.

Vilbers, K. (2013). Aci pret aci. Rīga: Jumava.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-21

How to Cite

Kušnere, I., & Dombrovskis, A. (2019). TEACHER’S SELF-DEVELOPMENT: TEACHER’S SELF-DISCOVERIES REGARDING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PEDAGOGICAL PERSONALITY DEVELOPMENT DURING PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 5, 210-221. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.4002