WHAT ECONOMIC THEORY SHOULD BE TAUGHT IF THE GOAL IS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT?

Dmitry Egorov, Valery Romanov, Natalia Yarmolich, Angela Egorova

Abstract


The article is devoted to the topic of possible transformations in the paradigm of socio-economic development of modern world civilization, in the context of climate change. The purpose of the study: to identify what it would be desirable to change in textbooks on economics so that those who study, becoming managers and politicians, do not destroy the Earth’s biosphere by their actions. What in the economic mainstream underlies those pathological features of the world economy that lead all of humanity to the climatic apocalypse? At the level of theory, this is due to the extreme subjectivity of modern economic theory, which has taken the form of abandoning the category of “value”. The discussion of value is potentially of great practical importance: it is, in essence, a discussion of the legitimacy of the entire modern world financial and economic order. as the whole experience of world civilization shows, new ideas replace old ones when a new generation grows, for which these ideas are an organic part of their view of the world. Therefore, a change in the financial and economic paradigm should begin with changes in the textbooks of economics.

 


Keywords


changing of the climate; ecology, economics; sustainable education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulgamidov, N., & Gubanov, S. (2002). Dvojnye standarty odnopoljusnoj globalizacii. ekonomist, 12, 20–38.

Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philosophy Magazine, 41, 237–276.

Bomer-Kristiansen, S. (2000). Kto i kakim obrazom opredeljaet politiku, kasajushhujusja izmenenij klimata? Izvestija Russkogo geograficheskogo obshhestva, 132(3), 6–22.

Buzgalin, A., & Kolganov, A. (2009). Mirovoj jekonomicheskij krizis i scenarii postkrizisnogo razvitija: marksistskij analiz. Voprosy jekonomiki, 1, 119-132. DOI: http://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-1-119-132

Demirchan, K.S., Kondrat'ev, K.J., & Demirchan K.K. (2010). Global'noe poteplenie i «politika» ego predotvrashhenija. Biosfera, 2(4), 488-502.

Egorov, D.G. (2013). O teoreticheskoj al'ternative jekonomicheskomu mejnstrimu. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 7, 70-78. Retrieved from http://de-888.ucoz.ru/13-2.htm

Egorov, D.G. (2016). Neoklassika vs klassika: est' li v jekonomicheskoj teorii tretij put'? Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 6, 35-41. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2016-60-6-35-41

Egorov, D.G. (2017). Mikroteorija i stoimost'. Obshhestvo i jekonomika, 11, 81-90. Retrieved from http://de-888.ucoz.ru/17-2-.doc

Egorov, D., Dyatlov, Yu., Bogdanov, М., Shushpanov, E., & Egorova, A. (2018). Stoimost': jempirija i teorija. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. May 25th -26th, 6, 165-175. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3080

Francis, The Holy Father (2015). Laudato si'. Оn care for our common home. Vatican Press.

Gluhovcev, V.O., & Salahova, A.I. (2016). Ontologicheskie osnovanija mirovozzrencheskogo krizisa sovremennosti. Vek globalizacii, 1, 44-57. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ontologicheskie-osnovaniya-miro-vozzrencheskogo-krizisa-sovremennosti

Gor, A. (2007). Neudobnaja pravda. Global'noe poteplenie. Kak ostanovit' planetarnuju katastrofu. Sankt-Peterburg: Amfora.

Gorshkov, V.G. (1995). Fizicheskie i biologicheskie osnovy ustojchivosti zhizni. Moskva: VINITI.

Ioseliani A.D. (2019). Global'naja jekologija i jekologicheskaja bezopasnost': filosofskoe osmyslenie. Vek globalizacii, 1, 68-74. DOI: 10.30884/vglob/2019.01.06

Kejns, Dzh.M. (2007). Obshhaja teorija zanjatosti, procenta i deneg. Izbrannoe. Moskva: EKSMO.

Kiotskij protokol k Ramochnoj konvencii OON ob izmenenii klimata (1998). OON. Retrieved from http:// http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kprus.pdf

Kondrat'ev, K.J. (2000). Global'nye izmenenija na rubezhe tysjacheletij. Vestnik Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 9, 788–796.

Kuznecov, O.L., Kuznecov P.G., & Bol'shakov B.E. (2000). Sistema priroda–obshhestvo–chelovek: ustojchivoe razvitie. Moskva–Dubna: Noosfera.

Luk'janenko, V.I. (2009). Homo Consúmens – chelovek potrebljajushhij. Vek globalizacii, 2, 149-159. Retrieved from https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/126926/

Nordhaus, W. (2017). Integrated assessment models of climate change. NBER Reporter, 3, 16—20.

Pavlenko, V.B. (2017). Parizhskoe soglashenie kak ugroza nacional'noj bezopasnosti Rossii. Astrahanskij vestnik jekologicheskogo obrazovanija, 4, 25–40.

Popper, K. (1966). The open society and its enemies. Vol. 2: The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Samuelson, P.A. (1990). Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Sorokhtin, O.G., Chilingar, G.V., Khilyuk, L.F., & Gorfunkel M.V. (2007). Evolution of the Earth's Global Climate. Energy sources, Part A, 29(1), 1–19.

Sorokhtin, O.G. (2011). Chto zhe nam grozit: poteplenie ili poholodanie klimata? Izobretatel'stvo, 1, 9–25.

Soros, J. (1999). Krizis mirovogo kapitalizma. Otkrytoe obshhestvo v opasnosti. Moskva: INFRA-M.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.4877

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.