CREATION OF FAVORABLE EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS OF UKRAINE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol1.4897Keywords:
educational environment, favorable educational environment, higher education institution, learning environment, pedagogical environment, systemAbstract
The current conditions of socio-economic development of Ukraine make changes in the conditions of functioning of higher education. The aim of the article is to investigate the state and identify the problems of creating a favorable educational environment in institutions of higher education. The main methods used are theoretical, empirical, diagnostic, graphic. The article thoroughly researches and substantiates theoretical and methodological foundations and develops the structure of creation of favorable educational environment for professional training of future teachers of vocational training. We have identified the following generally accepted indicators of a favorable educational environment: a favorable psychological climate; content of education, technology of training; spatial environment; development opportunities. 180 teachers from Glukhiv National Pedagogical University named after Alexander Dovzhenko, Khmelnitsky National University, and State Higher Educational Institution “University of Management of Education” participated in the study. Expert assessment of indicators of a favorable educational environment was carried out by teachers through questionnaires. To diagnose the level of favorable psychological climate in the team, we used the methodology of V.V. Shampalovsky and E.G. Shelest "Diagnosis of psychological climate in a small production group". And indicators for diagnosing indicators - content of education, technology of training, spatial environment, development opportunities were investigated by created by us author's questionnaires. The indicators were evaluated on a 5-point scale.
Downloads
References
Fetinskin NP, Kozlov VV, & Manuylov GM (2002). Sotsialno-psihologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti malyih grupp . Moskva: Izd-vo Instituta psihoterapii.
Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I.T. (2007). The Validity of Assessment Centres for the Prediction of Supervisory Performance Ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 405–411. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00399.x/epdf.
Katashov, A.I. (2001). Pedagogicheskie osnovyi razvitiya innovatsionnoy obrazovatelnoy sredyi sovremennogo litseya: avtoref. dis. na soisk. nauch. stepeni kand. ped. Nauk.». Lugansk.
Kovalchuk, V.I. (2011). Sozdanie blagopriyatnoy uchebnoy sredyi: Treningi. Kiev: Shkolnyiy mir.
Kovalchuk, V.I. (2006). Strategiya upravleniya professionalno-tehnicheskim uchebnyim zavedeniem. Pedagogika i psihologiya professionalnogo obrazovaniya, 6, 199-204.
Melikova, C. O. (2011). Interaktivnoe obuchenie – innovatsionnaya forma uchebnogo protsessa. Vestnik Cherkasskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogicheskie nauki, #206, 89–93.
Kuo, M., Browning, M. H., & Penner, M. L. (2018). Do Lessons in Nature Boost Subsequent Classroom Engagement? Refueling Students in Flight. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 10.
Orlova, L. (2015). Sozdanie blagopriyatnoy obrazovatelnoy sredyi v vuze. Istoki pedagogicheskogo masterstva, 16, 231-237.
Radul, V. (2014). Predstavleniya o sotsialnoy srede vuza. Nauchnyie zapiski, 131, 18–22.
Tsyuman, T.P. & Boychuk, N.I. (2018). Kodeks bezopasnoy obrazovatelnoy sredyi: metod. posob. Kiev.
Vlasenko, O.N. (2015). Osobennosti razvitiya obrazovatelnoy sredyi pedagogicheskogo uchebnogo zavedeniya. Problemyi: sbornik nauchnyih trudov, 84, 82-85.
Vodolazskaya, T.V. (2018). Obrazovatelnaya sreda kak «tretiy uchitel». Retrieved from http://isp.poippo.pl.ua/article/view/135715/136753 .
Yaroshinskaya, O.O. (2015). Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovyi proektirovaniya obrazovatelnoy sredyi professionalnoy podgotovki buduschih uchiteley nachalnoy shkolyi: dis. na soisk. nauch. stepeni dokt. ped. nauk: spets.
