COMPARISON OF CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING IN THE PRIMARY LEVEL IN SPAIN AND SLOVAKIA

Authors

  • Barbora Pavelova University of Prešov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4929

Keywords:

benefits, CLIL, language, motivation, student, teacher

Abstract

As many authors agree, positive associations of Content Language Academic Learning have attracted numerous researchers, administrators, teacher educators and teachers, particularly those in the field of English as a foreign language. One of the main goals of the presented article is to offer a comparative analysis of CLIL approach at primary level in Spain and in Slovakia. The need for elaborating this issue is related to the diversity of language and the fact that CLIL has become prolific phenomenon in recent years, especially in pedagogical communication. The paper responds to different claims of the proponents of CLIL emphasizing its numerous benefits. Apart from that, the following paper provides a critical empirical examination of the positive CLIL outcomes in order to identify better its strengths in EFL. Due to distance, a sample of five Spanish teachers and five Slovak teachers at the primary level has been chosen randomly to respond to the online interview elaborating the use of CLIL in the classroom. In order to gain the results of the qualitative nature, the online interview included open-ended questions. Benefits of CLIL could be reflected in the enhanced motivation inside and outside the classroom, the need of students and teachers for critical thinking, requirement for a better concentration and in many other areas. The article presents current findings and brings the possibilities for implementing CLIL into more classrooms and enhancing pedagogical communication in foreign language classrooms.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admiraal, W., Westhoff, G. & de Bot, K. (2006). Evaluation of bilingual secondary education in The Netherlands: Students’ language proficiency. English Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(1), 75-93.

Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course: CLIL module. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bežilová, V. (2019). The Effect of Storytelling on Longer Vocabulary Retention. Contemporary research in education and English language teaching, 1(1), 57-62.

Bruton, A. (2011b). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523–532.

Cenoz, J., Genesee, F. & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243-262.

Cimermanová, I. (2017). CLIL – a Dialogue between the Language and Subject Teachers. Scientia et eruditio [elektronický zdroj], 1(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31262/2585­‑8556/2017/1/1/1­‑14

Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL – A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In Van Dusen-Scholl & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (97-111). New York: Springer.

Coyle, D, Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL. Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: CUP.

Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: an investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 244-266.

Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D. & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: the effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209-224.

Fernández, D. M., Ortega-Martín, J. L. & Hughes, S. P. (2019). CLIL and Language Education in Spain. In Tsuchiya, K. & Peréz-Murillo, M. D. (Eds.), Content And Language Integrated Learning In Spanish And Japanese Contexts (11-36). Springer.

Huguet, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Vila, I. (2008). Bilingual education in Spain: Present realities and future challenges. In J. Cummins & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (225-235). New York: Springer Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_127

Lasagabaster, D. & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2010). Ways forward in CLIL: Provision issues and future planning. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (278–295). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Lasagabaster, D. (2011). English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5(1), 3-18.

McDougald, J. S. (2018). CLIL across the Curriculum: Benefits that go beyond the classroom. LACIL 11(1), 9-18.

Mehisto, P. (2008). CLIL counterweights: Recognising and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal 1(1), 93-119.

Muñoz, C. & Navés, T. (2007). CLIL in Spain. In D. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.) Windows on CLIL. Content and Language Integrated Learning in the European Spotlight (160-165). The Netherlands: European Centre for Modern Languages.

Oxbrow, G. L. (2018). Students’ Perspectives on CLIL Program: A Quantitative Analysis. Porta Linguarum 29, 137-158.

Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2014). Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266-295.

Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). CLIL and Educational Level: A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL Outcomes. Porta Linguarum, 1, 51-70.

Pérez-Vidal, C., & Juan-Garau, M. (2010). To CLIL or not to CLIL: From bilingualism to multilingualism in Catalan/Spanish communities. In D. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz de Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher Training (115-138). Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Pokrivčáková, S. (2015). CLIL in Slovakia: projects, research, and teacher training. In Pokrivčáková, S. et al. (Ed.), CLIL in Foreign Language Education: e-textbook for foreign language teachers (17-29). Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University.

Rallo Fabra, L. & Jacob, K. (2015). Does CLIL Enhance Oral Skills? Fluency and Pronunciation Errors by Spanish-Catalan Learners of English. In M. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based Language Learning in Multilingual Educational Environments, Educational Linguistics 23 (163-178). Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.

Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2008). CLIL and Foreign Language Learning: A Longitudinal Study in the Basque Country. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(1), 60-73.

Serra, C. (2007). Assessing CLIL at Primary School: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 10(5), 82-602.

Straková, Z. & Sepešiová, M. (2015). CLIL in Reading Programmes. In Hanesová, D. (Ed.), Learning together to be a better CLIL teacher (99-107). Banská Bystrica: UMB.

Trníková, J. (2015). Primary CLIL. In Pokrivčáková, S. et al. (Ed.), CLIL in Foreign Language Education: e-textbook for foreign language teachers (45-59). Nitra: Constantine the Philosopher University.

Downloads

Published

2020-05-20

How to Cite

Pavelova, B. (2020). COMPARISON OF CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING IN THE PRIMARY LEVEL IN SPAIN AND SLOVAKIA. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 437-446. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4929