Problems of Interpreting Literary Work at School

Authors

  • Dagmāra Ausekle University of Latvia (LV)
  • Ilze Kangro University of Latvia (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.527

Abstract

Integration in the global world that has rapidly been happening during the independence years in Latvia has brought about many benefits in the field of education but has also created numerous problems. It has aggravated the postmodern situation which in the context of literature teaching/learning has manifested itself as decrease of learners’ reading interests and skills. In didactics of the Latvian literature, the approach to interpretation of a literary work designed in the 19th and 20th has enriched with various theoretical and methodological sources from the West. It raised the necessity to develop awareness of these theories in the cultural and historical context and draw the conclusions in connection with the actual situation at schools. To solve these problems, curriculum development requires change of focus as well as varied methodological approaches should be applied to increase learners’ motivation to read literature and raise awareness of themselves and the environment with the help of works of art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ausekle, Dagmāra & Kangro Ilze. (2002). Humanitāro priekšmetu dehumanizācijas problēma mūsdienu izglītībā. Izglītības zinātnes un pedagoģija mūsdienu pasaulē: LU Zinātniskie raksti, Nr. 655. R.: Latvijas Universitāte.

Auseklis. (1955). Izlase. R.: LVI.

Āboma, Inita. (1997). K.G.Junga Ēnas arhetips A.Upīša traģēdijā „Spartaks”. Rakstu krājums Valoda un literatūra saskarsmes lokā. R.: Latvijas Universitāte.

Darnstädt, Thomas. (2001). Mangelhaft. Setzen. Spiegel, Nr. 50.

Fromms, Ērihs. (2003). Mīlestības māksla. R.: Apgāds „Jumava”.

Karpova, Ārija. (1998). Personība. Teorijas un to radītāji. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.

Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca.(2000). R: Zvaigzne ABC.

Rau, Helmut.(2004). Literatur in der Schule. http://www.bildung staerktmenschen.de/schule_2004/literatur_broschuere/BP_Broschuere_Literatur_050629.p [skatīts [06.03. 2013].

Rožkalne, Anita. (1988). Literatūras izpētes aspekti aizrobežu literatūrzinātnē. Literatūras un mākslas vērtēšanas principi. Atb. red. V.Hausmanis. Rīga, Zinātne.

Schwanitz, Dietrich. 2001. An die Lehrer deutscher Nation. Focus. Nr. 50.

Trumpe, Inese. (1991). Teorijas pelēkās krāsas. Karogs, Nr.3-4, 11-12.

Valoda un literatūra saskarsmes lokā. (1997). Rakstu krājums. Atb. red. A. Raževa. TEMPUS II JEP – 7188 Updating of In-Service Teaching Training in Universities of Latvia R.: LU.

Aверинцев, Сергей. (1972). Аналистическая психология К. Г. Юнга и закономерности творческой фантазии. O современной буржуазной эстетике. (вып.3). M: Искусство.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-30

How to Cite

Ausekle, D., & Kangro, I. (2015). Problems of Interpreting Literary Work at School. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 185-193. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.527