The Actual Tasks of Development of Dialogism of Students

Authors

  • Jeļena Jermolajeva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.535

Keywords:

antinomian thinking, dialogical attitude, dialogical interaction, dialogism of students, main skills of dialogue

Abstract

The paper deals with one of the fast developing modern educational approaches – the pedagogy of dialogue. The structure of main dialogical skills elaborated by the author makes it possible to concretize the tasks of dialogical education. The main dialogical skills (which are at the same time the main preconditions of dialogical interaction) are: a) the skill of dialogical attitude; b) the skill of antinomian thinking, c) open-mindedness and creativity. An effective dialogue teaching requires a clear comprehension of the dialogismorientated/non-dialogism-orientated views, statements and reactions of students. In this paper the materials of cross-cultural research are used, which was carried out in Riga and Moscow schools in 2010-2011. The gained results allowed assessing the results of the dialogical development of students from Form 9 to Form 12 (Form 11), to observe the problem points and to establish more precisely the pedagogical tasks and directions for dialogical upbringing

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Būbers, M. (2010) Es un Tu. Rīga, Latvija: Zvaigzne ABC.

Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York: Teachers College Press, 1993.

Ermolaeva, E. (2011) Toward Sustainable Development of Society Through the Development of Dialogical Abilities. Lifelong Learning and Continuous Education for Sustainable Development, Vol. 9. Saint-Petersburg, Russia: Leningrad state university, c. 121–124.

Jermolajeva, J. (2011). Jauniešu dialoģiskums/nedialoģiskums viņu uzvedībā konfliktsituācijās un attieksmē pret ekstrēmistisko darbību. A. Špona, V. Sobkins (Zin. red.) Mūsdienu skolēni Rīgā un Maskavā: Salīdzinošais starptautiskais pētījums. Rīga: RaKa, 177. 199. lpp.

Matusov E. (2009) Journey Into Dialogic Pedagogy. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc.

Sidorkin, A.M. (1999). Beyond Discourse: Education, the Self, and Dialogue. New York: State Univ of New York.

Špona, A., Sobkins, V. (Zin. red.) (2011). Mūsdienu skolēni Rīgā un Maskavā: Salīdzinošais starptautiskais pētījums. Rīga: RaKa.

Wegerif R. (2006) Dialogic Education: what is it and why do we need it? Education Review, Vol. 19 No 2, 58-67.

Бахтин, М.М. (1979). Проблемы поэтики Достоевского. Москва: Изд-во «Советская Россия».

Бахтин, М.М. (1997) Проблема речевых жанров. М.М. Бахтин. Собрание сочинений в 7 томах, т. 5. Москва: Изд-во "Русские словари", с. 159–206.

Ермолаева, Е. (2011). Проблема развития способностей к диалогу с метафорическим собеседником. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. Šiauliai: SMC “Scientia Educologica”, V. 33, p. 133-142.

Ермолаева, Е.Б. (2012). Основные характеристики диалогического взаимодействия (к определению актуальных задач педагогики диалога). Образование и наука. Известия отделения Российской академии образования № 7 (96). Сентябрь 2012. Екатеринбург: Уральское отд. Рос. акад. образования, с. 18 – 34.

Downloads

Published

2015-05-30

How to Cite

Jermolajeva, J. (2015). The Actual Tasks of Development of Dialogism of Students. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 258-267. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol1.535