1. Home

LOMBARDY AND VENETO BIOCULTURAL FINGERPRINT: A DRIVING FORCE FOR TOURISM AND RESIDENTIAL ATTRACTION

Luca Iseppi, Ting Fa Margherita Chang, Maurizio Droli

Abstract


The approach to the territory’s biocultural fingerprint can be very important when it comes to studying uniformities and differences among different regions. By examining the code of the attributes and the features, it is therefore possible to determine the landscapecultural uniformities which can create a common project for tourism and residential attraction. The differences underline emergencies of a cultural, natural, agricultural, and wine-gastronomic nature which are capable not only of rendering a territory identifiable but also of presenting it to integrated tourist packages and residential perspectives. The objective of this research is to verify the competitive ability which can enhance the potentialities of ‘territorial capital’. This comparative study amongst the fingerprints of the Lombardy and Veneto regions uses a model which can appraise the tourism and residential attraction determining the attributes’ code characterizing homogeneous sets of municipalities.

Keywords


regional model appraisal; biocultural fingerprint; competitiveness, landscapecultural characteristics; territorial capital potentialities; tourism attractiveness; innovation management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chang, T.F.M.; & Iseppi, L.; & Piccinini, L.C. (2007). Paesaggi: una fingerprint bioculturale. Atti del Convegno Internazionale Vestire il Paesaggio, 44-46, Pistoia.

Chang, T.F.M.; & Iseppi, L.; & Piccinini, L.C. (2010). Attrattività turistica e fingerprint bioculturale del territorio. Un confronto tra Veneto e Friuli Venezia Giulia. Economia e Diritto Agroalimentare, 2, 245-268.

Chang, T. F. M.; & Iseppi, L. (2011). Specialization versus Diversification in EU Economies: a Challenge for Agro-food? Transition Studies Review, 18, 1, 16-37.

Chang, T. F. M.; & Iseppi, L. (2012). EU Agro-Food Chain and Vertical Integration Potentiality: a Strategy for Diversification? Transition Studies Review, 19, 1, 107-130.

Gambi, L. (2001). Paesaggio. Enciclopedia Italiana Treccani Appendice, 395-396.

Iseppi, L. (2009). L'uso del suolo aziendale agricolo nei comuni italiani. Metodo per l'analisi del mosaico paesistico-ambientale e applicazione all'Italia. Udine: Forum Editrice.

Kunzmann, K. R. (2006). Spatial Development and Territorial Cohesion in Europe. In Altrock, U.; & Güntner, S.; & Huning, S.; & Peters, D. Spatial Planning and Urban Development in the New EU Members States. England: Ed. Ashgate.

Sereni, E. (1974). Storia del paeasaggio agrario italiano. Bari: Laterza.

Taverna, M; & Piccinini, L. C. (2006). Dallo spazio edonico locale al turismo globale. Agribusiness paesaggio & ambiente, 3, 9, 218 – 228.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2013vol2.593

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Rēzeknes Tehnoloģiju akadēmija, 2016 © Atbrīvošanas aleja 115, Rēzekne, Latvija. Tālrunis: 28325368;
Jautājumus un ierosinājumus sūtiet uz helpdesk@rta.lv