USER ANALYSIS FOR E-INCLUSION IN A BLENDED LEARNING COURSE DELIVERY CONTEXT

Authors

  • Ieva Vitolina Riga Technical University Distance Education Study Centre (LV)
  • Atis Kapenieks Riga Technical University Distance Education Study Centre (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol2.656

Keywords:

E-inclusion, e-learning, digital skills, digital skills gap, usage gap

Abstract

The authors’ purpose was to analyse users of the blended e-learning course “Improvement of ICT skills” in context of e-inclusion and determine indicators for e-inclusion facilitation. We applied a practical use probability model to perform the analysis that identified the following factors: the degree to which the instructor was willing and able to share knowledge; the degree to which the students were interested and had the capacity to learn; and the degree to which the sponsoring organization supported and promoted learning. The study was based on evaluating a group of five hundred vocational teachers who were the learners. Our results indicated that the quality of e-learning materials and environment, instructor's support, student willingness and ability to learn were attributes that could impact learning carry-over and promoted e-inclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrantes, J., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(9), 960-964.

Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Retrieved from ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC67075_TN.pdf

Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Retrieved from http://openlibrary.org/books/OL7141097M/Interest_and_effort_in_education

European Commission. (2011). Digital agenda scoreboard 2011. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda/scoreboard/library/index_en.htm

European Commission. (2014). Digital Agenda Scoreboard key indicators. Retrieved from http://digital-agenda-data.eu/datasets/digital_agenda_scoreboard_key_indicators/indicators

A Digital Agenda for Europe. 2010. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society

Deursen, A. J. A. M. v., & Dijk, J. A. G. M. v. (2009). Improving digital skills for the use of online public information and services. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 333-340.

Deursen, A. J. A. M. v., & Dijk, J. A. G. M. v. (2010). Internet skills and digital divide. New media & society, 13(6), 893-911

Hargittai, E. (2000). Second-level digital divide: differences in people’s online. Retrieved from Skillschnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/links/pdf/introduction/0.26c.pdf

Lerchner, A., Camera, G. L., & Richmond B. (2007). Knowing without doing. Nature Neuroscience, 10(1). 15-17. Retrieved from http://ebookbrowse.com/2007-lerchner-etal-knowing-without-doing-pdf-d78454237

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of American Society of Training Directors, 13(3), 21-26.

McLean, R. (2006). A tale of two e-citizens: a consideration of engagement in the e-society in two contexts. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, 2013-2016.

Nissen, M., E. (2006). Harnessing knowledge dynamics: Principled organizational knowing & learning. London: IRM Press.

OECD. (2010). Are the new millennium learners making the grade? Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/56/45000441.pdf

Oye, N., D., Salleh, M., M., & Iahad, N. A. (2011). E-Learning barriers and solutions to knowledge management and transfer. Information Management & Business Review, 3(6), 366-372.

Pfeffer, J., & Sutton R., I. (1999). Knowing "what" to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. California Management Review, 42(1), 83.-108.

Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241-250.

Roskelly, H. (2005). Still bridges to build: English education's pragmatics agenda. English Education, 37(4), 288-295.

Sulčič, V., & Lesjak, D. (2009). E-learning and study effectiveness. Journal Of Computer Information Systems, 49(3), 40-47.

Subramaniam, P. R. (2009). Motivational effects of interest on student engagement and learning in physical education: A review. International Journal of Physical Education, 46(2), 11-19.

Vedins, I. (2011). Mācīšanas māksla. Rīga: Avots.

WEKA Machine Learning Group at the University of Waikato. 2014. Downloading and installing Weka, Retrieved from http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/downloading.html

Wu, X. a.o. (2008). Top 10 algorithms in data mining, Knowl Inf Syst,14:1–37, Retrieved from http://www.cs.umd.edu/~samir/498/10Algorithms-08.pdf

Yun-Tsan, L., Shui-Chuan, C., & Hsiang-Ta, C. (2011). The effect of Organizational commitment on employee reactions to educational training: an evaluation using the Kirkpatrick four-level model. International Journal Of Management, 28(3), 926-938.

Zhao, S., & Elesh, D. (2006). The second digital divide: unequal access to social capital in the online world. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p96480_index.html

Downloads

Published

2015-07-24

How to Cite

Vitolina, I., & Kapenieks, A. (2015). USER ANALYSIS FOR E-INCLUSION IN A BLENDED LEARNING COURSE DELIVERY CONTEXT. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 367-378. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol2.656