ASSESSMENT OF THE DEGREE OF THE PROFUNDITY OF SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS

Authors

  • Jan Michalík Palacky University Olomouc (CZ)
  • Vít Voženílek Palacky University Olomouc (CZ)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol3.708

Keywords:

diagnostics of special educational needs, disablement, educational psychological centres, equal access, non-discrimination, special educational needs

Abstract

The article provides information on extensive research of the profundity (degree) measurement of special educational needs (SEN) of children, pupils and students with disablement in the Czech Republic. The research was based on more than 80 thousands records of contacts with children with disablement. The authors answer the following questions: Are there any differences in the assessment of the SEN for each type of disablements? Are there any differences in the same assessment for each type of educational consultancy facilities? Which methods of the assessment of the SEN’s extent are available (and which are required)? What are the consequences of incorrect diagnostics of SEN? The research has shown an inadequate legislative expression of procedural assessment of the impact of disablement for the education purposes. It also confirmed that very few suitable standardized measuring tools are available in the area of special pedagogical diagnostics (as opposed to psychological diagnostics).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DVORSKÝ, J., SNÁŠEL, V. & VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2009). Map Similarity Testing Using Matrix Decomposition. 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS 2009), 290-294.

DVORSKÝ, J., SNÁŠEL, V. & VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2010). On maps comparison methods. 2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, CISIM 2010, art. no. 5643513, 557-562.

EDDY, L. 2013. Caring for children with special healthcare needs and their families. USA: Wiley – Blackwell.

FREDERICKSON, N. & CLINE, T. (2003). Special education needs, Inclusion and diversity. Open University Press.

MEYEN, E. & SKRTIC, T. (1995). Special education. Student Disability. Love Publishing Company.

MICHALÍK, J. (2011). Citizens with disability – Crisis of the Welfare State in Europe? Social Welfare: interdisciplinary Approach, 1, No. LT-76285, 8-15.

MICHALÍK, J. et al. (2011). Zdravotně postižení a pomáhající profese. Praha, Portál.

OECD. 2000. Knowledge and Skills for Life. First Results from PISA 2000. Paris.

REYNOLDS, R. & FLETCHER, E. (2002). Concise encyclopedia of special education. John Wiley.

TUČEK, P., PÁSZTO, V. & VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2009). Regular use of entropy for studying dissimilar geographical phenomena. Geografie, 114(2), 117-129.

VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2002). Geoinformatic literacy: Indispensability or nonsense? [Geoinformatická gramotnost: nezbytnost nebo nesmysl?] Geografie, 107(4), 371-382.

VOŽENÍLEK, V. (2009). Artificial intelligence and GIS: mutual meeting and passing. 2009 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCOS 2009), 279-284.

VOŽENÍLEK, V. & MICHALÍK, J. et al. (2013). Atlas of Special Education Centres in the Czech Republic [Atlas speciálně pedagogických center v České republice]. Olomouc, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.

WHO. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

Downloads

Published

2015-07-24

How to Cite

Michalík, J., & Voženílek, V. (2015). ASSESSMENT OF THE DEGREE OF THE PROFUNDITY OF SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 3, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2014vol3.708