Social life cycle assessment of biomethane production and distribution in Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.628Keywords:
biomethane, multi-criteria analysis, social impacts, social life cycle assessmentAbstract
A social life cycle assessment is proposed for the evaluation of the social potential impact in regard to the production and use of biomethane derived from biomass (algae and manure) in Latvia. The Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) is used to evaluate the social performances, which have been selected based on literature, statistics and legislation data. Seven alternatives are evaluated by experts and the best alternative is figured out.Downloads
References
B. Morero, E. Groppelli, E. A. Campanella, “Life cycle assessment of biomethane use in Argentina”, Bioresource Technol, vol. 182, pp. 208-216, Jan 2015.
C. Benoit, B. Mazijn, Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. United Nations Environment Programme, 2009
C. Benoit Norris, M. Traverso, S. Valdivia, G. Vickery-Niederman, et al. The Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). Pre-publication version. United Nations Environment Programme, SETAC, 2013.
C. Macombe, P. Leskinen, P. Feschet, R. Antikainen, “Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs”, J Clean Prod, vol. 52, pp. 205-216, Mar 2013.
I. Dzene, F. Romagnoli, G. Seile, D. Blumberga, “Comparison of different biogas use pathways for Latvia: biogas use in CHP vs. biogas upgrading”, in press.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, “NB01, Population by labour status, sex and quarter”, [Online]. Available: http://www.csb.gov.lv/ [Accessed: Feb. 26, 2015].
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, “IBG01.Long-term migration”, [Online]. Available: http://www.csb.gov.lv/ [Accessed: Feb. 26, 2015].
J. Domac, K. Richards, S. Risovic, “Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects”, Biomass Bioenerg, vol. 28, pp.97-106, Oct 2004.
R. Berger-Schmitt, Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: concept and measurement, EuReporting working paper No.14, Mannheim: EuReporting, 2000.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, “Agriculture in Latvia. Collection of statistical data”, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.csb.gov.lv/sites/default/files/nr_30_latvijas_lauksaimnieciba_2013_13_00_lv_en.pdf [Accessed: Feb. 27, 2015].
Pilsonības un migrācijas lietu pārvalde, „Latvijas iedīvotāju skaits pašvaldībās”, [Online]. Available: http://www.pmlp.gov.lv/lv/assets/documents/statistika/IRD_01_07_2012/ISPV_Pasvaldibas_iedzivotaju_skaits.pdf [Accessed:Feb. 17, 2015] [in Latvian].
M. E. Montingelli, S. Tedesco, A. G. Olabi, “Biogas production from algal biomass: A review”, Renew Sust Energ Rev, vol. 43, pp. 961-972, Dec. 2014.
A. Singh, S. I. Olsen, “A critical review of biochemical conversion, sustainability and life cycle assessment of algal biofuels”, Appl Energ, vol. 88, pp. 3548-3555, Jan 2011.
D. Lauka, “Low carbon energy waste. Physical properties”, M.S. thesis, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia, 2014.
J. Martínez-Blanco, A. Lehmann, P. Muñoz, A. Antón, M.Traverso, J. Rieradevall, and M. Finkbeiner. Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod, vol. 69, pp. 34-48, 2014.
