THE EFFICIENCY OF USING ALTERNATIVE FERTILIZERS IN POTATO PLANTATIONS

Authors

  • Aleksandrs Adamovičs Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Institute of Soil and Plant Sciences (LV)
  • Liena Poiša Rezekne Academy of Technologies (LV)
  • Lydiia Antypova Mykolayiv National Agrarian University Mykolayiv (UA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2023vol1.7247

Keywords:

digestate, fertilizer mix, potatoes, wood ash

Abstract

Field trials with the two potato variety were carried out in sod stagnogley soil. Soil agrochemical parameters: pHKCl 6.7 organic matter (OV) content in soil 2.3%, phosphorus (P2O5) content - 149 mg kg-1 and potassium (K2O) content - 200 mg kg-1 in soil. Potato plantations were created using different variants of fertilizer mix with pig (from SIA “Latvi Dan Agro”) and cattle (from SIA “Ziedi JP”) manure digestate and wood ash (from SIA“Gren Jelgava”) in different ratio (digestate :wood ash ratio used: 4:1and 3:1). The rates of innovative mixed fertilizer for pig and cattle manure digestates for potatoes were 15 and 30 t ha-1. Both norms for digestate manure from pure pigs and cattle were used as control options. The potato production norm was 3.0 t ha-1. The placement of the variants in the trial was randomized, in triplicate. In the study, the two types of fertilizer had different effects on potato tuber yield. Using mixtures of pig manure digestate and wood ash in different ratios, the average yield was 34.2 t ha-1, but using mixtures of cattle manure digestate and wood ash, the average yield was 27.8 t ha-1. In the studied variants, its content in potato dry matter varied in the range of 9.15-11.42%. The amount of dry matter affects the culinary properties of the tubers. The application of fertilizer mixtures increased the dry matter content by an average of 1.7–2.7%. Fertilizer variants with higher tuber yield or higher starch content provided the highest starch yield.  In general, the use of mixtures of wood ash and biogas digestate to fertilize crops and improve soil fertility can be an efficient way to process both products and can be an environmentally friendly alternative to fertilizers. The objective of the research was to study the influence of digestate and wood ash mixtures fertilizer rates on potato productivity and quality.

 

Supporting Agencies
The research was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Support Service of the Republic of Latvia for the project "Development of a new technology for the production of plant fertilizers from the residues of biogas plant digestion (digestate) and woodchip cogeneration (woodchip ash)". Contract No.19-00-A01612-000008.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Koszel and E Lorencowicz. “Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers”. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7, pp. 119 – 124, 2015.

K. Risberg, H. Cederlund, M. Pell, V. Arthurson and A. Schnürer. “Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure - chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity”. Waste Management, 61, pp. 529–538, 2017.

A. Demeyer, J.C.V. Nkana and M.G.Verloo. “Characteristics of wood ash and influence on soil properties and nutrient uptake: an overview”. Bioresour Technol, 77, pp. 287–295, 2001.

S.J. Patterson, S.N. Acharya, J.E. Thomas, A.B. Beritschi and R.L. Rothwell. “Integrated soil and crop management: Barley biomass and grain yield and canola seed yield response to land application of wood ash”. Agronomy Journal, 96 (4), pp. 971–977, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0971

I. Fuzesi, B. Heil and G. Kovacs. “Effects of wood ash on the chemical properties of soil and crop vitality”. Acta Silv. Lign. Hung., Vol. 11, Nr. 1, pp. 55–64, 2015.

W. E. Mitch and T.A. Ikizler. “Handbook of nutrition and the Kidney”. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 6th edition, 340p, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-13

How to Cite

[1]
A. Adamovičs, L. Poiša, and L. Antypova, “THE EFFICIENCY OF USING ALTERNATIVE FERTILIZERS IN POTATO PLANTATIONS”, ETR, vol. 1, pp. 17–21, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.17770/etr2023vol1.7247.