Līga Mirlina


Along with the decrease of administrative influences, the effective functioning of contemporary public administration needs the support and partnership of society. The necessity to consider the reaction of society obliges to inform and to create public understanding on decisions made by the public administration, as well as to ensure an opportunity for individuals to get involved in the decision making process. Thus, the role of communication in public administration performance increases. The regulation of the state needs increasingly greater public acceptance and approval both by responding to the public’s position and wishes and by creating common values and standards that are often achieved by the communication process. In order to understand the role of communications in public administration processes, the author has studied the development of the public administration communication during several state reform stages in Latvia. Using qualitative research methods – interviews, document analysis and comparative analysis and quantitative content analysis –, the trends and challenges in the development of Latvian public administration communication were identified. It is possible to stress two important changes – firstly, the goal of public communications is not just to increase the awareness of the public, but also to involve the public in the state’s development, and secondly, the transformation of communication changes the methods and the way of public administration communication.


communication; political participation; public administration

Full Text:



Blumenthal, A. (2009). Whay Social Media Matters for Government. Downloaded from

Drapeau, M. (2009). Government 2.0: How Social Media Could Transform Gov PR. Downloaded from

Dreimane, E. (2011). E-rīki sabiedrības informēšanai par Ministru kabinetā izskatāmajiem jautājumiem. Downloaded from

Jansen, P. (2010). Government communication and the struggle for recognition in the public sphere. In: Virga, D. (Ed.) Transparency, Democracy and Global Governance: a European perspective (pp.157-176). West University of Timisoara Publishing House

Jansone, D., Vilka, I. (2005.) Pārvaldes struktūru atsaucīgums. In: Rozenvalds, J. (Ed.) Cik demokrātiska ir Latvija. Demokrātijas audits (165-174 lpp.). Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte

Katlips, S.M., Senters, A.H., Brūms, G.M. (2002). Sabiedriskās attiecības. Rīga: Avots

Lange, A., Mitchell, S., Stewart-Weeks, M., Vila, J. (2008). The connected republic and the power of social networks. Downloaded from

Latvijas ilgtspējīgas attīstības stratēģija līdz 2030. gadam „Latvija 2030” (2010). Ķīlis, R. et al (Eds.) Downloaded from

Latvijas Valsts reformu koncepcija. (1995). Laikraksta Diena pielikums Saeimā un Ministru kabinetā. – 25.01.1995.

Loh, T., Chong, M. (2005). Public Relations As Deliberation: The Case of Government Public Relations in Singapore. Downloaded from meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/1/4/0/5/pages14055/p14055-1.php

Macmillan, P., Medd, A., Hughes, P. (2008). Change your world or the world will change you. Downloaded from EN.pdf

Mordecai, L. (2007). Government public relations: a reader. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications

Nader, R. (2014). Unstoppable. The Emerging Left-Right Alliance to Dismantle the Corporate State. New York: Nation Books

Русаков, А.Ю. (2006). Связи с общественностью в органах государственной власти. СПб.: Изд-во Михайлова В.А.

Valdības komunikācijas politikas pamatnostādnes 2001.-2006. gadam. (2001). Downloaded from

Valdības komunikācijas politikas pamatnostādnes 2008.–2013. gadam. (2008). Downloaded from

Valsts kanceleja. Valsts kancelejas mobilā aplikācija „Futbols” iekļūst „World Summit Award Mobile” finālā. (2014). Downloaded from show=comen

Valsts pārvaldes politikas attīstības pamatnostādnēm 2014.-2020.gadam. (2014.) Downloaded from

Русаков, А.Ю. (2006). Связи с общественностью в органах государственной власти. СПб.: Изд-во Михайлова В.А.



  • There are currently no refbacks.