CHARACTERISTICS OF SELF-DETERMINATION OF STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol3.2311Keywords:
personal autonomy, personal potential, psychological well-being, self-determination, subjectivityAbstract
The article describes the psychological characteristics of students with disabilities. Their individual psychological characteristics are identified and they indicate the existence of effective models of interactions with their social environment, adequate self-acceptance, enough active life philosophy in such students. The article determines that such personality formations as life goals, personal autonomy, desire for personal growth, self-confidence are the most important for the development of self-determination of students with disabilities.References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. N.Y.: W. H. Freeman & Co
Deci, E. & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Field, S. & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 159-169.
Gabanska, J. (1995). Autonomy of the individual in the developmental and axiological perspective. The Polish quarterly of developmental psychology, L (1-4), 1-11.
Getzel, E. & Thoma, C (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31(2), 77-84.
Getzel, E. (2014.). Fostering Self-Determination in Higher Education: Identifying Evidence-Based Practices. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(4), 381-386.
Ryan, R. & Connell, J. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Ryan, R. & Deci E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Ryan, R., Patrick, H., Deci, E. & Williams, G. (2008). Facilitating health behaviour change and its maintenance: Interventions based on self-determination theory. The European Health Psychologist, 10, 2-5.
Ryff, C. & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1-28.
Ryff, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.
Seligman, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. American psychologist, 55, 1.
Serdiuk, L. (2011). Psychological well-being of future specialists in the integrated educational environment and the factors of its formation. Social welfare: interdisciplinary approach, 1(1), 44-51.
Stodden, R. & Dowrick, P. (2001). Postsecondary education and employment of adults with disabilities. American Rehabilitation, 25(3), 19-23.
Test, D. W., Fowler, C. & Kohler, P. (2013). Evidence-based practices and predictors in secondary transition: What we know and what we still need to know. Charlotte. NC: National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238740857_Evidence-Based_Practices_and_Predictors_in_Secondary_Transition_What_We_Know_and_What_We_Still_Need_to_Know
Wehmeyer, M., Agran, M. & Hughes, C. (1998). Teaching self-determination to student with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Адлер, А. (1995). Практика и теория индивидуальной психологии. Москва: Фонд «За экономич. грамотность».
Березин Ф., Мирошников М. & Соколова Е. (1994). Методика многостороннего исследования личности (структура, основы интерпретации, некоторые области применения). Москва: Фолиум.
Леонтьев, Д. & Рассказова, Е. (2006). Тест жизнестойкости. Москва: Смысл.
Леонтьев, Д. (1992). Тест смысложизненных ориентаций. Москва: Смысл.
Мадди, С. (2005). Смыслообразование в процессе принятия решений. Психологический журнал, 26 (6), 87-101.
Осин, E. & Леонтьев, Д. (2008). Апробация русскоязычных версий двух шкал экспресс-оценки субъективного благополучия: материалы III Всероссийского социологического конгресса. Москва: Институт социологии РАН, Российское общество социологов.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
