VALUES HIGHLIGHTING PRODUCTIVE LEARNING IN THE PROCESS OF DEBATING

Maija Ročāne, Alīda Samuseviča

Abstract


The lack of students` motivation is quite often the reason why students have low academic abilities and achievements. However, this can be a consequence of a lack of productive learning-oriented values. The empirical findings of the survey reveal that engagement in the process of debating contributes to the ability of students to evaluate and recognize the values gained during the debates, as well as students' self-direction, which contributes to their progression and productivity in different life situations. Students` responses to the values gained in the process of debating reveal that students' ability to self-direction increases proportionally to the students` length of experience of debating, while focusing on achievements reduces. Thus the achievement of long-term goals has been highlighted in comparison with short-term goals. The aim of the publication is to find out students' opinion about the values acquired during the process of debating, revealing and characterizing the pedagogical potential of the implementation of the debate.

 


Keywords


debating; self-direction; cooperation; achievements; students

Full Text:

PDF

References


Algarabel, S., & Dasi, C. (2001). The definition of achievement and the construction of tests for its measurement: The review of the main trends. In: Psicologica. Nr. 22, 43-46. Universitat de Valencia. Pieejams: https://www.uv.es/revispsi/articulos1.01/dasi.pdf

Brighouse, H. (2009). Moral and Political Aims (pp.35-51). In: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Coleman, J. C. (2011). The nature of adolescence. Hong Kong: Psychology press.

Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G. Murphy, B., &Court, P. (1995). Prosocial behavior in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development. Vol. 66, No. 4, 1179-1197

Grow, G.,O. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult education quarterly. Volume 41, Number 4, 125-149.

Pētījums par priekšlaicīgas mācību pamešanas iemesliem un riskiem jauniešiem vecuma grupā no 13 līdz 18 gadiem (2014). Rīga: Izglītības un zinātnes ministrija. Pieejams: http://www.izm.gov.lv/images/statistika/petijumi/41.pdf

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (2013). Cooperation in the classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Kamerāde, D., Mārtinsone, K., & Pipere, A. (2016). Pētniecība: teorija un prakse. Rīga: RaKa.

Kroplijs A., & Raščevska M. (2004). Kvalitatīvās pētniecības metodes sociālajās zinātnēs. Rīga: RaKa.

Myers, D.,G. (2003). Psychology, Seventh Edition. Gordonsville: Worth Publishers.

Rutter, M., & Rutter, M. (1993). Developing Minds. Lomdon: Penguin books.

Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue française de sociologie. Volume 47 Number 4, 249-288.

Valsts Izglītības satura centrs. (2017). Izglītība mūsdienīgai lietpratībai: mācību satura un pieejas apraksts. Rīga. Pieejams:

https://domaundari.lv/cepure/Macibu%20satura%20un%20pieejas%20apraksts.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3428

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.