PRACTICAL ACTIVITIES ALLOW STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES TO DEVELOP AN UNDERSTANDING OF THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND THEMSELVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol3.1440Keywords:
students with disabilities, moderate/severe disabilities, special education, curriculum, Home Economics and Its Technologies, the educational processAbstract
The research problem was to find answer to the question: how did the role of practical tasks and activities in the education of students with moderate/severe disabilities is an important one. A review of current and past theories of cognitive development focusing on the role of experiential learning because for today’s students with disabilities there is a stronger emphasis on practical skills and motor skills development opportunities than on traditional learning approaches. Home Economics and Its Technologies is one of the subjects in today’s curriculum where time is allocated to activity-based learning and experiences. Occupational therapy has a positive effect on the child’s psyche, helps to manage and organise the child’s impulses, renews and promotes appropriate work habits, helps organise his/her activities and reduces the child’s focus on his/her own shortcomings or disabilities.
References
Antoloģija, (1994). Pedagoģiskā doma Latvijā no 1890. g. līdz 1940. g. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Bēkons, F. (1989). Jaunais organons. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Boud, D. et al, (1985). Reflection. Turning Experience into Learning. London: Kogan.
Broks, A. (2007). Science education as life experience for life. Proceedings of 6th IOSTE Symposium for Central and Eastern Europe „Science and Technology Education in Central and Eastern Europe: Past, Present and Future”, Siauliai University Publishing House, p. 26 – 30.
Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, Masschusetts, London, England: Harvard University Press, ix.
Dewey, J. (1974). Experience and Education. New York: Collier Books.
Ericson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and Society, W.W. Norton& Company, publiced 1964.
Florian, L. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Special Education. British Library, Cataloguing in Publication data.
Freimanis, I. (2007). Ieskats speciālās skolas darbā. Rīga: RaKa.
Friend, M. P. (2005). Special Education: Contemporary Perspectives for School Professionals. Pearson Education. Inc.
General Education Law (1999). Downloaded from www.ndg.lv/latvian/.../Visparejas%20izglitibas%20likums.docHattie and Timperley,2007
Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1992). The Manual of Learning Styles. Peter Honey Publications, 3Rev Ed edition.
IZM Statistics and Data Analysis Division. Downloaded from http://www.izm.gov.lv/lv/publikacijas-un-statistika/statistika-par-izglitibu/statistika-par-visparejo-izglitibu/2014-2015-m-g
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. xiii
Liepiņa, S. (2008). Speciālā psiholoģija. Rīga: RaKa.
Loks, Dž. (1977). Eseja par cilvēka sapratni. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
MK Regulations, No. 468 “Noteikumi par valsts pamatizglītības standartu, pamatizglītības mācību priekšmetu standartiem un pamatizglītības programmu paraugiem”, (2014). Downloaded from likumi.lv/doc.php?id=268342
Piažē, Ž. (2002). Bērna intelektuālā attīstība. Rīga: Pētergailis.
Race, P (2010). Making Learning Happen. 2nd Edition, London: Sage Publications.
Rogers, C. R. (1994). Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education Might Become. Columbus: CE. Merrill Publishing, publiced 1969, x.
Sample special primary education program for students with moderate / severe disabilities and severe developmental disorders, (2009). Downloaded from http://visc.gov.lv/specizglitiba/dokumenti/programmas/smag/majturiba1-9_spec_smag.pdf
Špona, A. (2001). Audzināšanas teorija un prakse. Rīga: RaKa.
Vedins, I. (2008). Zinātne un patiesība. Rīga: Avots.
Vigotskis, Ļ. (2002). Domāšana un runa. R.: EVE.
Выготский, Л.С. (1983). Собрание сочинений в 6 томах. Т. 5: Основы дефектологии. Москва: Педагогика.
Выготский, Л.С. (2005). Психология развития человека. Москва: Изд-во Смысл; Изд-во Эксмо,
Рубинштейн, С. Я. (1986). Психология умственно отсталого школьника. 3 – е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва: Просвещение.
Цируль, К. (1890). Ручной труд в народной школе. Москва, 31 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
