• Jelena Kolesnikova Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Viktorija Perepjolkina Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Kristine Martinsone Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)
  • Ainars Stepens Rīga Stradiņš University (LV)



integrative approach, functioning impairment, Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory, mental disorders, psychological assessment


The purpose of this article is to present a theoretical integrative model, which reflects contemporary tendencies in the understanding of mental disorders and functional impairment, and which is used as a theoretical frame for the development of the Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory (LCPI). This article, based on the latest research findings in the field, supports the necessity of a combined analysis of mental disorders and functional impairment. Due to scientific findings and deeper understanding of the interrelation between mental disorders and functioning impairment, it has become possible to develop psychological instruments for valid assessment of the disturbances in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, and  behaviour combining with analysis of most essential and relevant aspects of their functioning. An integrative theoretical model of LCPI, developed on the selected criteria from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM – 5; APA, 2013) and WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF; WHO, 2001/2015) is presented in the article. Conducted literature analysis permits to conclude, that in a context of clinical personality assessment, a combined analysis of symptoms of mental disorders and relevant functioning criteria is very promising and will be useful in many assessment contexts. Based on such an integrative approach the Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory is currently being developed. This project is a part of the National Research Programme (No. 5.8.2.).

Supporting Agencies
The National Research Programme (No. 5.8.2.). Rīga Stradiņš University, Department of Health Psychology and Pedagogy.


Download data is not yet available.


American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arlington VA: American Psychiatric Association.

Brutt, A. L., Schulz, H., Andreas, S. (2013). Development of an ICF-based core set of activities and participation for patients with mental disorders: an approach based upon data. Clinical rehabilitation, 27(8), pp. 758-767.

Buist-Bouwman, M. A., De Graaf, R., Vollebergh, W. M., Alonso, J., Bruffaerts, R., &Ormel, J. (2006). Functional disability of mental disorders and comparison with physical disorders: a study among the general population of six European countries. ActaPsychiatricaScandinavica, 113(6), 492-500.

Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI–2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress.

Butcher, J. N., & Perry, J. N. (2008). Personality Assessment in Treatment Planning: Use of the MMPI-2 and BTPI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cieza, A., Chatterji, S., Andersen, C., Cantista, P., Herceg, et al. (2004). ICF Core sets for depression. Journal of Rehabilitation. Medicine, 44, 128-134.

Clark, L.A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257.

First, M. B. (2009). Harmonisation of ICD-11 and DSM-V: opportunities and challenges. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 195(5), 382-390. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060822

Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, Ó.,Rojo, E., Vieta, E., et al. (2015). Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 353-360. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028

Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, O., Rojo, J. E., Cuesta, M. J., et al. (2012). Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 138(2-3), 240-247. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.031

Hengartner, M., Müller, M., Rodgers, S., Rössler, W., & Ajdacic-Gross, V. (2014). Occupational functioning and work impairment in association with personality disorder trait-scores. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(2), 327-335. doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0739-2

ICF Research Branch (2013a).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Depression.

ICF Research Branch (2013b).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Bipolar Disorders.

ICF Research Branch (2013c).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Schizophrenia. International Test Commission (2001). International Guidelines for Test Use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93-114.

Keeley, J. W., Flanagan, E. H., & McCluskey, D. L. (2014). Functional impairment and the DSM-5 dimensional system for personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(5), 657-674. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_133

Koļesnikova, J. (2013). Drug-addicted Personality disorders and Problem-solving in the rehabilitation process. Doctoral thesis, University of Latvia.

Luciano, M. (2015). The ICD-11 beta draft is available online. World

Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(3), 375-376. doi:10.1002/wps.20262

McClure, M. M., Harvey, P. D., Bowie, C. R., Iacoviello, B., &Siever, L. J. (2013). Functional outcomes, functional capacity, and cognitive impairment in schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 144(1-3), 146-150. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.012

Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (2006). MCMI-III manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: Pearson Assessment.

Reed, G. M., Leonardi, M., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Materzanini, A., Castronuovo, et al. (2009). Implementing the ICF in a psychiatric rehabilitation setting for People with Serious Mental Illness in the Lombardy region of Italy. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31, 170-173. doi:10.3109/09638280903317955

Regier, D. A., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 12(2), 92-98. doi:10.1002/wps.20050

Samuel, D. B., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Ball, S. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating the proposed DSM-5 types and traits. Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications. Paper 13.

Sarma, Z. M. (2005). Adaptation of The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2 to Latvia. Doctoral thesis, University of Latvia.

Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1, 355-380.

Ustün, B. & Kennedy, C. (2009). What is "functional impairment"? Disentangling disability from clinical significance. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 8(2), 82-85.

Widiger, T.A. &Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.

Widiger, T.A., & Trull, T.J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.

World Health Organization (1994). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, ICD-10, Tenth Revision, Volume 1, 2, 3. Geneva.

World Health Organization (2001/2015). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization. Geneva. (Electronical resource) URL:

Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K.E., Pincus, A. L., &Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 121(4), 951–95.




How to Cite

Kolesnikova, J., Perepjolkina, V., Martinsone, K., & Stepens, A. (2016). THE THEORETICAL INTEGRATIVE MODEL FOR THE LATVIAN CLINICAL PERSONALITY INVENTORY. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 388-398.