THE THEORETICAL INTEGRATIVE MODEL FOR THE LATVIAN CLINICAL PERSONALITY INVENTORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol1.1518Keywords:
integrative approach, functioning impairment, Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory, mental disorders, psychological assessmentAbstract
The purpose of this article is to present a theoretical integrative model, which reflects contemporary tendencies in the understanding of mental disorders and functional impairment, and which is used as a theoretical frame for the development of the Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory (LCPI). This article, based on the latest research findings in the field, supports the necessity of a combined analysis of mental disorders and functional impairment. Due to scientific findings and deeper understanding of the interrelation between mental disorders and functioning impairment, it has become possible to develop psychological instruments for valid assessment of the disturbances in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, and behaviour combining with analysis of most essential and relevant aspects of their functioning. An integrative theoretical model of LCPI, developed on the selected criteria from Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM – 5; APA, 2013) and WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF; WHO, 2001/2015) is presented in the article. Conducted literature analysis permits to conclude, that in a context of clinical personality assessment, a combined analysis of symptoms of mental disorders and relevant functioning criteria is very promising and will be useful in many assessment contexts. Based on such an integrative approach the Latvian Clinical Personality Inventory is currently being developed. This project is a part of the National Research Programme (No. 5.8.2.).
References
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.). Arlington VA: American Psychiatric Association.
Brutt, A. L., Schulz, H., Andreas, S. (2013). Development of an ICF-based core set of activities and participation for patients with mental disorders: an approach based upon data. Clinical rehabilitation, 27(8), pp. 758-767.
Buist-Bouwman, M. A., De Graaf, R., Vollebergh, W. M., Alonso, J., Bruffaerts, R., &Ormel, J. (2006). Functional disability of mental disorders and comparison with physical disorders: a study among the general population of six European countries. ActaPsychiatricaScandinavica, 113(6), 492-500.
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). MMPI–2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of MinnesotaPress.
Butcher, J. N., & Perry, J. N. (2008). Personality Assessment in Treatment Planning: Use of the MMPI-2 and BTPI. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cieza, A., Chatterji, S., Andersen, C., Cantista, P., Herceg, et al. (2004). ICF Core sets for depression. Journal of Rehabilitation. Medicine, 44, 128-134.
Clark, L.A. (2007). Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 227-257.
First, M. B. (2009). Harmonisation of ICD-11 and DSM-V: opportunities and challenges. The British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, 195(5), 382-390. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060822
Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, Ó.,Rojo, E., Vieta, E., et al. (2015). Disability in bipolar I disorder: the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 353-360. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028
Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, O., Rojo, J. E., Cuesta, M. J., et al. (2012). Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 138(2-3), 240-247. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.031
Hengartner, M., Müller, M., Rodgers, S., Rössler, W., & Ajdacic-Gross, V. (2014). Occupational functioning and work impairment in association with personality disorder trait-scores. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 49(2), 327-335. doi:10.1007/s00127-013-0739-2
ICF Research Branch (2013a).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Depression. https://www.icf-research-branch.org/download/category/9-mentalhealth
ICF Research Branch (2013b).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Bipolar Disorders. https://www.icf-research-branch.org/download/category/9-mentalhealth
ICF Research Branch (2013c).Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Schizophrenia.https://www.icf-research-branch.org/download/category/9-mentalhealth International Test Commission (2001). International Guidelines for Test Use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93-114.Keeley, J. W., Flanagan, E. H., & McCluskey, D. L. (2014). Functional impairment and the DSM-5 dimensional system for personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28(5), 657-674. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_133
Koļesnikova, J. (2013). Drug-addicted Personality disorders and Problem-solving in the rehabilitation process. Doctoral thesis, University of Latvia.
Luciano, M. (2015). The ICD-11 beta draft is available online. World
Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(3), 375-376. doi:10.1002/wps.20262
McClure, M. M., Harvey, P. D., Bowie, C. R., Iacoviello, B., &Siever, L. J. (2013). Functional outcomes, functional capacity, and cognitive impairment in schizotypal personality disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 144(1-3), 146-150. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.012
Millon, T., Millon, C., Davis, R., & Grossman, S. (2006). MCMI-III manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis: Pearson Assessment.
Reed, G. M., Leonardi, M., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Materzanini, A., Castronuovo, et al. (2009). Implementing the ICF in a psychiatric rehabilitation setting for People with Serious Mental Illness in the Lombardy region of Italy. Disability & Rehabilitation, 31, 170-173. doi:10.3109/09638280903317955
Regier, D. A., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 12(2), 92-98. doi:10.1002/wps.20050
Samuel, D. B., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Ball, S. A. (2012). An expert consensus approach to relating the proposed DSM-5 types and traits. Department of Psychological Sciences Faculty Publications. Paper 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023787
Sarma, Z. M. (2005). Adaptation of The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory – 2 to Latvia. Doctoral thesis, University of Latvia.
Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 1, 355-380.
Ustün, B. & Kennedy, C. (2009). What is "functional impairment"? Disentangling disability from clinical significance. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of The World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 8(2), 82-85.
Widiger, T.A. &Simonsen, E. (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding a common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110–130.
Widiger, T.A., & Trull, T.J. (2007). Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62, 71-83.
World Health Organization (1994). International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, ICD-10, Tenth Revision, Volume 1, 2, 3. Geneva.
World Health Organization (2001/2015). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization. Geneva. (Electronical resource) URL: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
Wright, A. G. C., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K.E., Pincus, A. L., &Krueger, R. F. (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 121(4), 951–95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
