PROVISION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OF TEACHERS IN INCLUSIVE EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2018vol1.3378Keywords:
inclusive education, professional competence of teachers, professional development, quality of educationAbstract
Many educational researchers explain and appreciate the special importance of improving the professional competence of teachers in this era of change in Latvia when the Ministry of Education and Science has envisaged one of the most comprehensive reforms by implementing competency based education. Inclusive education implies that teachers have to master appropriate general skills which will help them to grasp topicalities, to be the leaders of changes and to adequately innovate the learning process where all different needs of learners are met by increasing participation opportunities of each and everybody in learning, culture and different communities and by reducing exclusion within and from educational process. The aim of the study was to clarify the point of view of teachers about the quality of content of the provided professional development. The set of questionnaires was developed by teachers of general education institution where learners with special needs were included. The survey studied the motivation of teachers to participate in professional development courses/seminars/projects; the opinion of respondents about the organization, form and content of continuing professional development in line with their needs. Conclusions: The development of professional competence of teachers in Latvia on national level is implemented according to the pedagogical needs modelling method which supports autonomy and which is self-guided by free self-education initiative of teachers. The survey is based on the fact that teachers lack knowledge and skills to appropriately assess and formulate their continuous professional development needs.References
Andersone, R. (2009). Skolotāju profesionālā kompetence sabiedrības ilgtspējīgai attīstība. Pedagoģija un skolotāju izglītība, 747, 8-19.
Auguste, B., Kihn, P., & Miller, M. (2010). Closing the talent gap: Attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. Mc.Kinsey&Company.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill H. (2005). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Collinson,V., Kozina, E., & Lin, Y. (2009). Professional Development for teachers: a world of Change. European Journal of teacher Education, Vol.32 (1), 3.-19.
Fedels Č., Bialika M., & Trilings B. (2017). Četru dimensiju izglītība. Lielvārds.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Amsterdam, NY: teachers college press.
Harford, J. (2010). Teacher education in Ireland and the challenges of the twenty-first century. European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 33, No 4, 349 – 360.
Izglītības attīstības pamatnostādnes 2014. - 2020.gadam. (2014). Lejuplādēts no http://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=266406 .
Izglītības likums. (1999). Lejuplādēts no https://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=50759&version_date=01.06.1999
Jansma, F. (2011). Teacher Quality: Professional competence and the quality of education. Paper given at Teacher Education for Inclusion project Country Study Visit, University of Cyprus, March 2011.
Kelly, M. P., & John, R. S. (2005). A case study of one school systems adoption and implementation of an elementary science program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (42)1, 25- 52.
Koķe, T. (1999). Pieaugušo izglītības attīstība: raksturīgākās iezīmes. Rīga: Mācību apgāds NT.
Koķe, T. (2001). Cilvēka mūžizglītība sociāli pedagoģiskajā kontekstā, Latvijas vēstnesis Nr.186 (2573).
Latham, N., & Vogt, W. Do Professional development of schools reduce teacher attrition? European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 28, No 4, 153-167.
MK noteikumi Nr. 662. (2014). Noteikumi par pedagogiem nepieciešamo izglītību un profesionālo kvalifikāciju un pedagogu profesionālās kompetences pilnveides kārtību. Lejuplādēts no https://likumi.lv/ta/id/269965-noteikumi-par-pedagogiem-nepieciesamo-izglitibu-un-profesionalo-kvalifikaciju-un-pedagogu-profesionalas-kompetences-pilnveides
O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2009). Educational psychology: reflection for action 2nd edition. Danvers, MA: John Wiley & sons Inc.
OECD. (2007). No more failures: Ten steps to equity in education, Parīze
Ornstein, A.C., Hunskins (1998). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues. Allan and Bacon.
Rodriguez, H. (2010). Seven Essential components for Teacher Education for Inclusion. Lejuplādēts no http:www.inclusive-education-in-action.org/iea/index.php?menuid=25&reporeid=247
SEC. (2008). Uzlabot prasmes 21.gadsimtam. Programma Eiropas sadarbībai skolu jomā. Briselē, Lejuplādēts no http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0425:FIN:LV:PDF
Skola 2030. (2017). Izglītība mūsdienīgai lietpratībai: mācību satura un pieejas apraksts. Lejuplādēts no https://www.skola2030.lv/
Thurston, A., Christie, C. J., Howe, A., & Topping, T. (2008). Effects of CPD on group work practices in Scottish primary schools. Professional Development in Education, Vol.34, No 3, 263-282.
UNESCO (2005). Iekļaušanas vadlīnijas: nodrošināt visiem pieeju izglītībai. Parīze: UNESCO
UNESCO (2009). Politikas vadlīnijas par iekļaušanu izglītībā. Parīze:UNESCO
WHO (2011). Pasaules ziņojums par funkcionāliem traucējumiem. Ženēva, Šveice, PVO
Žogla, I. (2006). Educating Teachers for Quality Teaching. Riga: Izglītības soļi, 24-31.