Feminist Identity: The Feministic Identity Development Scale, psychometrical and adaption in environment of Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol3.361Keywords:
Feministic identity, FIDS, FIAS, inquiry, psychometrical indices, the adaptation of instrument, the development of identityAbstract
The feminism is becoming more popular in Latvia now, but it’s impossible to find some psichological instrument which is adapted in latvian language and which is useabled for measuring the charecteristic’s of feminist identity. In this article are displayed the Feministic Identity Development Scale (FIAS- in latvian) (the origional inquiry :Feministic Identity Development Scale (FIDS), Bargad & Hyde, 1991), thous diferent versions of their adaption and also versions of their modifications; Cronbach’s Alpha from 0.5 to 0.8, and their version in latvian language.
The adaptation of FIAS took part in three stages, the sample of the research consists only from women. The first sample consists form 330 women in age from 18 to 27 (M=18,75; SD=1,06) years old. The second and third sample consist form 501 women from 18 to 27 (M=20,33; SD=1,94) years old. The sample of Test- retest: 30 respondents.
In the course of the instrument adaptation in the psychometrical analysis was appointed: the summary of FIAS factorial modification version, the factorial validity, the analysis of the affirmatory factors, the convergential and divergential validity of FIAS.The results gained in the course of inguiry the factorial modification version of FIAS- are acknowledged to be acceptable and instruments of the inguiry of the identity crisis – approved to be useful for futher usage in investigation and can be practically used for psychological researches in Latvia.
References
Bargad, A., & Hyde J. S. (1991). Women’s studies. A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181–201.
Berman, S. L., Montogomery M. J., & Kurtines W. M. (2004). The development and validation of a measure of identity distress. Identity:An International Journal Of Theory and Research, 4,1–8.
Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisko., CA: Jossey–Bass.
Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek., J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321 – 330.
Cross, W. E. (1971). The negro to black conversion expierence. Toward a psychology of black liberation. Black World, 20(9), 13–27.
Dombrovskis A. (2014) Latvijas sieviešu feministiskās identitātes dimensijas prognozējošie faktori. Promocijas darbs. Daugavpils Universitāte. (In Latvian).
Downing, N. E., & Roush, K. L. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709.
Duncan, L. E. (2010). Women’s relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 498–507.
Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficancy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233–244.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues Monograph, 1(1), 1–171.
Fischer, A. R., Tokar D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A., (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, Cambridge University Press., 24 (1), 15–29.
Grant, J.(1993). Fundamental feminism. Routledge. New York. London.
Good, G. E., Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A., (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15–29.
Hansen, N. D. (2002). Reflections on feminist identity development: Implications for theory, measurement, and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1),87–95.
Henderson-King, H. D., & Stewart, A. J. (1997). Feminist consciousness: Perspective on women’s experience. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 415–426.
Henderson-King, D., H., & Stewart, A. J. (1994). Women or feminists? Assessing women’s group consciousness. Sex Roles, 31, 505 – 516.
Hyde, J. S. (2002). Feminist identity development: The current state of theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1),105–110.
Houvouras, S., & Carter, J. S. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23(2),234 – 256.
Huddy, L., Neely, F. K., & Lafay, M. R. (2000). The polls – trends: Support for the women’s movement. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 309 – 350.
Kamen, P. (1991). Feminist fatale. New York: Donald I. Fine.
Kramarae, C., & Spender, D. (2000). Routledge international encyclopedia of women: Global women’s issues and knowledge. New York.Routledge.
Liss, M. & Erchull, M. J. (2010). Everyone feels empowered: Understanding feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 85–96.
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133.
McCabe, J. (2005). What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self identification and „feminist” attitudes among U.S. women and men.Gender and Society, 4(2), 480–505.
Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002a). Feminist identity development measures: Comparing the psychometrics of three measures. The Counseling Psychologist, 30(1),66–86.
Moss, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (2009). Family Environment Scale. Manual and sampler set: Development, applications and research. (4th Ed.). Published by Mind Garden, Inc.
Myaskovsky, L., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861–883.
Raščevska, M. (2005). Psiholoģisko testu un aptauju konstruēšana un adaptācija. Rīga: Raka.
Ricard, K. (1989). The relationship of self-monitored dating behaviors to level of feminist identity on the FIS. Sex Roles, 20, 213–226.
Rhode, D. L. (1997). Speaking of sex. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S., & Miller, C. T. (2007). Effects of stereotypes about femnists on feminists self-identification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 146 – 156.
Saunders, K. J., & Kashubeck-West, S. (2006). The relations among feminist identity development, gender-role orientation, and psychological well-being in women., Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 199 – 211.
Tarrant, S. (2008). (Eds.) Men speak out: Views on gender, sex, and power. Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. New York and London.
Tarrant, S. (2009). Men and feminism. Seal Press. California.
Toller, P. W., Suter E. A., & Trautman, T. C. (2004). Gender role identity and attitudes toward feminism. Sex Roles,51(1–2), 85–90.
Vandiver, B. J., Cross, W. E., Jr., Worrell, F. C., & Flagen-Smith, E. (2002). Validating the Cross Racial Identity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(1), 71 – 85.
White, A. (2006). Racial and gender attitudes as predictors of feminist activism among self-identified African American feminists. Journal of Black Psychology, 32, 455 – 478.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but....”. Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904.
Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, „I’m not a feminist, but....”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435.
Yakushko, O. (2007). Do feminist women feel better about their lives? Examining patterns of feminist identity development and women’s subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 57, (3/4), 223–234.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
