PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND INTEREST IN THE PROCESS OF LATVIAN STATE ADMINISTRATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol6.3776Keywords:
civic competencies, government communication, public participation, state administrationAbstract
Democratic state administration needs interaction with the public, which requires not only government communication with the public but also the public interest and understanding in the political and public administration processes. The task of public administration is to create a legal and institutional framework and mechanisms for public participation, while NGOs and the general public need civil competency to use the opportunities of public participation. Analysing the Latvian government's communication activities related to public participation and public awareness, the aim of this paper is to examine the level of participation of different social groups and the impact of their awareness on it. Within the framework of the research, the following methods have been used: analysis of normative documents, statistics on the implementation of the Memorandum of cooperation between the government and non-governmental organizations, interviews with experts from NGOs and state administration, focus group discussions with young people. Analysing legal documents and statistics on the involvement of NGOs, public participation platforms and their use have been evaluated. Based on the views of NGOs and state administration experts, there are certain factors that influence the level of public participation and public awareness. Focus group discussions with young people have identified their awareness and interest in public administration processes as well as their civic participation. The research study found that the state administration has created a variety of platforms for the involvement of NGOs in decision-making processes and an increase in the participation of NGOs. By choosing young people as one of the social groups of society, it can be concluded that information about public participation does not reach the general public, thus it has little effect on the formation of the general public's awareness and the level of participation.
References
Auers, D. (2017). Populism in the Baltic States. In: Kudors, A., Pabriks, A. (Eds.) The Rise of Populism: Lessons for the European Union and the United States of America. Rīga: University of Latvia, pp. 151–167
Bernstein, J. L. (2007). Simulations and the dynamics of racial and gender gaps in civic competence. New Directions for Teaching & Learning (111), pp. 89–96.
Carretero, M., Haste, H., Bermudez, A. (2016). Civic Education. In Corno, L., Anderman, E.M. (Eds.) Handbook of Educational Psychology. 3rd Edition. London: Routledge Publishers, pp. 295-308.
Čekse, I., Geske, A., Grīnfelds A., (2014). Pilsoniskuma un rīcībspējas veidošanās izglītības procesā. No Rozenvalds, J., Zobena, A. (2014) Daudzveidīgās un mainīgās Latvijas identitātes. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 270-283 lpp.
Eurobarometr 88. Public Opinion in European Union. Autumn 2017. (2017). Pieejams: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/STANDARD/surveyKy/2143
Galvin, M., Siano, A., Cuomo, M. T. (2011). Innovative Communication Trends in the Public Administration – a Democratic Marketing Tool or Just Another Fallacy. Pieejams:.it/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10556/244/tesi%20M.%20Galvin.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Informācija par NVO un Ministru kabineta sadarbības memorandu. (2018) Pieejams: https://www.mk.gov.lv/content/informacija-par-nvo-un-ministru-kabineta-sadarbibas-memorandu
Kudors, A., Pabriks, A. (2017). The Rise of Populism: Lessons for the European Union and the United States of America. Rīga: University of Latvia, 185 p.
Kymlicka, W. (2003). Multicultural States and Intercultural Citizens. Theory and Research in Education, 1(2), pp. 147–169.
Lawson, H. S. (2002). Introduction. In: Scott, D., Lawson, H. (Eds.). Citizenship Education at the Curriculum. Wstport, London: Ablex Publishing, pp. 1–7.
Majore M. Nevalstisko organizāciju un valdības sadarbība Latvijā. In: Ozoliņa, Ž., Muižnieks, N. (Eds.) Uncertain Transformation – New Domestic and International Challenges. - Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte, 2006. – 133-147. lpp.
Ministru kabineta kārtības rullis. Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.300. Pieņemti 07.04.2009. Publicēts: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 16.04.2009, Nr. 58. Pēdējie grozījumi 03.12.2016.
Rosenzweigova, I., Skoric, V., Asipovich, H. (2016) Civil Participation in Decision-Making Processes: An Overview of Standards and Practices in Council of Europe Member States. Pieejams: https://rm.coe.int/168068690f
Sabiedrisko organizāciju, to apvienību, biedrību un nodibinājumu dibināšanas dinamika. (2018) Pieejams: https://www.lursoft.lv/lursoft_statistika/?&id=41
Sabiedrības līdzdalības kārtība attīstības plānošanas procesā. Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr.970, pieņemti 25.08.2009. Publicēts: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 04.09.2009, Nr. 141. Pēdējie grozījumi 01.07.2013.
Valsts pārvaldes politikas attīstības pamatnostādnēm 2008.–2013.gadam. (2008) Pieejams: https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=176343
Valsts pārvaldes politikas attīstības pamatnostādnēs 2014.-2020.gadam. (2014). Pieejams: http://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=271384
Van Wart, M.., XiaoHu, W. (2007.) When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67 (2), pp. 265–278
Varnham, S. (2005). Citizenship in schools: the gap between theory and practice. Education and the Law, 17 (1-2), pp. 53–64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
