• Gilberto Marzano Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Janusz Korczak University in Warsaw (IT)
  • Joanna Lizut Janusz Korczak University in Warsaw (PL)
  • Luis Ochoa Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach (PL)



digital social innovation, school social workers, social educators, digital competencies, technology education


In this  article, the authors argue that professional experts are necessary who should also be educators, since they should work inside the school. Accordingly, cyber safety competencies should be included in the curriculum of school social workers in the same way as are competencies to sustain children with behavioral disturbance, support students with cultural and economic difficulties, provide the school community with psycho-social counselling, implement educational policies, etc. From the experience of running a training course for social workers in Poland on cyber threats, and from an ongoing research concerning digital social innovation within two EU funded projects, a preliminary portfolio of competencies has been defined and presented.


Download data is not yet available.


Bria, F., Sestini, F., Gasco, M., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., Almirall, E., & Kresin, F. (2015). Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe: DSI Final Report. Brussels: European Commission.

Chang, C. (2010). Internet safety survey: Who will protect the children? Berkeley technology Law journal, 25(1), 501-527. DOI:

Cremin, H., & Bevington, T. (2017). Positive Peace in Schools: Tackling conflict and creating a culture of peace in the classroom. Routledge.

Delpechitre, D., Black, H.G., & Farrish, J. (2018). The dark side of technology: examining the impact of technology overload on salespeople. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. DOI: .

Dooley, J.J., Pyżalski, J., & Cross, D. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182-188. DOI:

Elhai, J.D., Levine, J.C., Dvorak, R.D., & Hall, B.J. (2016). Fear of missing out, need for touch, anxiety and depression are related to problematic smartphone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 509-516. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079.

Gainsbury, M.S., Hing, N., Delfabbro, P.H., & King, D.L. (2014). A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies. International Gambling Studies, 14(2), 196-213.

García-Castilla, F.J., De-Juanas Oliva, Á., Vírseda-Sanz, E., & Páez Gallego, J. (2018). Educational potential of e-social work: social work training in Spain. European Journal of Social Work, 1-11.

Griffiths, M.D. (2000). Internet addiction - Time to be taken seriously? Addiction Research, 8, 413-418.

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. Sage.

Kim, J.H. (2017). Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 282-291.

Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2008). Risky experiences for children online: Charting European research on children and the internet. Children & society, 22(4), 314-323.

Marzano, G., & Lizut, J. (2019a). Cyberbullying and the Critical Importance of Educational Resources for Prevention and Intervention, IGI-Global.

Marzano, G., & Lizut, J. (2019b). Topical issues on cyberbullying prevention, International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems and Technologies (IJICST). (in press).

McDaniel, B.T., Galovan, A.M., Cravens, J.D., & Drouin, M. (2018). “Technoference” and implications for mothers’ and fathers’ couple and co-parenting relationship quality. Computers in human behavior, 80, 303-313.

McDonald, S., Fineran, S., Constable, R., & Moriarty, A. (2006). Interpersonal Violence in schools: developing safe and responsive school communities. In Constable, R.T., McDonald, S., & Flynn, J.P. (Eds.) School social work: Practice, policy, and research perspectives. Lyceum Books Inc., 618-646.

Meredith, J.P. (2010). Combating cyberbullying: Emphasizing education over criminalization. Fed. Comm. LJ, 63, 311-340.

Monaghan, S., Derevensky, J., & Sklar, A. (2008). Impact of gambling advertisements and marketing on children and adolescents: Policy recommendations to minimise harm. Journal of gambling issues, (22), 252-274.

Nelson, J.L., Palonsky, S.B., & McCarthy, M.R. (2017). Critical issues in education: Dialogues and dialectics. Waveland Press.

Rafferty, J., & Waldman, J. (2006). Fit for virtual social work practice? Journal of Technology in Human Services, 24(2–3), 1–22.

Romer, D., & Moreno, M. (2017). Digital media and risks for adolescent substance abuse and problematic gambling. Pediatrics, 140 (Supplement 2), 102-106.

Rotondi, V., Stanca, L., & Tomasuolo, M. (2017). Connecting alone: Smartphone use, quality of social interactions and well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 63, 17-26. DOI:

Selwyn, N. (2018). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.

Simmons, K., & Bynum, Y. (2014). Cyberbullying: Six things administrators can do. Education, 134(4), 452-456.

Slonje, R., & Smith, P.K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian journal of psychology, 49(2), 147-154. DOI:

Slovak, K., & Singer, J.B. (2011). School social workers’ perceptions of cyberbullying. Children & Schools, 33(1), 5-16. DOI:

Spears, B., & Kofoed, J. (2013). Transgressing research binaries. In Smith, P.K. & Steffgen, G. Cyberbullying through social media, Psychology Press, 201-221.

Stokes, M., Baeck, P., & Baker, T. (2017). What next for digital social innovation. DSI4 Europe report. Available at: .

Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet addiction’: a critical review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4(1), 31-51.




How to Cite

Marzano, G., Lizut, J., & Ochoa, L. (2019). DIGITAL SOCIAL INNOVATION: A PRELIMINARY PORTFOLIO OF COMPETENCIES FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 320-329.