THE COMPREHENSION OF THE CONCEPTS OF NOISE AND SILENCE IN PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol3.4832Keywords:
classroom ergonomics, noise, silence, voice, teachers, primary school childrenAbstract
Acoustically ergonomic classrooms prevent teachers’ voice disorders and improve comprehension of learning instructions by pupils. High activity noise in the classroom, which increases voice loudness, is one of the most common complaints by teachers. The aim of the study was to find out how primary school children comprehend the concepts of noise and silence. Two hundred eighty five children representing Grade 1 to four were included in the study. Children were asked to draw how they imagine the silence and noise. Drawings were categorised in the following groups: sources of noise and silence, effects of noise and silence, noisy and silent places. Drawings imagining school environment were analysed separately. We found that primary school pupils can identify noise sources in the classroom, at home, and in environment. They can detect the impact of noise on the psycho-emotional state of the person. Children reflected a much more extensive range of noise generating activities than activities related to silence. The silence was mostly associated with sleeping and learning while noise with positive (singing, playing) and negative (screaming, fighting) actions.
Not only teachers but also pupils should know about classroom acoustic ergonomics. Teachers’ education programs should provide education in ergonomics, and teachers should forward this knowledge to children.
References
Bhang, S.-Y., Yoon, J., Sung, J., Yoo, C., Sim, C., Lee, C., … Lee, J. (2018). Comparing Attention and Cognitive Function in School Children across Noise Conditions: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Psychiatry Investigation, 15(6), 620–627.
Bermúdez de Alvear, R. M., Barón, F. J., & Martínez-Arquero, A. G. (2011). School Teachers’ Vocal Use, Risk Factors, and Voice Disorder Prevalence: Guidelines to Detect Teachers with Current Voice Problems. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 63(4), 209–215.
Calosso, G., Puglisi, G. E., Astolfi, A., Castellana, A., Carullo, A., & Pellerey, F. (2017). A one-school year longitudinal study of secondary school teachers’ voice parameters and the influence of classroom acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), 1055–1066.
Dockrell, J. E. & Shield, B. (2012). The Impact of Sound-Field Systems on Learning and Attention in Elementary School Classrooms. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 55(4), 1163–1176.
Gullestad, M. (1990). Doing interpretive analysis in a modern large-scale society: the meaning of peace and quiet in Norway. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology, 29, 38–61.
Hendy, L., Parke, S. (2010). Five main voices for effective teaching. The Ludo Press.
Jónsdottir, V.I., Boyle, B.E., Martin, P.J. & Sigurdardottir, G. (2002). A comparison of the occurrence and nature of vocal symptoms in two groups of Icelandic teachers. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 27, 98-105.
Mendes, A. L. F., Lucena, B. T. L. de, De Araújo, A. M. G. D., Melo, L. P. F. de, Lopes, L. W., & Silva, M. F. B. de L. (2016). Teacher’s voice: vocal tract discomfort symptoms, vocal intensity and noise in the classroom. Codas, 28(2), 168–175.
Radosz, J. (2012). Influence of classrooms acoustics on the teachers’ voice sound pressure level. Medycyna Pracy, 63(4), 409–417.
Rantala, L. M., Hakala, S., Holmqvist, S., & Sala, E. (2012a). Connections between voice ergonomic risk factors in classrooms and teachers’ voice production. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 64(6), 278–282.
Sala, E., Rantala, L.M. (2019). Speaking environment – background and activity noise and room acoustics. In L. Rantala & E. Sala (Eds.), Voice Ergonomics: Occupational and Professional Voice Care (pp. 30-49).
Sala, E., Rantala, L.M. (2019). Noise and Room Acoustics. In L. Rantala & E. Sala (Eds.), Voice Ergonomics: Occupational and Professional Voice Care (pp. 172-178).
Sala, E. (2019). Working Practices. In L. Rantala & E. Sala (Eds.), Voice Ergonomics: Occupational and Professional Voice Care (pp. 30-49).
Sato, H., Morimoto, M., & Wada, M. (2012). Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(6), 4596–4605.
Simberg, S., Sala, E., Vehmas, K., & Laine, A. (2005). Changes in the prevalence of vocal symptoms among teachers during a twelve-year period. Journal of Voice, 19(1), 95–102.
Trinite, B. (2017). Epidemiology of voice disorders in Latvian school teachers. Journal of Voice. 31(4), 508.e1–508.e9.
Trinite, B. (2019). Rumore, abitudini lavorative e dissturbi vocali autovalutati negli insegnanti [Noise, Working Practice and Self-reported Voice Disorders in Teachers]. Logopedia e Comunicazione, 15(3), 321–336.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
