• Inese Sadauska University of Latvia
  • Aleksandrs Koļesovs University of Latvia



factorial validity, flourishing, Flourishing Scale, subjective well-being, well-being


The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Latvian version of the Flourishing Scale (FS), created by Diener et al. (2010). FS is a brief self-report measure of the respondent’s well-being and success in areas of relationships, self-esteem, purpose, and optimism. The scale provides a single score across 8 items. The original FS was translated to Latvian and then back to English. The Satisfaction with Life Scale and Meaning in Life Questionnaire was applied for testing the convergent validity of the FS. Participants of the study were 191 people, ranged in age from 19 to 68 (159 women, mean age M = 30.62, SD = 9.50). Reliability analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) of the scale were performed. EFA indicated a one-factor structure. Results showed that the Latvian version of FS has good psychometric properties and demonstrated convergent validity. Testing of the original model by CFA resulted in acceptable fit indices.

Author Biographies

  • Inese Sadauska, University of Latvia
    Institution: University of Latvia, Riga, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, PhD student
  • Aleksandrs Koļesovs, University of Latvia
    University of Latvia, Riga, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art, asoc. prof. Dr.psych.


Aristotelis. (1985). Nicomachean Ethics. Rīga: Zvaigzne.

Cooke, P. J., Melchert, T. P., & Connor, K. (2016). Measuring Well-Being: A Review of Instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(5), 730–757.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227.

Didino, D., Taran, E. A., Barysheva, G. A., & Casati, F. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Russian version of the flourishing scale in a sample of older adults living in Siberia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1). Scopus.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.

Epikūrs. (2007). Letters. Insights. Fragments. Rīga: Liepnieks & Rītups

Giuntoli, L., Ceccarini, F., Sica, C., & Caudek, C. (2017). Validation of the Italian Versions of the Flourishing Scale and of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. SAGE Open, 7, 1-12.

Giuntoli, L., & Vidotto, G. (2020). Exploring Diener’s Multidimensional Conceptualization of Well-Being Through Network Psychometrics. Psychological Reports, 124(2), 896-919.

Goodman, F., Disabato, D., Kashdan, T., & Kauffman, S. (2017). Measuring well-being: A comparison of subjective well-being and PERMA. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-12.

Hone, L., Jarden, A., & Schofield, G. (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Flourishing Scale in a New Zealand Sample. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 1031-1045.

Howell, A. J., & Buro, K. (2015). Measuring and Predicting Student Well-Being: Further Evidence in Support of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experiences. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 903-915.

Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. C. (2013). Flourishing Across Europe: Application of a New Conceptual Framework for Defining Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837-861.

Huta, V. (2015). The Complementary Roles of Eudaimonia and Hedonia and How They Can Be Pursued in Practice. In Joseph, S. (Ed.), Positive Psychology in Practice. Promoting Human Flourishing in Work, Health, Education, and Everyday Life (159-182). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219-233.

Keyes, C. L. M. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(2), 207-222.

Kolesovs, A. (2017). Individual future orientation and demographic factors predicting life satisfaction. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Vol. 1, May 26th-27th, 534-543. http://10.17770/sie2017vol1.2448

Kolesovs, A. (2019). Adaptation of the meaning in life questionnaire in Latvian. Sociālo Zinātņu Vēstnesis, 1(28), ISSN 1691-1881, eISSN 2592-8562

Kyriazos, T. A., Stalikas, A., Prassa, K., Yotsidi, V., Galanakis, M., & Pezirkianidis, C. (2018). Validation of the Flourishing Scale (FS), Greek version and evaluation of two well-being models. Psychology, 9(07), 1789-1813.

Linton, M.-J., Dieppe, P., & Medina-Lara, A. (2016). Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: Exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open, 6(7), e010641.

Momtaz, Y. A., Hamid, T. A., Haron, S. A., & Bagat, M. F. (2016). Flourishing in later life. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 63, 85-91.

Perera, M. J., Meade, M. A., & DiPonio, L. (2018). Use and psychometric properties of the Flourishing Scale among adults with spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63(2), 250-257.

Ramírez-Maestre, C., Correa, M., Rivas, T., López-Martínez, A. E., Serrano-Ibáñez, E. R., & Esteve, R. (2017). Psychometric characteristics of the Flourishing Scale-Spanish Version (FS-SV). The factorial structure in two samples: Students and patients with chronic pain. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 30-36.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.

Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Pieterse, M. E., Drossaert, C. H. C., Westerhof, G. J., de Graaf, R., ten Have, M., Walburg, J. A., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2016). What Factors are Associated with Flourishing? Results from a Large Representative National Sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(4), 1351-1370.

Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness, well-being and how to achieve them. Nicholas Brealey Pub.

Sheldon, K. M. (2018). Understanding the good life. Eudaimonic living involves well-doing, not well-being. In Forgas, J. P., & Baumeister R. F. (Eds.), The social psychology of living well (pp 116-136). New York: Routledge.

Silva, A. J., & Caetano, A. (2013). Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 469-478.

Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80-93.

Sumi, K. (2014). Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience. Social Indicators Research, 118(2), 601-615.

Tong, K. K., & Wang, Y. Y. (2017). Validation of the flourishing scale and scale of positive and negative experience in a Chinese community sample. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0181616.

Upmane, A. (2012). Factors predicting life satisfaction: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Doctoral Thesis. University of Latvia, Riga.

Villieux, A., Sovet, L., Jung, S.-C., & Guilbert, L. (2016). Psychological flourishing: Validation of the French version of the Flourishing Scale and exploration of its relationships with personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 1-5.