THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHERS SELF- ASSESSMENT TO TEACH 21ST CENTURY SKILLS

Authors

  • Dace Namsone University of Latvia
  • Līga Čakāne University of Latvia
  • Dace Eriņa University of Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol2.6437

Keywords:

21st century teaching skills, teachers' self-assessment

Abstract

The context of educational reforms taking place in many countries gives special relevance, as the curriculum enters the 21st century skills or so-called transversal skills. It is necessary to ascertain how successful the teaching of these skills is already so that the school management together with teachers develop evidence-based or data-driven professional development solutions. The aim of the research is to create a theoretical framework and corresponding self-assessment tools, how the teacher can assess for himself to what extent he has succeeded in achieving the competence to teach students in the 21st century skills required to achieve the goals set by the school in the context of the ongoing education reform in the country. For the self-assessment of teachers’ competencies, performance appraisal is used, comparing to what extent does teaching in a particular case correspond to good practice using performance level descriptors as tools - a set of teachers' learning progressions and tests. The developed set of teachers' professional learning progressions is based on data-based and field-tested analytical descriptions of performance levels from expert work. It includes 17 progressions developed within the framework of categories and criteria, the practical testing of which in school practice is planned in the authors' further research.

Author Biographies

  • Dace Namsone, University of Latvia
    University of Latvia, Education and innovation centre. Director of the Center (basic unit), leading researcher, project manager.
  • Līga Čakāne, University of Latvia
    University of Latvia, Education and innovation centre. Researcher.
  • Dace Eriņa, University of Latvia
    University of Latvia, Education and innovation centre. Research assistant.

References

AITSL. (2011). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved from: https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/apst-resources/australian_professional_standard_for_teachers_final.pdf

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133–180.

Bērtule, D., Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., Čakāne, L., Butkēviča, A. (2019). Framework of Teacher Performance Assessment to Support Teaching 21st Century Skills. Manuscript submitted for Proceedings for International Technology, Education and Development (INTED).

Butkēviča, A., Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., Zandbergs, U., Čakāne, L., Bērtule. D. (2019). Designing and Piloting Online Tests as Part of a Teacher Competence Assessment. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference, Volume V, 333-343. Presented in Rezekne, Latvia, May 24. 2019. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2019vol5.3846

Cauglan, S., Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and Teacher Quality: Critical Analysis of Observational Insturments in Preservice Teacher Performance Assesment, Journal of Teacher Education. 65 (5), 375 – 388.

Center for Educational Leadership (CEL). (2017). Dimensions of the 5D+ Teacher Evaluation Rubric. University of Washington. Retrieved from: https://www.k-12leadership.org/

Danielson, C. (2013). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. Instructionally Focused Edition.

Danielson, C., & McGreal, T.L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., Butkēviča, A., Čakāne, L. (2019). Assessment for identifying teacher competence gap in the context for improving teaching 21st century skills. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation ICERI, 11-13 November 2019 Seville, Spain. IATED Academy, 5555-5563.

Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., Butkēviča, A., Čakāne, L. (2021). Teacher competence gap identification by using an online test. Proceedings of the 15th annual International Technology, Education and Development INTED online Conference, 8th-9th of March, 2021.

Dudareva, I., Namsone, D., Čakāne, L. (2015). The use of ICT in the science lessons: Experience from Latvia. In: V. Lamanauskas, V. Šlekienė and L. Ragulienė, eds. State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives, Proceedings of the International Conference BalticSTE, 15-18 June 2015 Siauliai, Lithuania. Siauliai, Lithuania: Scientia Socialis, 39-41.

Farr, S. (2010). Teaching as Leadership: the Highly Effectice Teacher’s Guide to Closing the Achievement Gap, Jossey-Bass, USA.

France, I., Namsone, D., & Čakāne, L. (2015). What research shows about mathematics teachers’ learning needs: experience from Latvia. SOCIETY, INTEGRATION, EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2015, Volume II, Rezekne: Rezeknes Academy of Technologies, Latvia, 45-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2015vol2.457

Goe, L. (2007). The link between teacher quality and student outcomes: A research synthesis. National comprehensive center for teacher quality.

Hatty, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Helmke, A. (2009). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität – Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts. Seelze: Klett - Kallmeyer in.

Helmke, A. (2009). Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität – Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts. Seelze: Klett - Kallmeyer in.

Hitt, D. H., Pamela, D., Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86 (2), 531-569.

Huber, S.G., & Skedsmo, G. (2016). Teacher evaluation - accountability and improving teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(2).

Jayaram, K., Moffit, A., Scott, D. (2012). Breaking the habit of ineffective professional development for teachers, McKinsey on Society, McKinsey & Company.

Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., Koenig, J., Busse, A., Doehrmann, M., Hoth, J. (2017). Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers—Cognitive versus situated approaches. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 161-182.

Kegan, R. (2002). Mental demands of modern life: Implications for defining competencies. Keynote address DeSeCo Symposium, Geneva, February 11–13, 2002. Retrieved from: http://www.portal-stat.admin.ch/deseco/deseco_int02.htm

Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Werner B., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand M. (2013). (eds.), Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom 25 and Professional Competence of Teachers, Mathematics Teacher Education 8, New York: Springer Science+Business Media.

Latvijas Izglītības un zinātnes darbinieku arodbiedrība (LIZDA). (2016). Skolotāja profesijas prestižs Latvijā. Pieejams: Skolotaju-prestizs.pdf (lizda.lv)

Lāce, I. (2014). Pedagoģiskais pašvērtējums topošā skolotāja karjeras attīstībā. (Promocijas darbs, Liepāja, Latvija). Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/Matiss/Desktop/Daces%20dok/LU%20SIIC/Publik%C4%81cijas/Skol.%20pa%C5%A1n,%20r%C4%ABks%20R%C4%93zekne%202021/Skolot%20pasnov_Inguna_Lace_%20promocijas%20darbs%202014.pdf

LR Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 416. (2019). Noteikumi par valsts vispārējās vidējās izglītības standartu un vispārējās vidējās izglītības programmu paraugiem. Pieejams: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/309597-noteikumi-par-valsts-visparejas-videjas-izglitibas-standartu-un-visparejas-videjas-izglitibas-programmu-paraugiem

LR Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 569. (2018). Noteikumi par pedagogiem nepieciešamo izglītību un profesionālo kvalifikāciju un pedagogu profesionālās kompetences pilnveides kārtību. Pieejams: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/301572-noteikumi-par-pedagogiem-nepieciesamo-izglitibu-un-profesionalo-kvalifikaciju-un-pedagogu-profesionalas-kompetences-pilnveides-kartibu

Marzano, R.J., Kendall, J. S. (2007). The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Hawker Brownlow Education. Retrieved from: https://files.hbe.com.au/samplepages/CO2399.pdf

Microsoft Partners in Learning (MPIL). (2015) 21st Century Learning Design Activity Rubrics. Innovative Teaching and Leading. Retrieved from: https://education.microsoft.com/GetTrained/ITL-Research

Microsoft Partners in Learning. (2012). 21 CLD Learning Activity Rubrics. Retrieved from: http://www.kasc.net/2010/21CLD%20Learning%20Activity%20Rubrics%202012.pdf

Namsone, D., & Čakāne, L. (2018). A Collaborative Classroom-Based Teacher Professional Learning Model. In Yeo J., Teo T., Tang KS. (eds), Science Education Research and Practice in Asia-Pacific and Beyond (pp. 177-195). Singapore, Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5149-4_13

Namsone, D., & Oliņa, Z. (2018). Kas ir mācīšanās iedziļinoties jeb kādā procesā mācīšanās rezultāts var būt competence (44-65.lpp.) Namsone, D. (Zin. Red.), Mācīšanās lietpratībai. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes akadēmiskais apgāds. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.22364/ml.2018.2

Namsone, D., Čakāne, L. & Cirulis, A. (2017). How does cognitive demand in observed lessons and national diagnostic testing compare to PISA science results in Latvia? In: O.E. Finlayson, E. McLoughlin, S. Erduran, and P. Childs (eds.), 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Dublin, Ireland, 21-25, 08, 2017. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin City University. Retrieved from: http://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5233/pdf/ESERA2017_1197_paper.pdf

Namsone, D., Čakāne, L., & Sarcevica – Kalviske, D. (2016). Teacher Teams and Schools Become Leaders to Disseminate Innovative Practice. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2016. Volume II, Rezekne: Rezeknes Academy of Technologies, Latvia, 27-28.05.2016, 208-222. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2016vol2.1393

Namsone, D., Čakāne, L., Butkēviča, A. (2021). Identification of professional development needs of a group of teachers for attaining school goals. The 19th Biennial EARLI Conference, Education and Citizenship: learning and instruction and the Shaping of Futures, 23rd - 27th August.

Namsone, D., Čakāne, L., Volkinšteine, J., Butkēviča, A. (2018). Kā novērtēt skolotāju sniegumu un mērķtiecīgi pilnveidot skolotāju prasmes (158-188. lpp.) Namsone, D. (Zin. Red.), Mācīšanās lietpratībai. Rīga: Latvijas Universitātes akadēmiskais apgāds. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/ml.2018.2

National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. In Pellegrino, J.W., Hilton, M.L. (Eds.), Committee on Defining Deeper Learning and 21st Century Skills, National Research Council (NRC). Retrieved from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13398

Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J.E. (2016). Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes. Springer International Publishing. Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-319-41251-1. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8

OECD, PISA Latvija. (2015). Starptautiskajā skolēnu novērtēšanas programmā 2015 – pirmie rezultāti un secinājumi. A. Kangro redakcijā. Rīga, Latvijas Universitāte.

OECD. (2018). Starptautiskā mācību vides pētījuma OECD TALIS 2018 rezultāti: skolotāji un skolu direktori – kvalifikācija, nodarbinātība un slodze, darbā ievadīšana un profesionālā pilnveide. Retrieved from: https://www.izm.gov.lv/sites/izm/files/oecd_talis_2018_rezultati1.pdf

Oser, F. (2001). Modelle der Wirksamkeit in der Lehrer- und Lehrerinnenausbildung. In: Oser, F. Oelkers, J. (Hrsg.), Die Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildungssysteme. Chur, pp. 67–96.

Prensky, M., R. (2010).Teaching digital natives. Partnering for real learning. Corwin. London, United Kingdom. ISBN 9781412975414

Roelofs, E., Sanders, P. (2007). Towards a Framework for Assessing Teacher Competence. European Journal of Vocational Training, v40(1) p123-139.

Saleniece, I., Namsone, D. (2021). Analysis of School Leadership Practices as Part of A School Development Framework. The 15th annual International Technology, Education and Development INTED Conference, 8th-9th of March, 2021.

Schleicher, A. (2015). How do we foster innovation that has a positive impact on student learning. Report presented at the 2015 International Summit of the Teaching Profession (30.03.2015). Retrieved from: http://istp2015.org/Documents/PC%20Summit%20Session%201_Schleicher_EN.pdf

Skola2030. (2017). Education for contemporary competence: description of curricula and approach [reform document for public consultation]. Retrieved from: https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/3e1e8c_0b2ac53576544b70a2b689edcfbef010.pdf

Stronge, J. H. (2012). Teacher Performance Evaluation Program Handbook 2012-2013. Stronge & Associates. Retrieved from: http://mnprek-3.wdfiles.com/local--files/teacher-effectiveness/TEPES%20%20Stronge.pdf

Taconis, R., Van der Plas, P., & Van der Sanden, J. (2004). The development of professional competencies by educational assistants in school‐based teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 215–240.

Takahashi, A. (2011). Helping teachers work together to improve teaching & learning, 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.LSAlliance.org

Wilkins, J.M. (2008). The relationship among elementary teachers´ content knowledge, attitude, belief, and practices. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 11, 139–164.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2015). New Vision for Education – unlocking the potential of technology. Retrieved from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-05-28