• Ling Yi Chu Education Academy, Vytautas Magnus University (LT)



autoethnography, cross-culture kids, identity education


While Lithuanian schools face an influx of repatriated pupils post-Brexit and due to the COVID 19 pandemic, there is still no clear framework to support schools in integrating the increasing Cross Culture Kids (CCKs) and its school community and beyond. This paper examines the application of autoethnography as a pedagogical strategy for school agents to foster identity narrative spaces in classrooms and as a research method for investigating identity formation in educational contexts nurturing cross-cultural competencies in Lithuanian classrooms. This piece is part of the preparation work conducted for the upcoming serial cultural dialogue workshops with CCKs between 15-18, which borrows from the TARMAC ‘multicultural story’ framework (Ward and Keck, 2021). While autoethnography engages individuals in cultural-analysis-style interpretations of self-reflection, this process importantly aids the location of selves in one’s own narratives by exploring the self-other, personal-political, and self-society didactic- for all the stakeholders in the dialogue- such as the workshop facilitators/researchers and the CCKs and its non-CCK counterparts. This leads to the implications of philosophical and practical education approaches exploring identity and intercultural communication in alternative and non-traditional forms (Wall, 2006). Overall, this paper contributes to the formation of cross-culture transitional care awareness and strategies implemented in Lithuanian schools.



Download data is not yet available.


Adams, T., Ellis, C., & Holman Jones, S. (2017). Autoethnography. In J. Matthes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. John Wiley & Sons.

Armstrong, P. (2008) Towards an Autoethnographic Pedagogy. Paper presented at the 38th Annual SCUTREA Conference, July 2-4, in Edinburgh, UK.

Bagdonaitė, J. (2020). Remigration in Lithuania in the 21st Century: Readiness of the Education System to Accept Students from Returning Families. Vilnius University Open Series 3:6-15. DOI:

Baldwin, M. (2012). Participatory action research. In M. Grey, J. Midgley, & S.A. Webb. (Eds.). The sage handbook of social work. (467-482). London: Sage Publications Ltd. DOI:

Barr, M. (2019). Autoethnogra`phy as Pedagogy: Writing the “I” in IR. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(9–10), 1106–1114. DOI:

Blanchett, W.J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of White privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28. DOI:

Bochner, A., & Ellis, C. (2006) Communication as Autoethnography. In G. J. Shepherd, J. S. John & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as…: Perspectives on Theory (110-122), Sage Publications.

Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press.

Cappellen, T., & Janssens, M. (2010). The career reality of global managers: an examination

of career triggers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(11), 1884-1910. DOI:

Carter, M., & McNulty, Y. (2015). International school teachers’ professional development in

response to the needs of Third Culture Kids in the classroom. In B. Christiansen (Ed.), Handbook of research on global business opportunities (367-389). IGI Global. DOI:

Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.

Chu, L., & Ziaunienė, R. (2021). Cross-Cultural Transition Care in Lithuanian Schools: School Psychologists’ Perspectives. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 12(2), 550–566. DOI:

Cockburn, L. (2002). ‘Children and Young People Living in Changing Worlds: The Process of Assessing and Understanding the ‘Third Culture Kid’. School Psychology International, 23, 475- 485. DOI:

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). A thousand plateaus. Continuum.

Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc.

Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.

Ellis, C. (2016). Revision: Autoethnographic Reflections on Life and Work. Routledge.

Eurydice (2019). The teaching of regional or minority languages in schools in Europe: Eurydice report. Retrieved from

Eurydice. (2021). Organisational Variations and Alternative Structures. Retrieved from

Eurostat. (2015). Eurostat regional yearbook 2015. Retrieved from

Friedman, J. (2002). From Roots to Routes: Tropes for Trippers. Anthropological Theory 2(1), 21-36. DOI:

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.

Game, A. (1991). Undoing the Social: Towards a Deconstructive Sociology. Milton Keyne. UK: Open University Press.

Garšvė L., & Mažeikienė N. (2019). Being in-between and nowhere: A hermeneutic approach to negotiating transcultural and third space identities. In G.B. von Carlsburg, N. Mažeikienė, & A. Liimets (Eds.), Transcultural perspectives in education (147-166). Peter Lang Edition.

Garšvė L., Mažeikienė N., & Ruškus, J. (2018). Hermeneutic pedagogy in negotiating and

contesting identities: Addressing challenges of migration in Lithuania. In M.A. Brown (Ed.), The shifting global world of youth and education (56-70). London: Routledge.

Goodall, H. (2001). Writing the new ethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.

Grimshaw, T., & Sears C. (2008). Where am I from? Where do I belong? The negotiable and

maintenance of identity by international school students. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(3), 259-278. DOI:

Gornick, V. (2002). Written by people who, in essence, are imagining only themselves: in relation to the subject in hand. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Hatch, M-J. (2011). Organisations: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hiller, J. (2017). Lines of Becoming. In Gunder, M., Madanipour, A., & Watson, V. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory (1st ed.). Routledge.


Jacobs, S. (2016). The Use of Participatory Action Research within Education-Benefits to

Stakeholders. World Journal of Education, 6(2): 48-55. DOI:

Killguss, B. (2008). Identity and the Need to Belong: Understanding Identity Formation and Place in the Lives of Global Nomads. Illness Crisis & Loss, 16(2), 137-151. DOI:

Luttrell, W. (2000). "Good Enough" Methods for Ethnographic Research. Harvard Educational Review, 70, 499-523. DOI:

Mahoney, E., & Barron, J. (2020). Surveying the landscape: Common practices, challenges and opportunities in international school transitions-care. SeaChange and Globally Grounded (The 2020 Report). Retrieved from

Ministry of Education, Science and Sports (2019). Development of a network of schools working with children returning/arriving in Lithuania. Create Lithuania.

Pollock, D., & Van Reken, R. (2009) Third Culture Kids, second edition: The experience of growing up among worlds. London: Brealey.

Pollock, D., Van Reken, R., & Pollock, M. (2017). Third Culture Kids, third edition: The experience of growing up among worlds. London: Brealey.

Pratt, M. L. (1991). Arts of the contact zone. Profession, 33–40.

Ros i Solé, C. Fenoulhet, J. & Quist, G. (2020). Vibrant identities and finding joy in difference. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20:5, 397-407.


Saldana, J. (2013). Power and conformity in today’s schools. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(1), 228-232. Retrieved from

Statistics Lithuania. (2020). International migration. Population of Lithuania (edition 2020). Retrieved from

Van Reken, R. (2002). Third Culture Kids: Prototypes for understanding other cross-cultural

kids. Cross-Cultural Kids. Retrieved from

Wall, S. (2006). An Autoethnography on Learning About autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 146–60. DOI:

Wells, L. (2018). Are You Meeting Your TCK's Emotional Needs? Retrieved from

Ward, L. and Keck, B. (2021). TARMAC: A 10-Week Guide to Making Sense of your Multicultural Story. Independently published.




How to Cite