DIGITAL INTERMEDIATION, INTERNET USAGE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE STYLES

Authors

  • Aleksejs Šņitņikovs Riga Technical University (LV)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2023vol2.7059

Keywords:

cognitive styles, digital technologies, intermediation, internet, students

Abstract

Application of information and communication technologies in education has changed not only the forms of organization of educational process but also the way students learn. Studies over the last decade have shown that availability of the internet has changed the way students search, perceive, remember and assimilate new information and knowledge. This paper uses the works of cultural-historical psychology, media studies and cognitive psychology to ground the idea that the use of the media affects the development of cognitive styles. Computer technologies are conceptualized as cultural means, as psychological tools and new forms of intermediation between the consciousness and productive activity. As such, computer technologies and specifically the internet have the potential of influencing the development of higher psychic functions, the forms of cognitive self-control and self-government. The paper discusses the application of Sternberg’s conception of thinking styles to the problems of the influence of computer technologies on the development of styles of cognitive self-control. As empirical evidence the paper uses the materials of five focus group discussions with school and university teachers conducted within the project “The impact of internet usage patterns on the development of youth’s cognitive styles”.
Supporting Agencies
This work was financed by Latvian Council of Science. Project Nr. lzp-2021/1-0357 “The impact of internet usage patterns on the development of youth’s cognitive styles”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2017). Internet Psychology: the basics. London, New York: Routledge.

Baron, N. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berners-Lee, T. (2000). Weaving the Web. The original Design and Ultimate destiny of the World Wide Web. New York, London: Harper.

Bücher, S., Hergesell, J., & Kallinikos, J. (2022). Digital Transformation(s): On the Entanglement of Long-Term Processes and Digital Social Change. An Introduction. Historical Social Research, 47(3), 7–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr/47/2022.25

Carr, N. (2020). The Shallows: How the Internet is changing the way we think, read and remember (2nd ed.). London: Atlantic Books.

Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business and Society. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elias, N. (2001). The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gazzaley, A., & Rosen, L. D. (2016). The Distracted Mind. London: MIT Press.

Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Graham, G. (2000). The Internet: A philosophical inquiry. London and New York: Routledge.

Leontiev, A. N. Problemy razvitija psihiki. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Levy, D. M. (2001). Scrolling Forward: Making Sense of Documents in the Digital Age. New York: Arcade Publishing.

Luria, A. R. (1979). Jazyk i soznanie. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Miller, V. (2020). Understanding Digital Culture. London: Sage.

Nilson, L. B., & Goodson, L. A. (2018). Online Teaching at Its Best. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ong, W. J. (2002). Orality and Literacy. The Technologizing of the Word. London and New York: Routledge.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sparrow, B., & Chatman, L. (2013). Social Cognition in the Internet Age: Same As It Ever Was? Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 273-292.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The Network Society (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1982). Sobranie sochinenij (Vol.1). Moskva: Pedagogika.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1983). Sobranie sochinenij (Vol. 3.) Moskva: Pedagogika.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1984a). Sobranie sochinenij (Vol. 4.) Moskva: Pedagogika.

Vygotskij, L. S. (1984b). Sobranie sochinenij (Vol. 6.) Moskva: Pedagogika.

Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. (2005). A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1-53.

Zhang, L.-F. (2002). Thinking Styles and Cognitive Development. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(2), 179–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320209598676

Zhang, L.-F., & Sternberg, R. (2011). Culture and Intellectual Styles. In R. J. Sternberg, L.-F. Zhang, & S. Rayner (Eds.) Handbook of intellectual styles: Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-03

How to Cite

Šņitņikovs, A. (2023). DIGITAL INTERMEDIATION, INTERNET USAGE AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITIVE STYLES. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 2, 389-402. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2023vol2.7059