A MATTER OF TRANSLATION? UDL AS FRAMEWORK FOR STUDENT TEACHER’S VIDEO ANALYSIS

Malte Delere; Hanna Höfer; Gudrun Marci-Boehncke

doi:10.17770/eid2024.1.8244

Authors

Malte Delere TU Dortmund University (DE)
Hanna Höfer TU Dortmund University (DE)
Gudrun Marci-Boehncke TU Dortmund University (DE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/eid2024.1.8244

Keywords:

Video-Based Reflection, UDL, Teacher Education

Abstract

Teacher education needs innovative formats to meet the enormous challenge posed to schools by society's demand for inclusion. Teachers must be both competent and willing to involve all students in their lessons in the best possible way. One format for imparting both relevant knowledge and associated professional attitudes can be the reflection of taped teaching sequences. These are able to reflect the complexity of teaching in such a way that a particularly productive analysis can be carried out. The study aims to explore the potential of using the Universal Design for Learning (UDL; german version by Kremsner, Proyer, and Baesch 2020) as a framework for inclusion orientation in reflecting on videographed instructional sequences. We use qualitative analysis of recordings of a video-based accessible reflection task for 16 master students groups. The students were part of a preparatory seminar for the practical phase in the Master's program. The heterogeneous results indicate that using the UDL reveals multiple difficulties for the students due to its general structure and the German translation utilised. Furthermore, we identify that framing the reflection tasks in the context of inclusive didactics is essential for students' acquisition of competencies.

Supporting Agencies

This work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under Grant 16DHB2130X.

References

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295

Almeqdad, Q. I., Alodat, A. M., Alquraan, M. F., Mohaidat, M. A., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. K. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191

Alves, I., Christodoulidis, A., Carpenter, J., & Hogg, V. M. (2024). Practitioner Enquiry as Lifelong Teacher Education for Inclusion. Education Sciences, 14(3), 1-12. DOI:10.3390/educsci14030268

Baglieri, S. (2008). "I connected": Reflection and biography in teacher learning toward inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(5-6), 585-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802377631

Beisiegel, M., Mitchell, R., & Hill, H. C. (2018). The design of video-based professional development: An exploratory experiment intended to identify effective features. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 69-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117705096

Bjørnsrud, H., & Nilsen, S. (2019). Joint reflection on action – a prerequisite for inclusive education? A qualitative study in one local primary/lower secondary school in Norway. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(2), 158-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1427153

Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131-1140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008

Boer, A. de, Pijl, S. J., & Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(3), 331-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903030089

Bowe, F. (2000). Universal design in education: Teaching nontraditional students. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.

Bray, A., Devitt, A., Banks, J., Sanchez Fuentes, S., Sandoval, M., Riviou, K., Byrne, D., Flood, M., Reale, J., & Terrenzio, S. (2024). What next for Universal Design for Learning? A systematic literature review of technology in UDL implementations at second level. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 113–138. DOI:10.1111/bjet.13328

Burgula, K., Gold, B., Holodynski, M., & Hellermann, C. (2016). Fallbasierte Unterrichtsanalyse. Effekte von video- und textbasierter Fallanalyse auf kognitive Belastung, aufgabenspezifisches Interesse und die professionelle Unterrichtswahrnehmung von Grundschullehramtsstudierenden. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 44(4), 322-338.

Burgstahler, S. (2009). Universal design of instruction (UDI): Definition, principles, guidelines, and examples. University of Washington. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED506547.pdf

Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791-807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074

CAST (Center for Applied Special Technology). (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114552028

Cocca, M., & Cocca, A. (2016). Using video analysis tool and self-reflection as a response to education changes in teachers’ evaluation in Mexico. In M. Flégl, M. Houška, & I. Krejčí (Eds.), Efficiency and responsibility in education 2016 (pp. 66-72). Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.

Cramer, C. (2014). Theorie und Praxis in der Lehrerbildung. Die Deutsche Schule, 106(4), 344-357. Retrieved from https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.31244/dds.2014.04.04

Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

Delere, M., Wilkens, L., Höfer, H., Bühler, C., & Marci-Boehncke, G. (2022). Gestaltung einer barrierefreien videobasierten Lehr-Lern-Umgebung zur Reflexion digitaler Inklusionsorientierung im Fach Deutsch. In M. Stein, M. Jungwirth, N. Harsch, Y. Noltensmeier, & N. Willenberg (Eds.), Diversität Digital Denken – The Wider View. Tagungsband (379–382). Münster: WTM.

De Vroey, A., Lecheval, A., & Symeonidou, S. (2023). Supporting All Educators to Take Part in Teacher Professional Learning for Inclusion. Trends in Higher Education, 2(2), 320–331. DOI:10.3390/higheredu2020018

Edyburn, D. L. (2007). Technology-enhanced reading performance: Defining a research agenda. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 146-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.1.7

Friesen, D. C., & Cunning, D. (2020). Making explicit pre-service teachers’ implicit belief https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1543730 s about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1494-1508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1543730

Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from the learning design perspective. In J. van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research: The design, development and evaluation of programs, processes and products (pp. 45-85). London: Routledge.

Gigante, J., & Gilmore, L. (2020). Australian preservice teachers’ attitudes and perceived efficacy for teaching in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1568-1577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1545875

Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U

Hauser, B. (2021). Können sie es nachher besser? Oder können sie nur besser darüber reden? Journal für LehrerInnenbildung, 01, 26-35. Retrieved from https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.35468/jlb-01-2021-02

Höfer, H., & Delere, M. (2022). Unterrichtsvideos lesen? Grundlegung einer Lesetheorie der Nutzung von videografierten Unterrichtsfällen in der Lehramtsausbildung. MiDU – Medien Im Deutschunterricht, 4(2), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18716/ojs/midu/2022.2.2

Hußmann, S., Thiele, J., Hinz, R., Prediger, S., & Ralle, B. (2013). Gegenstandsorientierte Unterrichtsdesigns entwickeln und erforschen: Fachdidaktische Entwicklungsforschung im Dortmunder Modell. In M. Komorek & S. Prediger (Eds.), Der lange Weg zum Unterrichtsdesign: Zur Begründung und Umsetzung fachdidaktischer Forschungs- und Entwicklungsprogramme (25–42). Münster: Waxmann.

Jenset, I. S., Tengberg, M., Sigurðardóttir, A. K., Sigþórsson, R., Magnusson, C. G., & Brataas, G. (2024). The benefits of using videos for developing teachers’ professional vision. In M. Blikstad-Balas & I. S. Jenset (Eds.), Using Video to Foster Teacher Development (17–32). London: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781003427414-3

Kaplan, I., & Lewis, I. (2019). Promoting inclusive teacher education. Advocacy Guide 1. Introduction. Paris: UNESCO.

Killion, J. P., & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process of personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14-17.

Kleinknecht, M., & Poschinski, N. (2014). Eigene und fremde Videos in der Lehrerfortbildung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(3), 471-490.

Kolbe, F.-U., & Combe, A. (2008). Lehrerbildung. In W. Helsper & J. Böhme (Eds.), Handbuch der Schulforschung (877–901). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

Körkkö, M. (2019). Towards meaningful reflection and a holistic approach: Creating a reflection framework in teacher education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 258-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1676306

Kremsner, G., Proyer, M., & Baesch, S. (2020). Vom Universal Design for Learning zum Local Universal Design for Inclusive Education. Sonderpädagogische Förderung heute, 65(1), 34-46.Retrieved from: https://www.beltz.de/fachmedien/paedagogik/zeitschriften/sonderpaedagogische_foerderung.html?tx_beltz_journal[controller]=Journal&tx_beltz_journal[action]=article&tx_beltz_journal%5Barticle%5D=44561&cHash=e6db370a2c8a7acc4769f5e49b491745#:~:text=DOI-,10.3262/SZ2001034,-Angebot%20f%C3%BCr%20Bibliotheksnutzer

Krotz, F. (2017). Sozialisation in mediatisierten Welten. In D. Hoffmann, F. Krotz, & W. Reißmann (Eds.), Mediatisierung und Mediensozialisation (21–40). Wiesbaden: Springer VS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14937-6_2

Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyse qualitativer Daten mit MAXQDA: Text, Audio und Video. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien. DOI:10.1007/978-3-658-22095-2.

Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. J., & Place, J. P. (1991). Accessible Environments: Toward Universal Design. The Center for Universal Design. Retrieved from https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/pubs_p/docs/ACC%20Environments.pdf

Marci-Boehncke, G. (2018). Von der integrierten zur inklusiven Medienbildung. In T. Hug (Ed.), Medienpädagogik—Herausforderungen für Lernen und Bildung im Medienzeitalter (49–64). Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press. Retrieved from http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/RG.2.2.32062.59207

Marci-Boehncke, G., & Rath, M. (2011). ‘Medienkonvergenz im Deutschunterricht‘ Einleitung zu diesem Band. In G. Marci-Boehncke & M. Rath (Eds.), Medienkonvergenz im Deutschunterricht (13–20). München: kopaed.

Marci-Boehncke, G., & Vogel, T. (2019). How Do Teachers Integrate Digital Media into Pedagogical Action and Professional Self-Image? EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 6369-6376. DOI:10.21125/edulearn.2019.1523.

McCoy, S., & Lynam, A. M. (2021). Video-based self-reflection among pre-service teachers in Ireland: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 921-944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10299-w