THE IMPACT OF THE EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT LEADER MANAGEMENT STYLE ON THE REACHING GOALS OF THE EDUCATION INSTITUTION

Authors

  • Irita Skaistkalne-Virka Rezekne Academy of Technologies
  • Ilga Prudnikova Rezekne Academy of Technologies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17770/er2020.2.5348

Keywords:

education establishment, knowledge, leader, management style, personal quality, skill knowledge

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to investigate the management style of education establishment and its role in attaining education goals. Both theoretical and empirical research methods were used in this study. The study is based on research activities. During the study, questionnaire and test methods were applied. Questionnaire “The required knowledge, skills and personal qualities for the head of the education establishment” (Skaistkalne-Virka, 2004) in this study shows what kind of knowledge, skills and personal qualities are needed for the head of the educational establishment to possess in order to achieve the goals. Test “The head of education establishment, orientation to task or relationship with people” (Pfeiffer & Jones, 1974) as an instrument has been used to explain the head of education establishment, orientation to task or relationship with people. The test revealed the type of orientation for each of educational establishment. In conclusion: that head of educational establishment, who is orientated towards the relationship with people, has democratic management style, but who is task-orientated possesses authoritative management style.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adizes, I., K. (2004). The Ideal Executive. Why Cannot Be One and What To Do About it. A New Paradigm for Management. Santa Barbara, CA: The Adizes Institute Publishing.

Alimo-Metcalfe, R., & Alban-Metcalfe, R.J. (2002). Leadership. In Warr. P.(Eds.), Psychology at Work (pp. 300 –325). London: PenguinBooks.

Anderson, N., Ones, D. S., Sinangil H. K., & Viswesvaran C. (2001). Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Volume 2: Organizational Psychology. London: SAGE Publications.

Avolio, B., & Luthans, F. (2006). The high impact leader. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Borkowski, S., & Rosak-Szyrocka. J. (2011). Usage the Toyota’s optimum in the innovative analysis of directing. Human potential management in a company. Management styles. Leadership. Dnipropetrovsk, 84–101.

Builis, A. (1995). Skolvadības pamati. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.

Dubkēvičs, L. ( 2011). Līderība vadīšanā. Rīga: RaKa.

Hillman, A. J., Nicholson, G., & Shropshire, C. (2008). Directors’ multiple identities, identification, and board monitoring and resource provision. Organization Science, 19(3), 441–456.

Inne, R., Gailīte, I., Lūse, I., & Zīds, O. (1996). Skolvadība – idejas versijas pieredze. Rīga: RaKa.

Kayode, B. K., Mojeed, Q., & Fatai, I. A. (2004). Leadership and Decision-making: A Study on Reflexive Relationship Between Leadership Style and Decision-making Approach. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(4), 473-484. DOI: 10.9734/BJESBS/2014/5514

Kreiner, G.E., Hollensbe, E.C., & Sheep, M.L. (2006). Where is the “me” among the “we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance, Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031–1057.

Krīgers, V.(2003). Komandas vadība. Rīga: BALTA eko.

Morrison, K. (1998). Management Theories for Educational Change. California: Sage Publications Inc.

NAP2027 (2020). Retrieved from https://www.pkc.gov.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/NAP2027_apstiprin%C4%81ts%20Saeim%C4%81_1.pdf

Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca (2000). Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC

Pfeiffer, J.W., & Jones, J.E. (1974). A Handbook of structured Experiences Relation Training. La Jolla: University Associates Publishers.

Plaude, V., & Beļčikovs J. (2001). Menedžments. Teorija un prakse. Otrais pārstrādātais izdevums. Rīga: Vaidelote.

Prudņikova, I., & Prudņikovs, V. (2020). Līderības un motivācijas ietekme uz personāla iesaistīšanos darbā. Society. Integration. Education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Volume VI, May 22th-23th, 731-742. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2020vol6.5071

Prudņikova I., & Prudņikovs V. (2020). The Relationship between Leadership, Motivation and Job Engagement. EDULEARN20 Proceedings, 1015-1021.

Reņģe, V. (1999). Organizāciju psiholoģija. Rīga: Sia „Kamene”.

Reņģe, V. (2000). Sociālā psiholoģija. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.

Ruperte, I. (2010). Uzņēmuma vadīšana: īsi par galveno teorijā un praksē. Rīga: Jumava.

Skaistkalne-Virka, I. (2004). Izglītības iestādes vadītāja prasmju un iemaņu un vadības stila saistība. Maģistra darbs. Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.

Šmite, A. (2006). Izglītības iestādes vadība. IV daļa. Vadītājs izglītības sistēmā. Rīga: RaKa.

Valsts pārvaldes attīstības pamatnostādnes 2021.–2027. gadam. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.pkc.gov.lv

Downloads

Published

04.02.2021